Building Green for the Future - US Environmental Protection Agency
Building Green for the Future - US Environmental Protection Agency
Building Green for the Future - US Environmental Protection Agency
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
16 <strong>the</strong> green development spectrum<br />
The <strong>Green</strong> Development Spectrum<br />
The technologies and practices that comprise green<br />
development represent various levels of ef<strong>for</strong>t and<br />
impact. Within <strong>the</strong> <strong>Green</strong> Development Spectrum<br />
on <strong>the</strong> opposite page, examples of green development<br />
are qualitatively ranked by <strong>the</strong>ir relative complexity and<br />
<strong>the</strong> degree of commitment typically required to pursue<br />
<strong>the</strong>m. Easy to implement practices with little cost and<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>t are on <strong>the</strong> left end of <strong>the</strong> spectrum. At <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
end of <strong>the</strong> spectrum are those practices that require<br />
greater financial investment, more commitment, or<br />
are just more complex in nature.<br />
IHM Mo<strong>the</strong>rhouse case study pg 76<br />
Projects on <strong>the</strong> right side of <strong>the</strong> spectrum still result<br />
in significant returns on investment, but may require<br />
a longer investment horizon. Some of <strong>the</strong>se examples<br />
may have fewer tangible financial benefits, but clients<br />
are often motivated to pursue <strong>the</strong>m by less tangible<br />
or more difficult to quantify benefits, such as:<br />
• Positive environmental impacts<br />
• Improved employee moral<br />
• “Doing <strong>the</strong> right thing”