17.10.2017 Views

A Functionally Graded Composite for Service in High-Temperature Lead- and Lead-Bismuth–Cooled Nuclear Reactors—I_ Design

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A FUNCTIONALLY GRADED COMPOSITE<br />

FOR SERVICE IN HIGH-TEMPERATURE<br />

LEAD- AND LEAD-BISMUTH–COOLED<br />

NUCLEAR REACTORS—I: DESIGN<br />

NUCLEAR PLANT<br />

OPERATIONS<br />

AND CONTROL<br />

KEYWORDS: corrosion, composite,<br />

lead-bismuth<br />

MICHAEL PHILIP SHORT* <strong>and</strong> RONALD GEORGE BALLINGER<br />

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, H. H. Uhlig Corrosion Laboratory<br />

185 Albany Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139<br />

Downloaded by [Australian Catholic University] at 03:26 17 August 2017<br />

Received January 24, 2011<br />

Accepted <strong>for</strong> Publication May 13, 2011<br />

A material system that resists lead-bismuth attack<br />

<strong>and</strong> reta<strong>in</strong>s its strength at very high temperatures has<br />

been developed that enables <strong>in</strong>creased outlet temperature<br />

<strong>and</strong> the promise of allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased coolant velocity<br />

<strong>and</strong> efficiency of lead- <strong>and</strong> lead-bismuth–cooled<br />

reactors if the behavior reported here is confirmed by<br />

long-term tests. The development of this system represents<br />

an enabl<strong>in</strong>g technology <strong>for</strong> lead-bismuth–cooled<br />

reactors. The system is a functionally graded composite<br />

(FGC), with separate layers eng<strong>in</strong>eered to per<strong>for</strong>m corrosion<br />

resistance <strong>and</strong> structural functions. Alloy F91 was<br />

chosen as the structural layer of the composite because<br />

of its strength <strong>and</strong> radiation resistance. An Fe-12Cr-2Si<br />

alloy was developed based on previous work <strong>in</strong> the Fe-<br />

Cr-Si system, <strong>and</strong> was used as the corrosion-resistant<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

A deviation from the evolutionary path of light water<br />

reactor design will soon be required to meet the ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

energy dem<strong>and</strong>s of the world, <strong>in</strong> order to more efficiently<br />

extract energy from the same fuel while simultaneously<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g safety, reduc<strong>in</strong>g the possibility <strong>for</strong> proliferation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> simplify<strong>in</strong>g reactor design. These advanced systems,<br />

designated as Generation IV ~Gen IV! systems,<br />

promise higher efficiencies, improved uranium utilization,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased safety marg<strong>in</strong>s. 1 However, each Gen<br />

IV system also poses unique challenges to successful<br />

implementation. In the case of lead-bismuth–cooled systems,<br />

the primary issue is the corrosion of structural<br />

materials.<br />

*E-mail: hereiam@mit.edu<br />

cladd<strong>in</strong>g layer because of its chemical similarity to F91<br />

<strong>and</strong> its superior corrosion resistance <strong>in</strong> lead <strong>and</strong> leadbismuth<br />

<strong>in</strong> both oxidiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g environments.<br />

The availability of the FGC will have significant impacts<br />

on lead-bismuth reactor design. The allowable <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

<strong>in</strong> outlet temperature <strong>and</strong> coolant velocity lead to a large<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> power density—either to a smaller core <strong>for</strong><br />

the same power rat<strong>in</strong>g or to more power output <strong>for</strong> the<br />

same-size core. In this paper, we report on the overall<br />

design of the FGC. We also discuss the general implications<br />

<strong>for</strong> lead-bismuth–cooled reactor design. In a future<br />

paper, we will discuss the fabrication <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial evaluation<br />

of the actual product produced us<strong>in</strong>g commercial<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g methods.<br />

I.A. Comparison of Proposed Gen IV<br />

Reactor Coolants<br />

Six pr<strong>in</strong>cipal coolants are be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigated by countries<br />

pursu<strong>in</strong>g Gen IV nuclear technologies as viable options<br />

<strong>for</strong> reactor coolants. 1–7 These coolants have been<br />

identified as possess<strong>in</strong>g superior properties to others considered,<br />

<strong>and</strong> they allow <strong>for</strong> reactor designs that meet the<br />

goals of the Gen IV program. 1 Each coolant has specific<br />

advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages, all relat<strong>in</strong>g to their physical<br />

properties, which are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table I.<br />

The liquid metals <strong>and</strong> molten salts have superior heat<br />

conductivities <strong>and</strong> heat capacities relative to the other<br />

coolants. The high boil<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts of the liquid metals<br />

ensure that the system will not need to be pressurized to<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the liquid phase. Instead, an unpressurized,<br />

<strong>in</strong>ert cover gas, such as argon, is all that is necessary to<br />

exclude air from the system. This means that structural<br />

366 NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY VOL. 177 MAR. 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!