18.05.2018 Views

Facility Consulting Group

Brochure for Facility Consulting Group

Brochure for Facility Consulting Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Qualifications<br />

& Experience<br />

Roof Evaluations<br />

Design<br />

Thermographic Services<br />

Construction Observation<br />

Contract Administration<br />

FACILITY CONSULTING GROUP


BACKGROUND<br />

Founded in 1993 as a subsidiary of Utility<br />

Technology Engineers-Consultants (UTEC)<br />

Dedicated staff of trained, experienced<br />

professionals led by Randal S. Keel<br />

Providing <strong>Consulting</strong>, Project Management &<br />

Inspection Services Nationwide<br />

Senior staff has over 140-combined years of<br />

general contracting and roofing experience<br />

“The goal at<br />

FCG is to help<br />

preserve buildings and<br />

equipment through predictive,<br />

preventative maintenance”


KEY STAFF<br />

Alan S. Zimmerman<br />

Field Operations Manager<br />

Alan has over 40 years’<br />

experience as a roofing<br />

consultant, quality<br />

assurance observer, and as<br />

a roofer (from apprentice to<br />

mechanic). Mr. Zimmerman<br />

has been with FCG over 24<br />

years, and is a Registered<br />

Roof Observer with the RCI.<br />

Kevin Hogan<br />

Roof Technician, RRO<br />

Kevin has over 36 years in the roofing<br />

and construction business having<br />

worked his way through the ranks<br />

from laborer to superintendent.<br />

He has owned and operated his<br />

own construction and roofing<br />

company and is a licensed General<br />

Contractor in Florida. Additionally,<br />

he is a licensed pilot.<br />

Randal S. Keel<br />

General Manager<br />

Randy previously worked for a<br />

major roofing contractor as a<br />

project manager, inspector and<br />

estimator. He also worked as a<br />

roofing manufacturer’s technical<br />

representative. He has over 35<br />

years of experience in the roofing<br />

industry; manufacturing, design,<br />

installation and evaluation. Mr.<br />

Keel has been with FCG for over<br />

24 years.


STATE<br />

OF<br />

THE<br />

ART<br />

SERVICES<br />

AT FCG we consistently exceed our client’s<br />

expectations, in the process of saving them<br />

money from costly mistakes. This is accomplished<br />

through a dedicated staff of trained, experienced,<br />

professionals with the ability to assess and evaluate<br />

existing facilities and the monitoring of new and<br />

retrofit construction using state-of-the-art, hightech<br />

methods and equipment.<br />

Our drones can access almost any part of a<br />

building, and collect more useful information<br />

using its high-quality image, video, and thermal<br />

cameras. Even though there is still a requirement<br />

for the human expertise, a drone-based building<br />

inspection is faster, and more efficient.


​FCG provides a wide range of thermographic services. Our<br />

Thermographers are certified by The Infraspection Institute.<br />

FCG uses infrared, capacitance and nuclear equipment to<br />

perform nondestructive testing. The following is a review of the<br />

equipment and testing procedures:<br />

Infrared Thermal Imaging Camera<br />

The Infrared Camera is used to detect the presence of moisture<br />

in roof systems due to the differential heat loss between wet<br />

and dry insulation.<br />

Nuclear Moisture Meter<br />

The nuclear gage we use is a noninvasive moisture detector The<br />

depth of accurate readings of the nuclear moisture detector is<br />

approximately 6 inches.<br />

Capacitance Leak Seeker<br />

The capacitance scanner detects the presence of moisture in<br />

the roof system due to the differences in the dielectric constant<br />

between water and roofing materials.<br />

Each of these systems has unique limitation, and neither should<br />

be used in the presence of standing water; therefore utilizing<br />

two of them in combination provides a desirable cross check<br />

with a correspondingly higher confidence level in the results<br />

obtained.<br />

EXPERT WITNESS<br />

The stress of lawsuits especially over non-performing roofs can be<br />

overwhelming, but when it happens, you'll want an expert on your side.<br />

<strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, can provide professional, independent, and<br />

unbiased expertise during any legal disputes. FCG consultants throughout<br />

the years have provided expert testimony helping clients make their case<br />

as we provide services to identify and document the problems in a manner<br />

which can be used during depositions and trials.


