05-07-2018

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EDITORIAL THURSDAY, JULY 5, 2018 4 Acting Editor & Publisher : Jobaer Alam Telephone: +8802-9104683-84, Fax: 9127103 e-mail: editor@thebangladeshtoday.com Thursday, July 5, 2018 The next golden goose A lthough the garments sector was able to cope with the effects of a lingering global recession and growing workers induced troubles, under the circumstances one should not realistically pin too much hope on the sole garments sector to keep economic growth and employment creation reasonable in the context of Bangladesh. Bangladesh requires, specially, the rise of some other sector rapidly to offset the losses which are already noted in the manpower export sector to maintain its macroeconomic stability. There are limitations to the country's traditional economic sectors in rapidly expanding or increasing earnings. For example, no substantial increase in earnings from export-oriented jute, leather and frozen foods industries can be expected. The same have to go through the whole hog of investments in their capital machinery, benefit from favourable demand situation in importing countries and other related factors, to be able to expand in the medium and longer terms when what Bangladesh badly requires is the fastest development of some other sector in the 'short' term with least capital investment to face up to its present economic difficulties. Out of the emerging new sectors, shipbuilding shows the possibility of turning into a major sector but that too could happen in the mid and longer terms. Only information technology (IT) related outsourcing activities seem to indicate any immediate major earning prospect for the country in the 'short' term which is the imperative. Investments in IT infrastructures would be relatively much less and already the country possesses considerable capacities in the sector. Only proper policy implementation by the government and enabling supports, can lead to the taking-off of this factor at the soonest. The already existing facilities for IT outsourcing activities in the country have been pointing to its potentials. But regrettably the same are not being exploited fully as these should have been. Bureaucratic impediments are complained to be the main impediment facing the growth of outsourcing in the IT sector. In a recent study by the world famous IT organization, Gartner, Bangladesh was included among 30 countries with the most IT outsourcing possibilities and in the Asian region its position was 9th in this regard. According to a recent World Bank report more then 8,000 Bangladeshi young software developers had found jobs in the industry in the past two years in Bangladesh and nearly 1,000 of them were working in Denmark- Bangladesh IT joint ventures. Industry sources said Bangladeshi IT industry had also developed business relations with clients in Japan and other parts in the world . Safquat Haider, a director of the Bangladesh Association of Software and Information Services, said the IT potentials of Bangladesh had increasingly been pointed out by industry monitors globally. 'The IT industry is warming up for a breakthrough, as global clients are calling local companies increasingly and a significant local market is also being readied,' said Haider, whose IT company, CIPROCO, develops telecommunication, geographic information system and enterprise resource planning solutions for clients at home and abroad. It appears that only a greater supportive role from the government can lead to a decisive breakthrough for IT outsourcing activities in Bangladesh. It is relevant to mention here that the renowned Intel company was allowed in 2005 to train 5,000 IT teachers in Vietnam and later on to invest about a billion dollars in the IT sector of that country. This allowed the IT sector of Vietnam to flourish very quickly. It is now in a leading position for outsourcing from the Asia region. A far greater offer than Intel in Vietnam was made to Bangladesh by Microsoft's Chief Bill Gates when he also visited Bangladesh when a BNP led government was in power and offered to the Bangladesh government a proposal to train 10,000 IT teachers and train up 0.1 million trainee workers for IT outsourcing tasks. But nothing happened afterwards. It appears that the bureaucracy in Bangladesh characteristically reacted to this wonderful offer by shelving it and forgetting it. But Bangladesh would be well set on its way to become a formidable IT outsourcing power by now if this very promising offer from fabled Bill Gates was taken up and positively acted upon in time. Like the golden goose, the IT sector could be laying the golden eggs by now to secure the country's economy from the threats confronting it from shrinking opportunities for our migrant workers and growing squeeze on the employment conditions in the country. A booming IT outsourcing industry could absorb millions of educated and even semi-educated young people and create alternatives in the horizon of employment when employment prospects abroad are becoming tougher and bleaker. It has been estimated that out of the emerging sectors in the economy, IT outsourcing holds out the most promise to even surpass the garments and manpower export sectors at the earliest provided it is not frustrated by bureaucratic obstructions. The present Awami League led government is taking a lot of interest in the IT sector. The same should be reflected