06.10.2017 Views

May 2017

  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

W<br />

<strong>May</strong> 12, <strong>2017</strong><br />

EDITORIAL POLICY<br />

The student-produced newspaper of<br />

Maine West High School, the Westerner,<br />

is dedicated to maintaining the<br />

values of truth, integrity, and courage<br />

in reporting. The Westerner provides<br />

an open public forum for free<br />

and responsible expression of student<br />

opinion, as well as balanced coverage<br />

of issues of student interest. The staff<br />

encourages discussion and free expression<br />

between all members of the<br />

school and community and maintains<br />

its responsibility to inform and educate<br />

the student body.<br />

Unsigned editorials represent the<br />

majority viewpoint of the editorial<br />

board. Letters to the editor, which<br />

are subject to editing for length and<br />

clarity, must be signed by name and<br />

may be published upon approval from<br />

the editorial board. Opinions in letters<br />

are not necessarily those of the<br />

Westerner, nor should any opinion<br />

expressed in the Westerner be construed<br />

as the opinion or policy of the<br />

adviser, the Westerner staff as a whole,<br />

the school staff, the school administration,<br />

or District 207 school board.<br />

EDITORIAL BOARD:<br />

Editor-in-Chief:<br />

Catherine Buchaniec,<br />

Bhagirath Mehta<br />

Associate Editor-in-Chief:<br />

Matthew Montanile<br />

News Editors:<br />

Chris Rios, Catherine Buchaniec<br />

Features Editor:<br />

Martylinette Sanchez<br />

In-Depth Editor:<br />

Matthew Montanile<br />

Sports Editors:<br />

Amaan Siddiqui,<br />

Dominik Bronakowski<br />

Opinions Editor:<br />

Bhagirath Mehta<br />

Entertainment Editor:<br />

Kara Dempsey<br />

Photo/Art Editor:<br />

Danny Fowler<br />

Assistant Editors:<br />

Corinne Bellot, Olivia Bitcon, Ashley<br />

Dwy, Natalia Wolny<br />

STAFF MEMBERS:<br />

Sarah Smail, Malaika Zaidi,<br />

Ashna Thomas, Masooma<br />

Sultan, Arline Vargas, Abigail<br />

Milovanicevic, Jelena Pejovic,<br />

Jenna Robbins, Ivonne Sanchez,<br />

Grace Yue, Destiny Onyeise, Suzanna<br />

Linek, Alexandra Malewicz,<br />

Nana Agyarko, Monroe Torkelson,<br />

Vincent Parcelli, Sarah Lane,<br />

Greta Sorensen, Nina Palmer,<br />

Suzanna Linek, Xiao Lin He<br />

ADVISOR:Laurie McGowan<br />

VIEW FROM THE BOARD OF STUDENT EDITORS<br />

testing the limits<br />

As crunch time approaches and final grades loom ahead, which means there is considerable duplicate<br />

students are steeped in fervent studying. This year, however, instruction and assessment happening. The<br />

more semester grades will reflect the fine print of new policies Westerner also asked, “When you retake<br />

implemented at Maine West.<br />

or redo a summative, are you<br />

Policies introduced at the beginning of the school year, mainly motivated by wanting<br />

to learn more or wanting<br />

such as the 40% policy and a new retake policy, have come<br />

under the magnifying glass due to their promise to aid students<br />

in their quest for a straight-A report card.<br />

percent said they wanted to learn more,<br />

to raise your grade?” Only 5<br />

This semester, the district also added another policy: the while 95 percent of students said they<br />

privilege of being allowed to skip the final for a class if students<br />

take the AP exam. This provides an incentive for stu-<br />

Hidden beneath the shiny veneer<br />

were in it for the grade.<br />

dents to not only sign up for AP classes, but also to make of comfort that these new policies provide<br />

lies an unpleasant truth—these<br />

sure that they take the AP test for each of the AP classes that<br />

they are in.<br />

policies influence students<br />

However, there is a loophole for certain teachers to administer<br />

tests that essentially serve as finals. The policy allows policies may have ap-<br />

to slack off. While these<br />

teachers to give summatives before AP tests, if they are used peal to students, they<br />

to assess students’ preparedness. In itself, this may not seem are impractical and encourage<br />

unsound study<br />

bad, as teachers often provide extra practice for the AP test.<br />

Unfortunately, this means that practice tests are not always habits. Providing motivation<br />

optional and students must come in on weekends and before<br />

or after school on weekdays to earn points, regardless of the first time they are given<br />