KNOWN<br />

BY THE<br />

COMPANIES<br />

WE KEEP!<br />

· Wal-mart<br />

· Procter & Gamble<br />

· Energizer Battery Co.<br />

· HR Associates, AIA<br />

· International Paper<br />

· RJ Reynolds Co.<br />

· Bowater Paper<br />

· US Postal Service<br />

· University of North Carolina<br />

· Duke Progress Energy<br />

· Universal Furniture<br />

· General Motors Corp.<br />

· Raleigh/Durham Airport<br />

· University of South Carolina<br />

· Cummins Engine Company<br />

· Ford Motor Company<br />

· Thomas Built Buses<br />

· City of Seneca, SC<br />

· North Carolina Zoological Park<br />

· US Department of Energy<br />

· Comfort Inn<br />

· Randolph Hospital<br />

· Presbyterian Church USA<br />

· And, many, many more!


Information is a necessary and valuable tool for proper decision-making. Before the building<br />

owner can proceed with any replacement or corrective action of the existing roof system,<br />

complete, accurate, up-to-date information needs to be available about its condition. FCG<br />

performs a thorough investigation of the roof system and provides a comprehensive, easyto-read<br />

report, complete with photographs, roof drawings and recommendations. With this<br />

report, the building owner can make informed decisions about the best way to proceed in<br />

protecting their investment, both inside and outside the building. The owner can be confident<br />

that the best information available has been provided to make those decisions.<br />

40-Point Inspection by FCG<br />

INTERIOR<br />

Inspect for signs of leaks, interview<br />

occupants<br />

1) Floor<br />

2) Bottom of Roof Deck<br />

ROOF<br />

3) Surface condition<br />

4) Ponding water<br />

5) Aggregate coverage<br />

6) Blisters/ridges/patches<br />

7) Condition of laps and seams<br />

8) Insulation attachment<br />

WALL & CURB FLASHINGS<br />

9) Proper adhesion<br />

10) Termination<br />

11) Fasteners<br />

12) Caulking<br />

13) Metal counterflashing<br />

PENETRATIONS<br />

14) Properly flashed<br />

15) Terminations<br />

16) Fasteners<br />

17) Caulking<br />

18) Rust<br />

19) Pitch pan filler<br />

SKYLIGHTS<br />

20) Properly flashed<br />

21) Terminations<br />

22) Fasteners<br />

23) Metal counterflashing<br />

24) Cracks<br />

25) Seals<br />

GUTTERS/DRAINS/SCUPPERS<br />

26) Properly flashed<br />

27) Caulking<br />

28) Fasteners<br />

29) Debris/standing water<br />

SHEET METAL<br />

30) Properly attached<br />

31) Fasteners<br />

32) Joints sealed, caulking<br />

33) Rust, deterioration<br />

MISC.<br />

34) Walk boards properly<br />

installed<br />

35) Protection under gas lines<br />

and sleepers<br />

36) No debris on roof surface<br />

EXTERIOR WALLS<br />

37) Staining from leaks<br />

38) Downspouts and<br />

connections in proper<br />

condition<br />

39) Caulking at control joints<br />

40) Proper drainage at base of<br />

walls


I am the president of Summergate<br />

Condominiums at 4881 Cypress<br />

Woods Dr. Orlando, FL 32811.<br />

Summergate was built in 2000<br />

and is comprised of six three story<br />

buildings (216 units) with concrete<br />

tile roofs. We’ve had ongoing<br />

roof leaks over the years and<br />

are on our fourth roofing vendor.<br />

We always do our due diligence<br />

on the vendors we hire, but I’ve<br />

come to believe that most roofing<br />

companies are inept.<br />

In August 2016 we engaged<br />

<strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong> to assist<br />

us with obtaining a detailed<br />

proposal from the roofing vendor<br />

we selected and to oversee the<br />

repair work contracted for. I am<br />

thankful we did because once<br />

again we would have been<br />

totally ripped off if we had not<br />

had the reports and pictures<br />

provided by FCG to present to<br />

the roofing vendor in order for<br />

them to complete the repairs as<br />

quoted/agreed to.<br />

I would highly recommend<br />

<strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong> as a<br />

third party to oversee/validate<br />

any major roof work you hire a<br />

roofing company to do.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Mike Harris<br />

