06.04.2018 Views

SG MAG APR 2018 MAIN1s

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I’m used to hearing older Sha Na Na<br />

fans say “That was my era” about the early rock n’ roll<br />

years. I’ve understood in a limited way, but now that I’m<br />

old enough to savor my own coming of mature age and<br />

its historical setting, the ripening of post-World War Two<br />

American confidence and our winning the Cold War sit<br />

more solidly as defining elements than the overly<br />

revered Woodstock festival or the classic movie Grease,<br />

both of which I performed in. More than cultural landmarks<br />

like those, the defining impression I have of “my<br />

era” has turned out to be the freewheeling exuberance<br />

of expression that I witnessed in New York City and Los<br />

Angeles as the century ripened. There was never a lack<br />

of remarkable creative characters in either of the towns<br />

where I spent most of my time.<br />

I had bought into the hippy sandals earthiness of the 60s<br />

completely enough to find myself repulsed by the “me<br />

decade” garishness that came prancing in with the disco<br />

glitter of the 70s. Yet the 1970s turned out to be the<br />

decade for television stardom and peak earnings for me<br />

and my rock n’ roll group ShaNaNa. It was also when<br />

the “misery index” worsened for my countrymen so as to<br />

bring their rejecting Jimmy Carter’s presidency and<br />

favoring Ronald Reagan’s claim that big government was<br />

“the problem.” Then followed the “morning in America”<br />

1980s with their economic growth and the disintegration<br />

of Soviet Communism, and it was evident that “the<br />

American century” could turn out to be, despite all the<br />

sporadic heartbreak and disorder, actually a valid<br />

descriptive phrase. Freewheeling ambition, excess, spiritual revivalism, and controversy were so common that<br />

we hardly took notice, and the flamboyance in the art of a young Jack Armstrong (even in the entourage of a<br />

celebrated Andy Warhol) could go un-noticed too. It caught my notice as a compelling embodiment of the<br />

spirit of the unfolding age that is “my era” only here in the new century.<br />

Seems to me, what we collect in art should reflect the frivolous side of ourselves along with the more<br />

pensive. I find both, to my surprise, in Jack Armstrong’s work. His paintings’ stunning richness of hue, before<br />

we knew computer graphics would be able to mimic it ever in our lifetime, typified our late-cold-war-era<br />

brashness. His casually hiding his own name in plain sight, and hiding some little-understood names of other<br />

things in plain site- - it’s a playful permissiveness that’s just bulls-eye on that brashness. And in my painting,<br />

titled “Tulemagic,” I find a glimpse of it that requires a gaze, again and yet again. I enjoy how it always<br />

provokes friends’ reactions, and for my own part, I’ve even recorded a song about it.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!