15.03.2017 Views

THE FUTURE OF THE FUNDS

2nirr99

2nirr99

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FOREWORD<br />

A few short months ago the Paris Agreement<br />

entered into force, laying the ground for a safer<br />

and more prosperous future. Now the real work<br />

begins—governments across the world must accelerate<br />

the transition toward low-emissions and resilient<br />

societies. This transition will require financing.<br />

While much of this finance will need to come from<br />

the private sector, public finance has a crucial role<br />

to play in helping to set economies on the right<br />

path. Public funds can fill critical gaps and incentivize<br />

private investors to shift their capital toward<br />

sustainable initiatives. It can, for example, pay for<br />

increases in community resilience that won’t result<br />

in a financial return, or help reduce the risk to others<br />

of investing in innovative clean technologies.<br />

In recognition of the importance of public finance,<br />

the global community has established several “climate<br />

funds.” These funds are designed to disburse<br />

funding to developing countries to help meet the<br />

cost of climate change mitigation and adaptation.<br />

Capitalized primarily by developed countries, the<br />

funds also serve as recognition of the greater historic<br />

responsibility these countries have for current<br />

atmospheric greenhouse gases. While several international<br />

climate funds now exist, their combined<br />

resources of $23 billion are a mere fraction of the<br />

global need of trillions of dollars a year. The funds<br />

must therefore distribute their precious resources<br />

carefully to ensure maximum positive impact.<br />

This report seeks to investigate whether the current<br />

arrangement of multilateral climate funds effectively<br />

achieves such a distribution. It focuses on the<br />

seven major multilateral funds operational today:<br />

the Adaptation Fund, Clean Technology Fund,<br />

Global Environment Facility, Green Climate Fund,<br />

Least Developed Countries Fund, Special Climate<br />

Change Fund, and Strategic Climate Fund. The<br />

findings are based on interviews with a spectrum<br />

of people representing these funds, contributor<br />

and recipient countries and other key stakeholders.<br />

The authors also conducted careful analysis of the<br />

funds’ policies and portfolios.<br />

The report shows there is room to improve how<br />

the climate funds currently operate. The landscape<br />

of funds could benefit from, among other things,<br />

a greater focus on supporting systemic shifts, an<br />

increased willingness to take on risk, and improvements<br />

in efficiency and coordination. In the longer<br />

term, some funds might be consolidated or sunset<br />

once they have met their mandates.<br />

It is crucial that international climate finance be<br />

used effectively. I hope this report will help ensure<br />

this is the case.<br />

Andrew Steer<br />

President<br />

World Resources Institute<br />

The Future of the Funds<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!