Facility Consulting Group
Brochure for Facility Consulting Group
Brochure for Facility Consulting Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Qualifications<br />
& Experience<br />
Roof Evaluations<br />
Design<br />
Thermographic Services<br />
Construction Observation<br />
Contract Administration<br />
FACILITY CONSULTING GROUP
BACKGROUND<br />
Founded in 1993 as a subsidiary of Utility<br />
Technology Engineers-Consultants (UTEC)<br />
Dedicated staff of trained, experienced<br />
professionals led by Randal S. Keel<br />
Providing <strong>Consulting</strong>, Project Management &<br />
Inspection Services Nationwide<br />
Senior staff has over 140-combined years of<br />
general contracting and roofing experience<br />
“The goal at<br />
FCG is to help<br />
preserve buildings and<br />
equipment through predictive,<br />
preventative maintenance”
KEY STAFF<br />
Alan S. Zimmerman<br />
Field Operations Manager<br />
Alan has over 40 years’<br />
experience as a roofing<br />
consultant, quality<br />
assurance observer, and as<br />
a roofer (from apprentice to<br />
mechanic). Mr. Zimmerman<br />
has been with FCG over 24<br />
years, and is a Registered<br />
Roof Observer with the RCI.<br />
Kevin Hogan<br />
Roof Technician, RRO<br />
Kevin has over 36 years in the roofing<br />
and construction business having<br />
worked his way through the ranks<br />
from laborer to superintendent.<br />
He has owned and operated his<br />
own construction and roofing<br />
company and is a licensed General<br />
Contractor in Florida. Additionally,<br />
he is a licensed pilot.<br />
Randal S. Keel<br />
General Manager<br />
Randy previously worked for a<br />
major roofing contractor as a<br />
project manager, inspector and<br />
estimator. He also worked as a<br />
roofing manufacturer’s technical<br />
representative. He has over 35<br />
years of experience in the roofing<br />
industry; manufacturing, design,<br />
installation and evaluation. Mr.<br />
Keel has been with FCG for over<br />
24 years.
STATE<br />
OF<br />
THE<br />
ART<br />
SERVICES<br />
AT FCG we consistently exceed our client’s<br />
expectations, in the process of saving them<br />
money from costly mistakes. This is accomplished<br />
through a dedicated staff of trained, experienced,<br />
professionals with the ability to assess and evaluate<br />
existing facilities and the monitoring of new and<br />
retrofit construction using state-of-the-art, hightech<br />
methods and equipment.<br />
Our drones can access almost any part of a<br />
building, and collect more useful information<br />
using its high-quality image, video, and thermal<br />
cameras. Even though there is still a requirement<br />
for the human expertise, a drone-based building<br />
inspection is faster, and more efficient.
FCG provides a wide range of thermographic services. Our<br />
Thermographers are certified by The Infraspection Institute.<br />
FCG uses infrared, capacitance and nuclear equipment to<br />
perform nondestructive testing. The following is a review of the<br />
equipment and testing procedures:<br />
Infrared Thermal Imaging Camera<br />
The Infrared Camera is used to detect the presence of moisture<br />
in roof systems due to the differential heat loss between wet<br />
and dry insulation.<br />
Nuclear Moisture Meter<br />
The nuclear gage we use is a noninvasive moisture detector The<br />
depth of accurate readings of the nuclear moisture detector is<br />
approximately 6 inches.<br />
Capacitance Leak Seeker<br />
The capacitance scanner detects the presence of moisture in<br />
the roof system due to the differences in the dielectric constant<br />
between water and roofing materials.<br />
Each of these systems has unique limitation, and neither should<br />
be used in the presence of standing water; therefore utilizing<br />
two of them in combination provides a desirable cross check<br />
with a correspondingly higher confidence level in the results<br />
obtained.<br />
EXPERT WITNESS<br />
The stress of lawsuits especially over non-performing roofs can be<br />
overwhelming, but when it happens, you'll want an expert on your side.<br />
<strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong>, can provide professional, independent, and<br />
unbiased expertise during any legal disputes. FCG consultants throughout<br />
the years have provided expert testimony helping clients make their case<br />
as we provide services to identify and document the problems in a manner<br />
which can be used during depositions and trials.