in the fastest establishment of an IT park at Kaliakaur near Dhaka. It should also address many bright suggestions from our experts that have been made for the development of our IT sector. Be thankful for the Brexit deadline: On everything else May procrastinates What's the naughtiest thing British Prime Minister Theresa May has done? She would have us believe that running through fields of wheat was her greatest misdemeanour, but really a far worse habit that she still regularly indulges in is to kick things into the long grass for as long as possible. May's tendency to procrastinate is most obvious in the way she has handled the Brexit negotiations, delaying important Cabinet discussions on Britain's future trading relationship with the European Union (EU) for months. But her predilection for putting off difficult decisions is actually more dangerous when it comes to domestic policy, because she has no deadline by which she must make up her mind. There is no Michel Barnier breathing down the prime minister's neck on social care, for instance. The sector is on its knees and has no long-term funding settlement despite decades of promises from politicians. Every day, many hospitals have hundreds of patients who are medically fit for discharge yet have no social care package in place so they can leave. Care providers are giving up and local authorities are watching the black holes in their budgets yawn wider. May's allies insist she is acutely aware of the problems in the sector, given that she was the prime minister who tried to use a general election manifesto to solve the crisis. But of course, that 2017 manifesto fell apart, and the experience of the "dementia tax" has made leaving the matter well alone far more tempting. Health ministers are desperate for a solution soon, as is National Health Service's (NHS) England chief Simon BY ISABEL HARDMAN Stevens. But though May and the British Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, were able to cajole the Treasury into a £20 billion (Dh96.8 billion) settlement for the NHS over the next five years, none of that money was earmarked for social care. The chancellor, Philip Hammond, is adamant that social care must be discussed in the usual way in a spending review, alongside all the other departments vying for cash such as defence. So there is now a conflict between those ministers who don't think social care can wait much longer, and those who believe Hunt's department has gained more than enough money already. That most of the Cabinet are demanding more money isn't really May's fault: Many of her ministers are having to deal with the legacy of cuts made under David Cameron's government. There is much private frustration in the departments of Health and of Local Government - which also has a responsibility for social care - that local authority budgets were plundered in the 2010 spending review. Old cuts have left deep wounds, and ministers have grown tired of applying sticking plasters. But the prime minister is lacking in sufficient authority and will to tell those loudly campaigning for more money, such as the defence secretary, Gavin Williamson, to keep quiet and negotiate in private, as Hunt did with the NHS cash. And while giving the NHS more money is an obvious piece of good political public relations, social care reform isn't nearly so easy, as it involves telling a public who largely think such provision is free that they are going to have to spend their own money, either through taxation or when they access the care. One trick Stevens in particular seems keen to pull is a little-noted line in the NHS funding settlement that the DR. MAJID RAFIZADEH government will "ensure that social care doesn't impose additional pressure on the NHS". He remarked this weekend that the "obvious implication" of this is there will be more money coming for social care. It's not clear the Treasury knows what it has signed up to, let alone whether it will honour this commitment. The sector has been waiting for a green paper on social care, but over the past year the regular conversations I've had with those working on it have seen it grow greener and greener: Not so much long grass as deep forest. Hunt recently admitted that this document had been delayed until the autumn, and it is my understanding that the paper will set out a number of options for consultation, rather than a preferred option with a definite timetable for implementation, as campaigners have called for. This is typical May: Aides report the prime minister will take ages to ensure she knows every single detail about a policy before even starting on the decision-making process, which only concludes at the very last minute. This week she plans to stage a lock-in at Chequers in order to get her ministers to agree on key aspects of Brexit. She's only adopted this tough approach because she simply has no time left in the negotiations with the EU. Time ran out for social care a long while back, but just as those wheat fields were apparently irresistible to the young prime minister, so is the long grass that helps her avoid making the decisions her job requires. Source : Gulf news Iranian regime should be held accountable for its terrorist activities Europeans officials have foiled a terrorist attack targeting a large convention in Paris called "Free Iran," which I attended. An Iranian diplomat and several other individuals of Iranian origin were arrested in