04.06.2018 Views

Assessment of Variation in Agro-morphological Traits in M3 and M4 Maize Lines

A total of thirty nine M3 and thirty seven M4 maize lines derived from mutation breeding were evaluated for variation in agro-morphological traits at Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Farm, Juja from October 2014 to September 2015 to identify desirable mutants for use in plant breeding programmes. The experimental design was randomized complete block design in triplicates. During growth data on days to anthesis and silking, flag leaf width and length, number of leaves above upper ear, harvestable ears plant-1, diameter of the ear, days to maturity and grain yield plant-1 were recorded. Data were analyzed using Genstat 14th edition and the means separated using LSD at 5% level of significance. Results showed significant variations for grain yield plant-1, herbicide tolerance days, days to anthesis and silking, pollen shedding and flag leaf width among the assessed maize lines. The recorded variations among maize lines suggested that there existed appreciable variation that could be utilized in breeding. Grain yield plant-1 was significant and negatively correlated with tolerance days. Grain yield plant-1 and herbicide tolerance cannot be improved simultaneously and the breeder should decide which trait to improve. Overall, the results indicated that induced mutation could serve as a source of variations for use in the improvement of maize.

A total of thirty nine M3 and thirty seven M4 maize lines derived from mutation breeding were evaluated for variation in agro-morphological traits at Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Farm, Juja from October 2014 to September 2015 to identify desirable mutants for use in plant breeding programmes. The experimental design was randomized complete block design in triplicates. During growth data on days to anthesis and silking, flag leaf width and length, number of leaves above upper ear, harvestable ears plant-1, diameter of the ear, days to maturity and grain yield plant-1 were recorded. Data were analyzed using Genstat 14th edition and the means separated using LSD at 5% level of significance. Results showed significant variations for grain yield plant-1, herbicide tolerance days, days to anthesis and silking, pollen shedding and flag leaf width among the assessed maize lines. The recorded variations among maize lines suggested that there existed appreciable variation that could be utilized in breeding. Grain yield plant-1 was significant and negatively correlated with tolerance days. Grain yield plant-1 and herbicide tolerance cannot be improved simultaneously and the breeder should decide which trait to improve. Overall, the results indicated that induced mutation could serve as a source of variations for use in the improvement of maize.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Int. J. Agr. Agri. R.<br />

yield plant -1 with number <strong>of</strong> kernels row -1 (Prakash et<br />

al. 2006); yield plant -1 with cob length (Sreckov et al.<br />

2010); with cob girth (Manivannan 1998) <strong>and</strong><br />

(Ch<strong>in</strong>nadurai <strong>and</strong> Nagarajan 2001) <strong>and</strong> yield plant -1<br />

with 100-seed weight (Satya-narayana et al. 1990;<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>nadurai <strong>and</strong> Nagarajan 2001). Yet <strong>in</strong> other<br />

studies, yield plant -1 has been reported to be<br />

negatively <strong>and</strong> significantly correlated with days to<br />

50% anthesis <strong>and</strong> days to 50% silk<strong>in</strong>g (Kumar et al.<br />

2011).<br />

The aforementioned reports <strong>in</strong>dicate that different<br />

studies differ with respect to variability <strong>and</strong><br />

correlations among various traits, which could be<br />

attributed to the use <strong>of</strong> different genotypes. Thus<br />

there is a need to determ<strong>in</strong>e the relationship between<br />

yield <strong>and</strong> other agronomical traits <strong>in</strong> the populations<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g studied.<br />

The objectives <strong>of</strong> the current study were therefore to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e variation <strong>in</strong> agro-<strong>morphological</strong> traits <strong>and</strong><br />

analyze the correlation between yield plant -1 <strong>and</strong>other<br />

agronomic traits <strong>in</strong> herbicide tolerant maize l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

Materials <strong>and</strong> methods<br />

Experimental Site<strong>and</strong> Soil Characteristics<br />

The study was conducted <strong>in</strong> Juja, Jomo Kenyatta<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Technology Farm, from<br />

