HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Sex Work in Canada 2016
SWPrEPbook
SWPrEPbook
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
S Well I have concerns especially for people that live <strong>and</strong> breathe <strong>in</strong> the downtown<br />
eastside of Vancouver. Even when they did the hep C treatment, a lot of times it was<br />
stipend-based <strong>and</strong> they would give the person a stipend to receive their medic<strong>in</strong>e. And,<br />
I’m afraid that this is go<strong>in</strong>g to maybe happen aga<strong>in</strong>. I don’t th<strong>in</strong>k it’s a good th<strong>in</strong>g because<br />
I don’t th<strong>in</strong>k it’s ethical to tell you the truth. I wonder, too, if they do try to engage <strong>in</strong><br />
a population that lives more <strong>in</strong> poverty, or doesn’t have a telephone <strong>and</strong> doesn’t have<br />
different th<strong>in</strong>gs, whether they consent to someth<strong>in</strong>g but it’s not truly <strong>in</strong>formed consent.<br />
Especially when stipends <strong>and</strong> money is attached to it. That happens over <strong>and</strong> over aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
different populations <strong>in</strong> Vancouver. It’s not really truly free <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formed consent, right?<br />
S We already see this <strong>in</strong> Vancouver with the B.C. Centre for Excellence. Basically offer<strong>in</strong>g<br />
medication to people who are <strong>HIV</strong> positive but under the guise of treatment as prevention<br />
<strong>and</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g that as a giant research study. The people who are participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> it don’t know<br />
that they’re participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> research. Noth<strong>in</strong>g’s free, but you’re gett<strong>in</strong>g the medication<br />
for free.<br />
S I th<strong>in</strong>k that if sex workers anywhere are forced, whether it be the government or<br />
health care to take PrEP, clients of course are not go<strong>in</strong>g to want to use condoms. So, then<br />
it’s a vicious circle. How will this play out <strong>in</strong> the post-antibiotic world? We are almost at<br />
the post-antibiotic world right now.<br />
M So you’re talk<strong>in</strong>g both about STIs <strong>and</strong> antibiotic resistance, <strong>and</strong> then super STIs like<br />
multiple drug resistant gonorrhea?<br />
S I’m actually just talk<strong>in</strong>g about regular gonorrhea, regular syphilis, <strong>and</strong> regular<br />
chlamydia. WHO—the World Health Organization—says that syphilis, chlamydia, <strong>and</strong><br />
gonorrhea are rapidly becom<strong>in</strong>g antibiotic resistant. There are super gonorrheas out<br />
there, but we’re talk<strong>in</strong>g about regular gonorrhea now <strong>and</strong> if sex workers <strong>and</strong> other groups<br />
are forced to take PrEP? Instead of <strong>in</strong> five years where we’re post-antibiotic, we’re go<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
be post-antibiotic <strong>in</strong> two.