France, Belgium and Germany on Monday. This is the first time that an Iranian official has been arrested for such a blatant act related to orchestrating a terrorist attack. Why would Iran get engaged in such activity? Most likely, from the Iranian regime's perspective, such a large-scale terror attack would have eliminated many of the regime's opponents once and for all, if it had proceeded according to plan. After all, the regime was successful in holding onto power after Supreme Leader Ruhollah Khomeini's 1988 fatwa "led to the killing of 30,000" people who opposed it, according to his former deputy Grand Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri. Tens of thousands of dissidents and human rights defenders attended the Free Iran convention. Many European, American and Middle Eastern leaders and influential people were there, including former US House of Representatives Speaker Newt Gingrich, ex-New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Canadian Foreign Minister John Baird, French-Colombian politician and ex-senator Ingrid Betancourt, US author and chairman of the Center for Equal Opportunity Linda Chavez, and Italy's Nowadays, Britain's words and actions on the world stage are so at odds with its values that one must wonder what has happened to the country. Since the June 2016 referendum favoring an exit from the European Union (Brexit), British foreign policy seems to have all but collapsed - and even to have disowned its past and its governing ideas. Worse, this has coincided with the emergence of US President Donald Trump's erratic administration, which is pursuing goals that are completely detached from those of Britain - and of Europe generally. Trump's abandonment of the Iran nuclear deal, combined with Russian President Vladimir Putin's increasing belligerence and Chinese President Xi Jinping's growing ambitions, indicates that the world is entering an ever-more confrontational and dangerous phase. Trump's evident lack of personal chemistry with British Prime Minister Theresa May - and the Anglophobia of his new national security adviser, John Bolton - ensured that this was never going to be the best of times for the United Kingdom. But it also doesn't help that generations of British foreign-policy hands have regarded themselves as ancient Greeks to America's Rome. To a Brit like myself, this analogy always seemed too confident. Having lived in the United States, I suspected that American leaders did not heed the advice of British diplomats nearly as much as those diplomats liked to think. Still, if ever there was a moment for Britain to sprinkle some of its That most of the Cabinet are demanding more money isn't really May's fault: Many of her ministers are having to deal with the legacy of cuts made under David Cameron's government. There is much private frustration in the departments of Health and of Local Government - which also has a responsibility for social care - that local authority budgets were plundered in the 2010 spending review. Old cuts have left deep wounds, and ministers have grown tired of applying sticking plasters. former Foreign Minister Giulio Terzi di Sant'Agata. Without a doubt, Iran is now going to use its highly bogus diplomatic skills and smiles to divert attention from this heinous act. Iran's technocrat foreign minister, Mohammed Javad Zarif, has already dismissed the issue, stating on Twitter: "How convenient: Just as we embark on a presidential visit to Europe, an alleged Iranian operation and its 'plotters' arrested. Iran unequivocally condemns all violence & terror anywhere, and is ready to work with all concerned to uncover what is a sinister false flag ploy." But it is also important to point out that this terrorist plot ought not to come as a surprise. The Iranian regime is listed as the top state sponsor of terrorism. Its ties to extremist and terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda are well substantiated. Robust The end of global Britain characteristic calm and resolve over world affairs, that moment is now. And yet the UK appears to have checked out. Since World War II, Britain's close relationships with continental Europe and the US have served as the two anchors of its foreign policy. But now, both lines have in essence been severed. If ever there was a moment for Britain to sprinkle some of its characteristic calm and resolve over world affairs, that moment is now. And yet the UK appears to have checked out At the same time, the British government's all-consuming preoccupation with untying the Gordian knot of Brexit has blinded it to what is happening in the rest of the world. And its blinkered view seems certain to persist. Negotiating the terms of Britain's withdrawal from the EU is likely to take years, and the outcome will inevitably have implications for the country's unity, given the intractable issue of the Northern Irish border. Even if that issue can be sorted out, a campaign in Scotland to link it to the EU rather than to London evidence, including a US federal court ruling, found "Iran furnished material and direct support for the 9/11 terrorists." Eight of the hijackers passed through Iran before heading to the US. Iran also provided funds, logistical support and ammunition to Al-Qaeda leaders, sheltering several of them in exchange for attacks on US interests. The But it is also important to point out that this terrorist plot ought not to come as a surprise. The