21.11.2017 Views

CCChat-Magazine_3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Some offenders will be very careful and<br />

charming and nice. Some mix it up. Some<br />

have completely different approaches.<br />

We are guilty of only ever showing one<br />

type of sex offender in CSE films and<br />

resources and it’s totally unrealistic.<br />

Don’t show online abuse as some fat old<br />

ugly bloke posing as a teenager online to<br />

groom kids, the research does not support<br />

this at all – and it is causing a narrative in<br />

professionals all over the UK who think<br />

that online abuse is a sex offender who<br />

poses as children and then ‘tricks’ them<br />

into meeting them.<br />

There is way too much ‘consultancy’ going<br />

on around these CSE films and resources<br />

where professionals are telling the<br />

developers that the resource is unethical<br />

or incorrect and then the organisation<br />

ploughs ahead and releases it anyway.<br />

I know of at least two resources in the<br />

public domain that were opposed by<br />

experts but were released anyway by the<br />

organisation.<br />

What is the point of holding consultations<br />

if you ignore the experts you invited?<br />

Accept that you might not get the answer<br />

you hoped for.<br />

“Don’t show online abuse as some fat old ugly bloke posing<br />

as a teenager online to groom kids, the research does<br />

not support this at all.”<br />

Avoid a misleading title full of buzzwords<br />

and sensation. Personally, I think that<br />

‘Kayleigh’s Love Story’ is an insult to her<br />

and should have been boycotted the<br />

second it crept out of someone’s mouth.<br />

It’s not catchy or clever to call a video<br />

about a sexual homicide of a child a ‘love<br />

story’.<br />

Do not sell, roll out or deliver a resource<br />

or film that has not been tested<br />

empirically and independently.<br />

In fact, only make a resource or film if<br />

you have sought an expert panel which<br />

includes child, clinical or forensic<br />

psychologists at a bare minimum.<br />

Go to your local universities and ask for a<br />

reviewing panel. Ask for ethical review.<br />

Go and get experts to be your critical<br />

friends and listen to them.<br />

What is the effect of your resource? How<br />

does it work? How do you know? Does it<br />

work the same for all children? Does it<br />

work better for some over others? Why?<br />

Do children benefit from this? How? How<br />

long for? How do you know? Is there any<br />

difference between the children who have<br />

never seen your film/resource and the<br />

children you used it with? How do you<br />

know? How will you test this?<br />

Evaluation is vital. There are so many<br />

CSE films and resources that make<br />

massive claims to reduce abuse, increase<br />

knowledge, protect children, enable them<br />

to spot the signs of abuse, escape abuse,<br />

realise what is happening to them – but<br />

no evidence and no empirical testing.<br />

This is an edited version.<br />

The full blog can be found on:<br />

victimfocus.wordpress.com<br />

<strong>CCChat</strong> <strong>Magazine</strong> - Making the Invisible Visible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!