Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HARRY’S WAR<br />
Clockwise: The prince<br />
was filmed using racist<br />
terms while serving in<br />
Afghanistan in 2006;<br />
the wedding will not<br />
change “inherited racism”<br />
says Afua Hirsch; the<br />
2005 wedding of Prince<br />
Charles and Camilla.<br />
the dysfunction and scandals. The incredible success of Netflix’s<br />
The Crown proves there is a huge appetite for splendorous old<br />
pageantry mixed with modern twists. It keeps the masses ecstatic<br />
and loyal.<br />
Though not a royalist, I have watched this dynasty since I was a<br />
little girl. What a long way they seem to have come, these supreme<br />
survivors. In 1931, Edward, the Prince of Wales, fell in love with a<br />
divorced American socialite, Wallis Simpson. After George V’s death,<br />
the prince became King Edward VIII. Not for long. The establishment<br />
decided Edward’s marriage made him unfit to be king. He<br />
abdicated. In 1952, Princess Margaret, the queen’s willful sister, fell<br />
in love with Peter Townsend, a wartime hero but divorced, and so<br />
forbidden. She renounced her lover one rainy day in October 1955.<br />
In 1977, along came Diana—a 16-year-old virgin when she met<br />
Prince Charles. Four years later, she had the big dress and wedding.<br />
Her husband carried on with his long-term mistress, the alsomarried<br />
Camilla Parker-Bowles, while unhappy Di produced two<br />
sons, William and Harry. This lovely aristocrat rejected royal protocol<br />
and hauteur, instinctively treated people as equals and embraced diverse<br />
individuals, sometimes literally. The public loved their princess,<br />
but the unyielding Windsors were frightened by her. Her inclusivity<br />
was an asset to the firm, but they could not value what she was or did.<br />
(There are lessons for Meghan in these histories.)<br />
The divorce was painful, but it freed Diana. She fell in love with<br />
two Muslim men and might have married one of them. Imagine<br />
how the royal family would have coped with that! Luckily for them,<br />
she died before she tested them further. Charles, meanwhile, married<br />
his Camilla, now Duchess of Cornwall. Divorce was no longer<br />
a sin or a red line. Harry’s kinfolk, Markle’s future in-laws, now<br />
come across as welcoming and responsive,<br />
more Diana-like.<br />
Class lines are also dissolving.<br />
I’m delighted that a mixed-race woman is marrying into the British royal family,<br />
which resides at the top of the aristocratic hierarchy. It’s so powerfully and positively<br />
symbolic. Rather like Obama winning the American presidency, it was unthinkable until<br />
they actually got engaged. My white English mother and Nigerian father faced terrible<br />
hostility in Britain when they married in the 1950s. The marriage of Meghan and Harry<br />
is a sign of how far we’ve come as a nation. —BERNARDINE EVARISTO is an award-winning British<br />
author of eight books and founder of the Brunel <strong>International</strong> African Poetry Prize.