Iranian regime is listed as the top state sponsor of terrorism. Its ties to extremist and terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda are well substantiated. Robust evidence, including a US federal court ruling, found "Iran furnished material and direct support for the 9/11 terrorists." Eight of the hijackers passed through Iran before heading to the US. Iranian regime continued to support Al- Qaeda in Iraq and other countries with the goal of pushing out forces that are rivals to Tehran. The existence of this alliance clearly explains why Al-Qaeda has never attacked Iran. The Iranian regime also attempted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the US with a bomb at a well-known restaurant in Washington in 2011. Without a doubt, Iran is now going to will continue to command the attention of the government and civil service for the foreseeable future. At any rate, the promise of a "global Britain" freed from the chains of the EU was never more than idle talk and sloganeering. At the recent Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in London, business and political leaders from Commonwealth countries around the world heard plenty of Brexiteer bluster, but little concrete talk of future trade deals. India is one country that could potentially be a major UK trade Likewise, most of those outside the "Leave" camp regard the Brexiteers' aspiration for Britain to lead the vast "Anglosphere" into a brave new world as a comical delusion. To be sure, the show of US and European support after the alleged nerve-agent attack on a former Russian spy and his daughter in Salisbury, England, might suggest that Britain is still punching above its weight. partner after Brexit. The problem is that Indians see Britain and Europe as one market. To them, Britain's quest to adopt its own rules and standards amounts to a frivolous inconvenience. Before expanding trade and investment with Britain, India will most likely pursue a deeper relationship with the EU. Indeed, India never saw Britain as a particular champion of its interests inside the EU. Likewise, most of those outside the "Leave" camp regard the Brexiteers' aspiration for Britain to lead the vast use its highly bogus diplomatic skills and smiles to divert attention from this heinous act Many people have been killed by the Iranian regime in terrorist attacks. Examples of such destructive behavior include the 1983 suicide bombing in Lebanon that killed 241 American servicemen (220 Marines, 18 sailors and three soldiers); the Khobar Towers bombing of 1996; and the 2000 attack on the USS Cole, with the direct support and involvement of Hezbollah and Al-Qaeda. The other issue to pay attention to is linked to the arrested Iranian diplomat, who was residing in a foreign embassy and had been enjoying diplomatic immunity. His involvement in the foiled terrorist attack must be considered to be so grave that the Austrian Foreign Ministry gave the Iranian regime an ultimatum and pointed out: "The Iranian diplomat will be denied diplomatic status within 48 hours because of the existence of a European arrest warrant." The international community should be aware that it is believed the Iranian regime uses its embassies and consulates in foreign countries as cells to promote extremism and support militias and proxies. For example, an Iranian ambassador and 14 other diplomats were expelled from Kuwait last year over links to a "spy and terror" cell. Source: Arab news "Anglosphere" into a brave new world as a comical delusion. To be sure, the show of US and European support after the alleged nerve-agent attack on a former Russian spy and his daughter in Salisbury, England, might suggest that Britain is still punching above its weight. The coordinated expulsion of Russian spies from the EU and the United States was a victory for British diplomacy, and suspicions that the Russians were exploiting Britain's increasing isolation seem to have mobilized the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. But the larger truth is that the Russians are right: Britain is now Western Europe's weak link. Thus it is only a matter of time before Putin probes British weakness again. And, as if the old sin of turning a blind eye to Russian oligarchs laundering money through the UK were not problematic enough, the suicidal act of quitting the EU leaves Britain with fewer tools to combat Russian meddling in its affairs. Britain is losing its influence over EU cybersecurity and energy policies just as cyber-warfare and energy geopolitics are becoming key fronts for hostile state and non-state actors. Worse, at the same time that Britain is giving up its seat at the EU table, it also seems to be giving up its liberal-democratic values. During the Brexit referendum campaign, the Leave camp openly stoked hostility toward outsiders. And the recent "Windrush" scandal over the government's poor treatment of Caribbean-born legal residents has reprised the illiberal legacy of May's previous tenure at the Home Office. Source : Asia times