March 2015 to January 2016 under ra<strong>in</strong>-fed<br />

conditions <strong>and</strong> supplemental irrigation when<br />

necessary. Juja is located 36 km North-East <strong>of</strong><br />

Nairobi along the Thika-Nairobi highway.<br />

It lies between latitudes 3°35"S <strong>and</strong> Longitudes <strong>of</strong><br />

36º35"E (GoK 1997). Juja is located <strong>in</strong> the Upper<br />

Midl<strong>and</strong> Zone Four which is semi- humid to semiarid<br />

at 1520 meters above sea level with a mean<br />

annual temperature <strong>of</strong> 20ºC <strong>and</strong> mean maximum<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> 30ºC (Muchena et al. 1978; Wanjogu<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kamoni 1986). The area receives an annual<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>of</strong> 856mm with a bimodal distribution (Kaluli<br />

et al, 2011). The area has three types <strong>of</strong> soils namely,<br />

shallow clay over trachytic tuff, very shallow s<strong>and</strong>y<br />

clay over murram <strong>and</strong> deep clay (Vertisols) soils<br />

(Batjes, 2006).<br />

Plant materials<br />

Thirty n<strong>in</strong>e (39) <strong>M3</strong> <strong>and</strong> 37 <strong>M4</strong> maize l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> a<br />

check were used <strong>in</strong> this study <strong>and</strong> were developed as<br />

follows: In August 2013, two maize hybrids namely<br />

H513 <strong>and</strong> H520, were bought from the Kenya Seed<br />

Company. About 5,000 maize kernels <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

two maize varieties were mutagen zed us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

procedures reported for wheat by Newhouse et al.,<br />

1992 <strong>and</strong> for sorghum by Ndung’u (2009) with m<strong>in</strong>or<br />

modifications. <strong>Maize</strong> kernels were soaked <strong>in</strong> water for<br />

12 hours at room temperature, dried <strong>in</strong> tissue paper<br />

<strong>and</strong> then placed for 6 hours <strong>in</strong> jars conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 250 ml<br />

<strong>of</strong> 0.1% EMS solution which completely immersed the<br />

seeds. The mutagen zed seeds were washed under<br />

runn<strong>in</strong>g tap water for 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes to elim<strong>in</strong>ate the<br />

mutagen <strong>and</strong> dried on paper towels.<br />

The mutagen zed seeds (M0) were then planted <strong>in</strong> the<br />

field <strong>in</strong> JKUAT. The M1 plants aris<strong>in</strong>g from these<br />

seeds were self- poll<strong>in</strong>ated at anthesis <strong>and</strong> M2 seeds<br />

bulk harvested from them at maturity. The gra<strong>in</strong>s<br />

were threshed <strong>and</strong> about 1.8 million M2 seedl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

drilled <strong>in</strong> furrows. Two weeks after emergence, the<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs were sprayed with 1% glyphosate 480 SL<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g a knapsack sprayer. All susceptible plants died<br />

with<strong>in</strong> two weeks after spray<strong>in</strong>g. The surviv<strong>in</strong>g plants<br />

were allowed to cont<strong>in</strong>ue growth, self- poll<strong>in</strong>ated at<br />

anthesis, <strong>and</strong> each plant harvested s<strong>in</strong>gly at maturity<br />

to give <strong>M3</strong> seed. Only plants produc<strong>in</strong>g fifteen (15) or<br />

more seeds per cob were considered for further<br />

evaluation. The <strong>M3</strong> seed from each plant was divided<br />

<strong>in</strong>to two portions: one portion to screen for herbicide<br />

tolerance <strong>and</strong> the other portion for agro-<strong>morphological</strong><br />

characterization <strong>and</strong> advancement to the next<br />

generation. Dur<strong>in</strong>g characterization <strong>of</strong> <strong>M3</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

agronomic ally desirable plants were selected for<br />

evaluation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>M4</strong> generation.<br />

The <strong>M4</strong> seed from each selected plant was divided <strong>in</strong>to<br />

two portions: one portion to screen for herbicide<br />

tolerance <strong>and</strong> the other portion for agro-<strong>morphological</strong><br />

characterization.<br />

Kariuki et al. Page 149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!