President<br />

Summergate Condominiums


“During the past 6+ years, our<br />

company has been working<br />

with <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong> on<br />

numerous different kinds of roofing<br />

projects. Their company offers high<br />

quality services and we can say that<br />

we have always been satisfied with<br />

their work. I strongly recommend the<br />

services of <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />

and I am looking forward to working<br />

with them again for future roofing<br />

projects.”<br />

Marshall Fuller, Director<br />

<strong>Facility</strong> Services Dept.


Case Study #1<br />

Historic building owned by the National Park Service<br />

FCG was called in after reroofing was already underway and problems were being<br />

detected. Moisture problems and leaks were discovered by the General Contractor during<br />

the reroof. Also, the project was being delayed due to slow work performed by the roofer.<br />

FCG was called in to evaluate the work done<br />

to date and found the following problems:<br />

• The existing roof being covered was wet<br />

and not properly prepared for a new roof<br />

• The insulation specified by the roofer did<br />

not meet the Energy Code and was not<br />

compatible with the system being applied<br />

or the roof it was being installed over.<br />

• The new membrane system was not being<br />

properly tied-in each day, allowing for<br />

moisture to enter the system and damage<br />

the new insulation and creating leaks and<br />

damage to the existing building.<br />

• The new roof system was not being installed correctly at the roof drains, preventing<br />

proper drainage and creating ponding water on the roof, which would void the new<br />

roof warranty.<br />

• The new roof system was not being adhered properly creating voids which would not<br />

meet the wind uplift code requirements<br />

The contractor wanted to remove the damaged and improperly installed materials and<br />

re-install as work progressed.<br />

FCG convinced the Owner to remove all of the newly installed materials, along with the<br />

wet existing roofing and install a newly designed system, meeting the Energy Code and all<br />

wind uplift requirements and drainage needs.<br />

RESULT:<br />

The final roof was completed within 3 months of FCG’s initial inspection, with no further<br />

leaks during tear-off or reroof. The building was able to remain open to visitors during<br />

construction with no loss of admission revenue. A full 20-year Manufacturer’s warranty<br />

was issued upon completion of the work.


Case Study #2<br />

A large shopping center with a single ply roof<br />

sustained heavy damage during a large storm.<br />

The shopping center’s regular roofing contractor planned to just patch the damage.<br />

FCG contacted the owner and their<br />

insurance company and suggested<br />

an infrared survey of the roof prior to<br />

repairs to ensure no further damage<br />

had occurred.<br />

FCG conducted the infrared survey<br />

and found numerous areas where<br />

wet insulation was spreading from<br />

damage and impact point as well as<br />

several areas of damage the roofer<br />

had not located.<br />

RESULT:<br />

The wet insulation was replaced along with the materials that were damaged during<br />

the roof repairs. The long-term viability of the roof was restored rather than just holes<br />

being patched.<br />

FCG conducted a campus-wide roof survey at a community<br />

college in eastern NC. FCG was able to inspect and provide<br />

detailed condition assessment reports on 15 buildings,<br />

giving the Owner life expectancy estimates and repair/<br />

replacement priorities on each roof area. These estimates<br />

allowed the Owner to budget for critical needs over the next<br />

5-10 years. For example, 3 buildings had been scheduled<br />

for roof replacement based on the recommendation of a<br />

local roofer. FCG was able to show the Owner how to make<br />

strategic repairs to these roofs, putting off replacement<br />

for several years, allowing the owner to put some of that<br />

money into a more critical roof replacement and redirect<br />

other funds to another more pressing campus project.<br />

Case<br />

Study #3


FACILITY CONSULTING GROUP<br />

147 B Dublin Square Road<br />

Asheboro, NC 27203<br />

336.625.0901 | 336.625.0919<br />

www.fcg-usa.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!