ICONS-2017-PROGRAM-March-28

Recommendations

Info

ICON·S 2017 Conference on “Courts, Powers, Public Law”, Copenhagen, July 5-7, 2017 PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS Chair: Matthew Saul and Alain Zysset 150. YOU THE PEOPLE: THE POLITICAL DIMENSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION ON ELECTORAL SYSTEMS Chair: Gabor Halmai 151. THE SEPARATION OF CIVIL AND RELIGIOUS POWERS Chair: Elena Griglio 152. INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS Gerards Janneke The specificities of proportionality review by the European Court of Human Rights Freedom of Expression, the Right to Vote, and Zysset Alain Proportionality at the European Court of Human Rights: An Internal Critique Saul Matthew Proportionality: A theory for courts and legislators? Rosa Francesca The right to vote according to the European Court on Human Rights Woelk Jens No Political Question? The Bundesverfassungsgericht and the German (and European) Electoral System Ciolli Ines The constitutional adjudication on equal vote: Italy as a case study Romeo Graziella Intruding kindly? The US Supreme Court and electoral laws Palermo Francesco When the Constitutional Court writes electoral laws ten Napel Mathew Griglio Moonen Bonini Hans-Martien John Elena Toon Paolo Mayoral Juan A. In Defense of the Classical Liberal Conception Regarding Religious Freedom Framing Religion in Constitutional Power: A View from Indian Constitutional Law Judicial interpretation of the executive-legislative balance of powers in international affairs and its limits Ordering the executive what to do and how to do it: Reshaping separation of powers in foreign policy and immigration A case about the connection between the legislation by omission and the judicial decision in Italy Mapping the scholarship in International Courts: An exploration of networks created in journals (36) JUR-SEM 3-2 8A-3-27 (36) JUR-SEM 3-3 8A-3-45 (48) JUR-SEM 3-5 8B-3-09 46
ICON·S 2017 Conference on “Courts, Powers, Public Law”, Copenhagen, July 5-7, 2017 Chair: Marlene Wind Caicedo Natalia Romano Andrea International Courts dealing with the concept of vulnerability: the different approach of the IACtHR and ECtHR (36) 153. CHALLENGES UNDER THE ISRAELI’S CONSTITUTION Chair: Adam Shinar 154. FRAMING PROPORTIONALITY Chair: Anne van Aaken Bailliet Cecilia Rejection of Requests for an Advisory Opinion as an Example of Strategic Prudence by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Wind Marlene Who cares about international law? Hostovsky-Brandes Tamar Shinar Lurie Mazen Cervinek Henckels Chia-Shin Hsu Adam Guy Masri Zdenek Caroline Jimmy The Diminishing Status of International Law in the Israeli’s Supreme Court Rulings Concerning the Occupied Territories Israel’s External Constitution: Friends Enemies and the Constitutional/Administrative Law Distinction Diversity in the Israeli Judiciary: The Case of the Arab Minority The Effectiveness of Litigating Rights - The case of the Palestinians in Israel Proportionality and Judicial Self-Empowerment: Empirical Analysis of “Transplanting” Proportionality into Czech Constitutional Court’s Case-Law An exotic jurisprudential pest? Building a path to proportionality review in Australian constitutional law Systemic proportionality in constitutional review of punishment JUR-SEM 3-6 8B-3-19 (36) JUR-SEM 3-7 8B-3-33 (36) van Aaken Anne Framing Proportionality: Rationality and Cognitive Biases 155. RETHINKING THE MATIÉRE PÉNALE Chair: Marta Cartabia Cartabia Pinto de Albuquerque Marta Paulo The Engels criteria in the perspective of a national constitutional court JUR-SEM 3-8 8B-3-39 The ECHR standpoint: Challenges and perspectives (36) 47
Page 1 and 2: ICON·S 2017 Conference on “Court
Page 45: ICON·S 2017 Conference on “Court
Page 63: ICON·S 2017 Conference on “Court

ICONS-2017-PROGRAM-March-28

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?