A Functionally Graded Composite for Service in High-Temperature Lead- and Lead-Bismuth–Cooled Nuclear Reactors—I_ Design
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A FUNCTIONALLY GRADED COMPOSITE<br />
FOR SERVICE IN HIGH-TEMPERATURE<br />
LEAD- AND LEAD-BISMUTH–COOLED<br />
NUCLEAR REACTORS—I: DESIGN<br />
NUCLEAR PLANT<br />
OPERATIONS<br />
AND CONTROL<br />
KEYWORDS: corrosion, composite,<br />
lead-bismuth<br />
MICHAEL PHILIP SHORT* <strong>and</strong> RONALD GEORGE BALLINGER<br />
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, H. H. Uhlig Corrosion Laboratory<br />
185 Albany Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139<br />
Downloaded by [Australian Catholic University] at 03:26 17 August 2017<br />
Received January 24, 2011<br />
Accepted <strong>for</strong> Publication May 13, 2011<br />
A material system that resists lead-bismuth attack<br />
<strong>and</strong> reta<strong>in</strong>s its strength at very high temperatures has<br />
been developed that enables <strong>in</strong>creased outlet temperature<br />
<strong>and</strong> the promise of allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased coolant velocity<br />
<strong>and</strong> efficiency of lead- <strong>and</strong> lead-bismuth–cooled<br />
reactors if the behavior reported here is confirmed by<br />
long-term tests. The development of this system represents<br />
an enabl<strong>in</strong>g technology <strong>for</strong> lead-bismuth–cooled<br />
reactors. The system is a functionally graded composite<br />
(FGC), with separate layers eng<strong>in</strong>eered to per<strong>for</strong>m corrosion<br />
resistance <strong>and</strong> structural functions. Alloy F91 was<br />
chosen as the structural layer of the composite because<br />
of its strength <strong>and</strong> radiation resistance. An Fe-12Cr-2Si<br />
alloy was developed based on previous work <strong>in</strong> the Fe-<br />
Cr-Si system, <strong>and</strong> was used as the corrosion-resistant<br />
I. INTRODUCTION<br />
A deviation from the evolutionary path of light water<br />
reactor design will soon be required to meet the ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />
energy dem<strong>and</strong>s of the world, <strong>in</strong> order to more efficiently<br />
extract energy from the same fuel while simultaneously<br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g safety, reduc<strong>in</strong>g the possibility <strong>for</strong> proliferation,<br />
<strong>and</strong> simplify<strong>in</strong>g reactor design. These advanced systems,<br />
designated as Generation IV ~Gen IV! systems,<br />
promise higher efficiencies, improved uranium utilization,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased safety marg<strong>in</strong>s. 1 However, each Gen<br />
IV system also poses unique challenges to successful<br />
implementation. In the case of lead-bismuth–cooled systems,<br />
the primary issue is the corrosion of structural<br />
materials.<br />
*E-mail: hereiam@mit.edu<br />
cladd<strong>in</strong>g layer because of its chemical similarity to F91<br />
<strong>and</strong> its superior corrosion resistance <strong>in</strong> lead <strong>and</strong> leadbismuth<br />
<strong>in</strong> both oxidiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g environments.<br />
The availability of the FGC will have significant impacts<br />
on lead-bismuth reactor design. The allowable <strong>in</strong>creases<br />
<strong>in</strong> outlet temperature <strong>and</strong> coolant velocity lead to a large<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> power density—either to a smaller core <strong>for</strong><br />
the same power rat<strong>in</strong>g or to more power output <strong>for</strong> the<br />
same-size core. In this paper, we report on the overall<br />
design of the FGC. We also discuss the general implications<br />
<strong>for</strong> lead-bismuth–cooled reactor design. In a future<br />
paper, we will discuss the fabrication <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial evaluation<br />
of the actual product produced us<strong>in</strong>g commercial<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g methods.<br />
I.A. Comparison of Proposed Gen IV<br />
Reactor Coolants<br />
Six pr<strong>in</strong>cipal coolants are be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigated by countries<br />
pursu<strong>in</strong>g Gen IV nuclear technologies as viable options<br />
<strong>for</strong> reactor coolants. 1–7 These coolants have been<br />
identified as possess<strong>in</strong>g superior properties to others considered,<br />
<strong>and</strong> they allow <strong>for</strong> reactor designs that meet the<br />
goals of the Gen IV program. 1 Each coolant has specific<br />
advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages, all relat<strong>in</strong>g to their physical<br />
properties, which are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table I.<br />
The liquid metals <strong>and</strong> molten salts have superior heat<br />
conductivities <strong>and</strong> heat capacities relative to the other<br />
coolants. The high boil<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts of the liquid metals<br />
ensure that the system will not need to be pressurized to<br />
rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the liquid phase. Instead, an unpressurized,<br />
<strong>in</strong>ert cover gas, such as argon, is all that is necessary to<br />
exclude air from the system. This means that structural<br />
366 NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY VOL. 177 MAR. 2012