11.05.2018 Views

ToryNews week International

International News From All over the world.

International News From All over the world.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HARRY’S WAR<br />

Clockwise: The prince<br />

was filmed using racist<br />

terms while serving in<br />

Afghanistan in 2006;<br />

the wedding will not<br />

change “inherited racism”<br />

says Afua Hirsch; the<br />

2005 wedding of Prince<br />

Charles and Camilla.<br />

the dysfunction and scandals. The incredible success of Netflix’s<br />

The Crown proves there is a huge appetite for splendorous old<br />

pageantry mixed with modern twists. It keeps the masses ecstatic<br />

and loyal.<br />

Though not a royalist, I have watched this dynasty since I was a<br />

little girl. What a long way they seem to have come, these supreme<br />

survivors. In 1931, Edward, the Prince of Wales, fell in love with a<br />

divorced American socialite, Wallis Simpson. After George V’s death,<br />

the prince became King Edward VIII. Not for long. The establishment<br />

decided Edward’s marriage made him unfit to be king. He<br />

abdicated. In 1952, Princess Margaret, the queen’s willful sister, fell<br />

in love with Peter Townsend, a wartime hero but divorced, and so<br />

forbidden. She renounced her lover one rainy day in October 1955.<br />

In 1977, along came Diana—a 16-year-old virgin when she met<br />

Prince Charles. Four years later, she had the big dress and wedding.<br />

Her husband carried on with his long-term mistress, the alsomarried<br />

Camilla Parker-Bowles, while unhappy Di produced two<br />

sons, William and Harry. This lovely aristocrat rejected royal protocol<br />

and hauteur, instinctively treated people as equals and embraced diverse<br />

individuals, sometimes literally. The public loved their princess,<br />

but the unyielding Windsors were frightened by her. Her inclusivity<br />

was an asset to the firm, but they could not value what she was or did.<br />

(There are lessons for Meghan in these histories.)<br />

The divorce was painful, but it freed Diana. She fell in love with<br />

two Muslim men and might have married one of them. Imagine<br />

how the royal family would have coped with that! Luckily for them,<br />

she died before she tested them further. Charles, meanwhile, married<br />

his Camilla, now Duchess of Cornwall. Divorce was no longer<br />

a sin or a red line. Harry’s kinfolk, Markle’s future in-laws, now<br />

come across as welcoming and responsive,<br />

more Diana-like.<br />

Class lines are also dissolving.<br />

I’m delighted that a mixed-race woman is marrying into the British royal family,<br />

which resides at the top of the aristocratic hierarchy. It’s so powerfully and positively<br />

symbolic. Rather like Obama winning the American presidency, it was unthinkable until<br />

they actually got engaged. My white English mother and Nigerian father faced terrible<br />

hostility in Britain when they married in the 1950s. The marriage of Meghan and Harry<br />

is a sign of how far we’ve come as a nation. —BERNARDINE EVARISTO is an award-winning British<br />

author of eight books and founder of the Brunel <strong>International</strong> African Poetry Prize.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!