05.05.2018 Views

MAGAZINE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

paramount importance. Underwood is manipulating her, however, Barnes is knowingly reporting false<br />

information. Despite being told by another journalist, Janine Skorsky, “that Underwood is using her, and<br />

she needs to rely on others, such as editors and reporters, to vet the information she is disseminating to<br />

readers” (Print Versus Digital, 132), Barnes continues with her unethical behavior.<br />

Barnes<br />

Unfortunately, Barnes<br />

demonstrates the<br />

negative stereotype<br />

of women having sex<br />

with their sources<br />

to get their stories.<br />

Barnes is letting<br />

herself be used by<br />

Underwood for his own means to further her<br />

career. This behavior is completely against the<br />

Society of Professional Journalist’s code.<br />

Also traditional to women depicted in journalism is her not getting taken seriously.<br />

Tom Hammerschmidt, editor-in chief, says, “Know this, Zoe Barnes, Twitter, Enriched media,<br />

they’re fads. They’re not what this paper is built on. I won’t be distracted by what’s<br />

fashionable”<br />

If only this fictional editor-in-chief had a crystal ball to look into the futute (for us, present day) and see<br />

how seriously the President of the United States takes Twitter. House of Cards foreshadows the age of<br />

Trump and digital journalism through the character of Zoe Barnes. Will journalists like Barnes and the<br />

representation of them in fiction ultimately be the downfall of journalism?<br />

FICTION May 2018 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!