for students not to study for tests<br />

whether or not they are taking an AP test.<br />

Although AP preparation should definitely be offered and<br />

encouraged during those times, students should not be required<br />

to come outside of school hours for assessments. A far<br />

better time for many teachers to give these mock AP tests —<br />

that count for scores in class — would be on the juniors' SAT<br />

day, as freshman, sophomores and seniors had no school.<br />

Just as frustrating, if teachers merely rebrand “finals” as<br />

“summatives” in order to give them early or slide past the<br />

no-exam rule, the policy serves little purpose as certain teachers<br />

will administer tests, no matter what. If you’re going to<br />

create an incentive for students to do what you want them to<br />

do—take the official AP test offered by the College Board—<br />

then students should get the perk they were promised.<br />

With great changes in policies, there appears to come<br />

greater creativity in applying or using them, which has been<br />

the case for both the 40% and retake policies, too. Every<br />

teacher and department has different interpretations of how<br />

to carry these rules out, while students take advantage of the<br />

policies far more than administrators may have expected and<br />

largely for other purposes.<br />

The 40% policy refers to the district-wide mandate that<br />

the lowest grade for any assignment, quiz or test—complete<br />

or incomplete—is 40%. According to the district, the policy<br />

helps students avoid “killer zeros” that lower their grades<br />

and diminish a student’s hopes of passing. In addition, every<br />

teacher now must allow students the opportunity to retake<br />

summative tests after meeting various retake criteria.<br />

Some students who miss more than a single assignment or<br />

test often do not have any inclination to make them up, especially<br />

if they can receive forty percent of points for no work at<br />

all. Expecting a policy that automatically pays student nearly<br />

half of the points for a given assignment to serve as anything<br />

other than a deterrent for many students to finish all their<br />

assignments, reveals a distinct lack of understanding into the<br />

inner workings of the typical teenager’s mind.<br />

Purportedly, the retake policy allows students to take a<br />

test again if they had a bad day or weren’t fully prepared the<br />

first time they took the test and just want another chance to<br />

improve. Many students, however, want to retake far more<br />

than just a few tests and instead, retake every test possible<br />

to try to boost their grade. In a Westerner survey, only five<br />

percent of students said they hadn't taken a retake this year,<br />

opinions 11<br />

79% - YES<br />

DID THE AP EXAM<br />

EXEMPTION POLICY<br />

MOTIVATE YOU TO TAKE THE<br />

AP EXAM IN ONE OF YOUR<br />

CLASSES?<br />

21% - NO<br />

or do their homework<br />

promotes a culture of not<br />

putting forth the best effort<br />

the first time, and we end up rewarding<br />

irresponsibility.<br />

Yet, it is not only the policies<br />

themselves we take issue with; it is<br />

also the lack of consistency with which<br />

they are implemented.<br />

A number of teachers have used the policy as an opportunity<br />

to motivate students to do better: they replace assignments<br />

that received a grade higher than a 40%, but still not<br />

an A or a B, with a 40% until the students decides to correct<br />

or re-do the assignment. Other classes implement a policy<br />

where homework is marked for completion, but has no<br />

weight towards students’ final grade. If students show themselves<br />

capable of putting in the effort to complete homework,<br />

they are eligible for a retake.<br />

As far as retakes go, some teachers make sure students get<br />

the help they need and give plenty of opportunities for their<br />

students to ask questions before their retakes. Others, however,<br />

neglect to bring up retakes, if students do not ask, or<br />

instead, provide mainly quizzes, which are not subject to the<br />

retake policy. For the sake of consistency, some teachers use<br />

the same tests for both the original test and the retake, but<br />

this often means that students either make the same mistakes<br />

again or use the time in between to research the exact questions<br />

and answers online.<br />

We sympathize with teachers who are trying to accommodate<br />

the individual requests and needs of the 100-150<br />

students they see each day. However, inconsistencies lead to<br />

confusion among students, as well as gaming of the system.<br />

These policies should be used consistently, if they are to<br />

exist, rather than how a few individuals see fit. That being<br />

said, if teachers have concerns about the way students take<br />

advantage of these policies, the policies should be changed to<br />

take account of that.<br />

School should be about the joy of learning, not the joy<br />

of figuring out how to beat the system. Until these policies<br />

are rectified and implemented meaningfully in a way that<br />

both students and teachers can appreciate, students will suffer<br />

from being graded seemingly objectively with the policies<br />

that are interpreted subjectively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!