Safe Spaces Human Rights Education in Diverse Contexts

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CRITIQUE Fairclough, N. (1991). Discourse processes and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 138–168. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman. Fairclough, N. (2005). Peripheral vision: Discourse analysis in organizational studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26, 915. Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Harper Colophon Books. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books. Foucault, M. (1994). Power. Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, Volume 3. London: Penguin Books. Garrity, Z. (2010). Discourse analysis, Foucault and social work research: Identifying some methodological complexities. Journal of Social Work, 10(2), 193–210. Gerhart, G. M. (2003). Review. Council on Foreign Relations, 82(2), 166–167. Goldup, T. (2007). Review of Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism by Costas Douzinas, King’s Law Journal, 535–540. Gourevitch, A. (2009). Are human rights liberal? Journal of Human Rights, 8, 301–322. Habermas, J. (2003). Philosophy in a Time of Terror. In G. Borradori, Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Habermas, J. (2006). Time of transitions. Cambrigde: Polity. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hassan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspects of language as a socialsemiotic perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, Knowledge and discourse. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates. Discourse theory and practice: A reader. London: Sage. Hamilton, L. A. (2003). The political philosophy of needs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1993). Language as ideology (2 nd ed.). London: Routledge. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Hook, D. (2005). Genealogy, discourse, “effective history”: Foucault and the work of critique. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 3–31. Honig, B. (2006). Dead rights, live futures: On Habermas’s attempt to reconcile constitutionalism and democracy. In L.Thomassen (Ed) The Derrida-Habermas reader. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Howarth, D. (2002). Discourse. New Delhi: Viva Books Private Limited. Ignatieff, M. (2000). The rights revolution. Toronto: House of Anansi Press Limited. Ishay, M. R. (2004). The history of human rights. From ancient times to the globalization era. California: University of California Press. Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis and theory and method. London: Sage. Keet, A. (2010). Human rights education: A conceptual analysis. Saarbruken: Lampert Academic Publishing. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge. Laclau, E. (1988). Metaphor and social antagonism. In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds) Marxism and the interpretation and culture. (pp.249–257). Basingstok: Macmillan Education,. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso. Lenhart, V., & Savolainen, K. (Eds.) (2002). Special issue on education and human rights, International Review of Education, 48(3 & 4), 53. Locke, T. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. London: Continuum. Luke, A. (1995–1996). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21, 3–48. Matolino, B. (2009). Radicals versus moderates: A critique of Gyekye’s moderate communitarianism. South African Journal of Philosophy, 28(2), 16–170. Mutua, M. (2002). Human rights. A political and cultural critique. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 25
ANDRÉ KEET Ozsu, U. (2008). Review of Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism, by C. Douzinas. European Journal of International Law, 19, 859–879. Pecheux, M. (1975). Language, semantics and ideology. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2003). Introduction: Foucault today. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from the essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. vii–xxxv). New York: New Press. Rogers, R. (2003). A critical discourse analysis of family literacy practices: Power in and out of print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlabaum. Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & O’Garro Joseph, G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365–416. Schultz, B. (2004). Jeremy Bentham. In J. Baggini & J. Stangroom (Eds) Great Thinkers A-Z. London: Continuum. Sen, A. (2004). Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4), 315–356. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin Books Ltd. Souter, J. (2009). Humanity, suffering and victimhood: A defence of human rights pragmatism. Politics 29(1), 45–52. Suarez, D., & Ramirez, F. (2004). Human rights and citizenship: The emergence of human rights education. Working Papers, Number 12, Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, Stanford Institute for International Studies. Suarez, D. (2006). Creating global citizens? Human rights in Latin America and the Caribbean Cal, USA: Stanford University Suarez, D., Ramirez, F., & Koo, J. (2009). UNESCO and the Associated Schools Project: Symbolic affirmation of world community, international understanding, and human rights. Sociology of Education, 83(2), 197–216. Tibbitts, F. (2002). Understanding what we do: Emerging models for human rights education. International Review of Education, 48(3 & 4), 159–171. Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell. Van Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. Vass, E. (1992). Diskursanalyse als interdisziplinäres Forschungsgebiet. Universität Wien: Diplomarbeit. Verma, V. (2000). Justice, equality and community. An essay in Marxist political theory. New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd. Weil, S. (2005). Simone Weil: An anthology. S. Miles (Ed.). London: Penguin Books. Wetherall, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. (2001). Discourse theory and practice: A reader. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Wetherall, A., Watson, B. M., & Gallois, C. (2007). Language, discourse & social psychology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Willig, C. (Ed.). (1999). Applied discourse analysis: Social and psychological interventions. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis: Introducing qualitative methods. New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd. Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetoric of racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge. Yates, S., & Hiles, D. (2010). Towards a “critical ontology of ourselves”? Foucault, subjectivity and discourse analysis. Theory and Psychology, 20(1), 52–75. Žižek, S. (2011). Living in the end times. London: Verso. 26
Page 1 and 2: CRITICAL ISSUES IN THE FUTURE OF LE
Page 3 and 4: CRITICAL ISSUES IN THE FUTURE OF LE
Page 5 and 6: A C.I.P. record for this book is av
Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTS 10. Girls’ Expe
Page 9 and 10: CORNELIA ROUX human rights educatio
Page 11 and 12: LIAM GEARON group for the proposed
Page 13 and 14: LIAM GEARON application, to a conte
Page 16 and 17: ANDRÉ KEET DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CR
Page 18 and 19: DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CRITIQUE betwe
Page 20 and 21: DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CRITIQUE regul
Page 22 and 23: DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CRITIQUE As no
Page 24 and 25: DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CRITIQUE consu
Page 26 and 27: DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CRITIQUE semin
Page 28 and 29: DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CRITIQUE Hamil
Page 30 and 31: DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CRITIQUE objec
Page 32 and 33: DISCOURSE, BETRAYAL, CRITIQUE “Cr
Page 36: ONLINE REFERENCES DISCOURSE, BETRAY
Page 39 and 40: CORNELIA ROUX The aim of this chapt
Page 41 and 42: CORNELIA ROUX The research paradigm
Page 43 and 44: CORNELIA ROUX conflict, in many the
Page 45 and 46: CORNELIA ROUX I draw on Dewey’s (
Page 47 and 48: CORNELIA ROUX patriarchal system ha
Page 49 and 50: CORNELIA ROUX important, because ou
Page 51 and 52: CORNELIA ROUX • Our starting poin
Page 53 and 54: CORNELI IA ROUX working g in their
Page 55 and 56: CORNELI IA ROUX This dev velopment
Page 57 and 58: CORNELIA ROUX Booth, K., & Dunn, T.
Page 59: CORNELIA ROUX 50 DOCUMENTS African

Safe Spaces Human Rights Education in Diverse Contexts

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?