HEALTH THURSDAY, JULY 5, 2018 5 Artificial ovary to enable women conceive after chemotherapy We make up for some of the calories we burn during exercise, but not all. Photo: iStock Exercise results in weight loss, if done enough Gretchen Reynolds Can working out help us to drop pounds after all? A provocative new study involving overweight men and women suggests that it probably can, undercutting a widespread notion that exercise, by itself, is worthless for weight loss. But the findings also indicate that, to benefit, we may need to exercise quite a bit. In theory, exercise should contribute substantially to weight loss. It burns calories. If we do not replace them, our bodies should achieve negative energy balance, use stored fat for fuel and shed pounds. But life and our metabolisms are not predictable or fair, as multiple exercise studies involving people and animals show. In these experiments, participants lose less weight than would be expected, given the energy they expend during exercise. The studies generally have concluded that the exercisers had compensated for the energy they had expended during exercise, either by eating more or moving less throughout the day. These compensations were often unwitting but effective. Some researchers had begun to wonder, though, if the amount of exercise might matter. Many of the past human experiments had involved about 30 minutes a day or so of moderate exercise, which is the amount generally recommended by current guidelines to improve health. But what if people exercised more, some researchers asked. Would they still compensate for all the calories that they burned. To find out, scientists from the University of North Dakota and other institutions decided to invite 31 overweight, sedentary men and women to a lab for measurements of their resting metabolic rate and body composition. The volunteers also recounted in detail what they had eaten the previous day and agreed to wear a sophisticated activity tracker for a week. The scientists then randomly divided them into groups. One group began a program of walking briskly five times a week on a treadmill until they had burned 300 calories, which took most of them about 30 minutes. (The sessions were individualized.) The men and women in the group that had burned 1,500 calories a week with exercise proved to have compensated for nearly 950 of those calories, the numbers indicated. Interestingly, those in the other group had also compensated for some of the calories they had burned, and to almost the exact same extent as those who had exercised less, adding back about 1,000 calories a week, the calculations showed. But since they had expended 3,000 calories a week, they had wound up with a weekly deficit of about 2,000 calories from exercise and lost fat, the researchers concluded. The findings were published in the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. How the volunteers had compensated was not absolutely clear, says Kyle Flack, an assistant professor at the University of Kentucky, who conducted the experiment as part of his graduate research. People's resting metabolic rates had not changed during the study, he says, whichever group they had been in. Their activity monitors also showed few differences in how much or little they moved during the day. So the caloric compensation must have involved overeating, he says. But the volunteers did not think so. "Their food recall did not show differences" in how much they reported eating at the start and end of the study, Dr. Flack says. Over the course of the week, these volunteers burned 1,500 extra calories with their exercise program. The other group began working out for twice as long, burning 600 calories per session, or about 3,000 calories per week. The exercise program lasted for 12 weeks. The researchers asked their volunteers not to change their diets or lifestyles during this time and to wear the activity monitors for a few days. After four months, everyone returned to the lab and repeated the original tests. The results must have been disconcerting for some of them. Those men and women who had burned about 1,500 calories a week with exercise turned out to have lost little if any body fat, the tests showed. Some were heavier. But most of those who had walked twice as much were thinner now. Twelve of them had shed at least 5 percent of their body fat during the study. The researchers then used mathematical calculations, based on each person's fat loss (if any), to determine whether and by how much they had compensated for their exercise. Keep seeing the same doctor contributes in lower death rates Nice to see you again, doc. Seeing the same doctor doesn't just give you the comfort of a familiar face - it might save your life. Denis Pereira Gray of St Leonard's Medical Practice and colleagues at the University of Exeter, UK analysed the results of 22 studies from nine countries with different health systems. Eighteen of the studies found that people who saw the same doctor over time had significantly lower death rates. Because the studies use different ways to measure continuity, it wasn't possible to get an overall estimate for how big the reduction in mortality is. One recent study looked at 396,838 patients with diabetes in Taiwan. In those with a high level of continuity, the death rate was half as high as those with low continuity. The benefits of continuity were not limited to family doctors or GPs, but applied to specialist physicians, psychiatrists and surgeons too. The Photo: Hero Images relationship could be because people with poor health need to see more different doctors, but the studies tried to account for this. Studies have shown that patients who see the same doctor consistently have higher satisfaction, are more likely to follow medical advice, take up preventative care such as immunisations