HONDURAS Elections 2017 - Technical Report
This report addresses the transmission and publication systems used by TSE/Honduras National Tribune of Elections as well as image analysis/forensics found on the JPEG files sent and later published online. We found patterns of upload data, anomalies in terms of signatures, and others that make us believe fraud and systematic manipulation was taking place during this election process.
This report addresses the transmission and publication systems used by TSE/Honduras National Tribune of Elections as well as image analysis/forensics found on the JPEG files sent and later published online. We found patterns of upload data, anomalies in terms of signatures, and others that make us believe fraud and systematic manipulation was taking place during this election process.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ADDITIONAL SOFTWARE<br />
AND BENFORD TEST<br />
VOTO SOCIAL<br />
“Voto social” was used with the data provided by TSE and<br />
the population converged at 10% of the samples. In other<br />
words, at 10-20% it was easy to observe a 40/39%<br />
distribution among the candidates in dispute. Hence, the<br />
theory that a rural population was the one shifting the<br />
election is flawed and bogus (As shown in FIG 25).<br />
However, the election shifted as the higher MER ids had an<br />
enormous difference in distribution and Juan Orlando<br />
Hernandez won at 60/40%.<br />
54 GANAS USA | ganasusa@gmail.com
Change language