KNOWN<br />
BY THE<br />
COMPANIES<br />
WE KEEP!<br />
· Wal-mart<br />
· Procter & Gamble<br />
· Energizer Battery Co.<br />
· HR Associates, AIA<br />
· International Paper<br />
· RJ Reynolds Co.<br />
· Bowater Paper<br />
· US Postal Service<br />
· University of North Carolina<br />
· Duke Progress Energy<br />
· Universal Furniture<br />
· General Motors Corp.<br />
· Raleigh/Durham Airport<br />
· University of South Carolina<br />
· Cummins Engine Company<br />
· Ford Motor Company<br />
· Thomas Built Buses<br />
· City of Seneca, SC<br />
· North Carolina Zoological Park<br />
· US Department of Energy<br />
· Comfort Inn<br />
· Randolph Hospital<br />
· Presbyterian Church USA<br />
· And, many, many more!
Information is a necessary and valuable tool for proper decision-making. Before the building<br />
owner can proceed with any replacement or corrective action of the existing roof system,<br />
complete, accurate, up-to-date information needs to be available about its condition. FCG<br />
performs a thorough investigation of the roof system and provides a comprehensive, easyto-read<br />
report, complete with photographs, roof drawings and recommendations. With this<br />
report, the building owner can make informed decisions about the best way to proceed in<br />
protecting their investment, both inside and outside the building. The owner can be confident<br />
that the best information available has been provided to make those decisions.<br />
40-Point Inspection by FCG<br />
INTERIOR<br />
Inspect for signs of leaks, interview<br />
occupants<br />
1) Floor<br />
2) Bottom of Roof Deck<br />
ROOF<br />
3) Surface condition<br />
4) Ponding water<br />
5) Aggregate coverage<br />
6) Blisters/ridges/patches<br />
7) Condition of laps and seams<br />
8) Insulation attachment<br />
WALL & CURB FLASHINGS<br />
9) Proper adhesion<br />
10) Termination<br />
11) Fasteners<br />
12) Caulking<br />
13) Metal counterflashing<br />
PENETRATIONS<br />
14) Properly flashed<br />
15) Terminations<br />
16) Fasteners<br />
17) Caulking<br />
18) Rust<br />
19) Pitch pan filler<br />
SKYLIGHTS<br />
20) Properly flashed<br />
21) Terminations<br />
22) Fasteners<br />
23) Metal counterflashing<br />
24) Cracks<br />
25) Seals<br />
GUTTERS/DRAINS/SCUPPERS<br />
26) Properly flashed<br />
27) Caulking<br />
28) Fasteners<br />
29) Debris/standing water<br />
SHEET METAL<br />
30) Properly attached<br />
31) Fasteners<br />
32) Joints sealed, caulking<br />
33) Rust, deterioration<br />
MISC.<br />
34) Walk boards properly<br />
installed<br />
35) Protection under gas lines<br />
and sleepers<br />
36) No debris on roof surface<br />
EXTERIOR WALLS<br />
37) Staining from leaks<br />
38) Downspouts and<br />
connections in proper<br />
condition<br />
39) Caulking at control joints<br />
40) Proper drainage at base of<br />
walls
I am the president of Summergate<br />
Condominiums at 4881 Cypress<br />
Woods Dr. Orlando, FL 32811.<br />
Summergate was built in 2000<br />
and is comprised of six three story<br />
buildings (216 units) with concrete<br />
tile roofs. We’ve had ongoing<br />
roof leaks over the years and<br />
are on our fourth roofing vendor.<br />
We always do our due diligence<br />
on the vendors we hire, but I’ve<br />
come to believe that most roofing<br />
companies are inept.<br />
In August 2016 we engaged<br />
<strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong> to assist<br />
us with obtaining a detailed<br />
proposal from the roofing vendor<br />
we selected and to oversee the<br />
repair work contracted for. I am<br />
thankful we did because once<br />
again we would have been<br />
totally ripped off if we had not<br />
had the reports and pictures<br />
provided by FCG to present to<br />
the roofing vendor in order for<br />
them to complete the repairs as<br />
quoted/agreed to.<br />
I would highly recommend<br />
<strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong> as a<br />
third party to oversee/validate<br />
any major roof work you hire a<br />
roofing company to do.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Mike Harris<br />
President<br />
Summergate Condominiums
“During the past 6+ years, our<br />
company has been working<br />
with <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong> on<br />
numerous different kinds of roofing<br />
projects. Their company offers high<br />
quality services and we can say that<br />
we have always been satisfied with<br />
their work. I strongly recommend the<br />
services of <strong>Facility</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />
and I am looking forward to working<br />
with them again for future roofing<br />
projects.”<br />
Marshall Fuller, Director<br />
<strong>Facility</strong> Services Dept.