more often and have significantly fewer unnecessary hospital admissions. "When a patient sees a doctor they know and get on with, they talk more freely and give that doctor much more relevant information, sometimes quite personal information or anxieties they have, and the doctor can then tailor the advice and management plans much more subtly," says Pereira Gray. However, being able to give patients continuity is increasingly challenging because of a shortage of GPs. According to a recent study in England, the chance of seeing the same GP fell by 27 per cent between 2012 and 2017. The importance of continuity is seriously underappreciated in health systems, says Pereira Gray. "It's seen in hospitals and general practices as a kind of convenience to give the patient they want to see," he says. "It's becoming clearer that this is about the quality of medical practice." Health Desk Scientists have taken further steps in creating an artificial ovary that could one day used to help women who have been left infertile after cancer treatment. Researchers from the Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark, took ovarian tissue from cancer patients and stripped it of cells. They then transplanted this structure into mice and found that it could support the survival and growth of the follicles. Twenty follicles were transplanted in and a quarter of them survived for at least three weeks. It is hoped that this artificial ovary could be implanted back into women and restore their fertility after cancer treatment. "This is the first time that isolated human follicles have survived in a decellularised human scaffold," said Susanne Por, who presented the work at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESGRE) annual meeting in Barcelona today. Cancer treatments can often damage the ovaries, blocking the production of eggs and A scanning electron microscope image of a human ovary. making pregnancy impossible. Women diagnosed with cancer can have their eggs frozen. Sometimes, doctors may offer to remove or freeze all or part of an ovary for retransplantation after treatment. However, this runs the risk of reintroducing cancer cells, as some cancers can spread to the ovaries. An "artificial ovary" could reduce this risk. Nick Macklon, medical director at London Women's Clinic, said this is an "exciting development" but added that further research is needed to prove its usefulness in humans. Stuart Lavery, consultant gynaecologist at Hammersmith Hospital, said that if this is shown to be effective, it offers huge advantages over IVF and egg freezing. "Because potentially these small pieces of tissue will have thousands of eggs and clearly if it does work, there's the advantage of then getting pregnant the old-fashioned way," says Lavery. Artificial ovaries could also one day help relieve women of some of the symptoms of the menopause. Marriage may be good for your heart Nicholas Bakalar Being married may reduce the risk of heart disease and cardiovascular death, a review of studies has found. Researchers pooled data on more than two million participants in 34 studies carried out in the United States, Britain, Japan, Russia, Sweden, Spain, Greece and eight other countries. They found that compared with married people, those who were unmarried - whether never married, widowed or divorced - were 42 percent more likely to have some form of cardiovascular disease and 16 percent more likely to have coronary heart disease. The unmarried also had a 43 percent increased likelihood of coronary heart disease death and a 55 percent increased risk for death from stroke. Stroke risk was increased for the unmarried and divorced, but not for the widowed. The authors acknowledge that the study, published in Heart, has several weaknesses. While most analyses adjusted for multiple variables, these varied across studies, and some factors were not accounted for, including financial stability, medication adherence and social support. Being married may reduce the risk of heart disease and cardiovascular death, a review of studies has found. Researchers pooled data on more than two million participants in 34 studies carried out in the United States, Britain, Japan, Russia, Sweden, Spain, Greece and eight other countries. They found that compared Being widowed, divorced or never married increases the risk of heart disease. Photo: Manfred Kag with married people, those who were unmarried - whether never married, widowed or divorced - were 42 percent more likely to have some form of cardiovascular disease and 16 percent more likely to have coronary heart disease. The unmarried also had a 43 percent increased likelihood of coronary heart disease death and a 55 percent increased risk for death from stroke. Stroke risk was increased for the unmarried and divorced, but not for the widowed. The authors acknowledge that the study, published in Heart, has several weaknesses. While most analyses adjusted for multiple variables, these varied across studies, and some factors were not accounted for, including financial stability, medication adherence and social support. Photo: Collected
Page 1 and 2: THURSDAY DHAKA:July 5, 2018; Ashar
Page 3: METRO THURSDAY, JULY 5, 2018 3 DUJ
Page 7 and 8: INTERNATIONAL THURSDAY, 7 JULY 5 20
Page 9 and 10: SPORTS THURSDAY, JULY 5, 2018 9 Fiv
Page 11 and 12: MISCELLANEOUS THURSDAY, JULY 5, 201

05-07-2018

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?