Case Study #1<br />
Historic building owned by the National Park Service<br />
FCG was called in after reroofing was already underway and problems were being<br />
detected. Moisture problems and leaks were discovered by the General Contractor during<br />
the reroof. Also, the project was being delayed due to slow work performed by the roofer.<br />
FCG was called in to evaluate the work done<br />
to date and found the following problems:<br />
• The existing roof being covered was wet<br />
and not properly prepared for a new roof<br />
• The insulation specified by the roofer did<br />
not meet the Energy Code and was not<br />
compatible with the system being applied<br />
or the roof it was being installed over.<br />
• The new membrane system was not being<br />
properly tied-in each day, allowing for<br />
moisture to enter the system and damage<br />
the new insulation and creating leaks and<br />
damage to the existing building.<br />
• The new roof system was not being installed correctly at the roof drains, preventing<br />
proper drainage and creating ponding water on the roof, which would void the new<br />
roof warranty.<br />
• The new roof system was not being adhered properly creating voids which would not<br />
meet the wind uplift code requirements<br />
The contractor wanted to remove the damaged and improperly installed materials and<br />
re-install as work progressed.<br />
FCG convinced the Owner to remove all of the newly installed materials, along with the<br />
wet existing roofing and install a newly designed system, meeting the Energy Code and all<br />
wind uplift requirements and drainage needs.<br />
RESULT:<br />
The final roof was completed within 3 months of FCG’s initial inspection, with no further<br />
leaks during tear-off or reroof. The building was able to remain open to visitors during<br />
construction with no loss of admission revenue. A full 20-year Manufacturer’s warranty<br />
was issued upon completion of the work.
Case Study #2<br />
A large shopping center with a single ply roof<br />
sustained heavy damage during a large storm.<br />
The shopping center’s regular roofing contractor planned to just patch the damage.<br />
FCG contacted the owner and their<br />
insurance company and suggested<br />
an infrared survey of the roof prior to<br />
repairs to ensure no further damage<br />
had occurred.<br />
FCG conducted the infrared survey<br />
and found numerous areas where<br />
wet insulation was spreading from<br />
damage and impact point as well as<br />
several areas of damage the roofer<br />
had not located.<br />
RESULT:<br />
The wet insulation was replaced along with the materials that were damaged during<br />
the roof repairs. The long-term viability of the roof was restored rather than just holes<br />
being patched.<br />
FCG conducted a campus-wide roof survey at a community<br />
college in eastern NC. FCG was able to inspect and provide<br />
detailed condition assessment reports on 15 buildings,<br />
giving the Owner life expectancy estimates and repair/<br />
replacement priorities on each roof area. These estimates<br />
allowed the Owner to budget for critical needs over the next<br />
5-10 years. For example, 3 buildings had been scheduled<br />
for roof replacement based on the recommendation of a<br />
local roofer. FCG was able to show the Owner how to make<br />
strategic repairs to these roofs, putting off replacement<br />
for several years, allowing the owner to put some of that<br />
money into a more critical roof replacement and redirect<br />
other funds to another more pressing campus project.<br />
Case<br />
Study #3
FACILITY CONSULTING GROUP<br />
147 B Dublin Square Road<br />
Asheboro, NC 27203<br />
336.625.0901 | 336.625.0919<br />
www.fcg-usa.com