12.11.2018 Views

SCI Magazine Summer 2018

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chinese Securitisation Issuance<br />

Julien Martin, Bond Connect<br />

“There has been considerable debate<br />

that some Chinese securitisations have not<br />

achieved true sale and been off balance sheet.<br />

The market has now become more comfortable<br />

with the credit asset securitisation<br />

originated by financial institutions regulated<br />

by bank regulators and so-called standard<br />

structures, but less so for non-standard transactions,”<br />

says Hu.<br />

Comingling risk, where originators are<br />

also servicers, has also been cited as a concern.<br />

There have been cases where originators have<br />

misused payments due to the securitisation for<br />

other purposes instead, thus disrupting cash<br />

to noteholders. The development of professional<br />

servicers is therefore keenly awaited,<br />

along with other similar infrastructure<br />

improvements on investors’ wish lists.<br />

Investors, particularly international investors,<br />

are also watching for greater involvement<br />

by Western rating agencies and originators.<br />

This is a process which has already begun.<br />

“Ratings are a very large gap. There are<br />

domestic agencies whose rating scales appear<br />

comparable but are substantially inflated compared<br />

to the ones used in the West. Those rating<br />

agencies which most investors are familiar<br />

with are now becoming more involved in<br />

the Chinese market and that will help a lot.<br />

Westerners will trust S&P fairly readily, for<br />

example,” says Rochford.<br />

Mertl comments: “Greater integration of<br />

international rating agencies into the Chinese<br />

market will really help international investors.<br />

We have already seen the likes of GM,<br />

Ford, Volkswagen and BMW, among others,<br />

successfully issuing auto ABS deals in China<br />

using the structures similar to those used in<br />

the US or Europe. Keeping that consistency<br />

also makes rating those deals easier.”<br />

The greater involvement of global originators<br />

and rating agencies, and the expertise<br />

they bring with them, will help the domestic<br />

originators and rating agencies to develop.<br />

As Martin notes when discussing the related<br />

issue of global investors, “China does not need<br />

just capital, what it needs is smart capital”.<br />

This lack of experience is evident in the<br />

behaviour of domestic investors. Chen says:<br />

“Investors tend to pay more attention to counterparty<br />

risks than asset-based risks. The market<br />

is more used to price issuer’s credit risks<br />

and equity risks, and it will need more time to<br />

Richard Mertl, King & Wood Mallesons<br />

develop comprehensive pricing mechanisms<br />

for structured credit risks.”<br />

This greater involvement of global participants,<br />

with the experience and expertise they<br />

can bring, will fuel a new phase in the Chinese<br />

securitisation market’s development, just as<br />

the supportive policies of the government<br />

and regulators have provided its ignition. The<br />

education process is already well underway.<br />

“There are multiple annual conferences –<br />

for example the China Securitization Forum’s<br />

May event was expecting up to 4,000 people<br />

– and international trade associations such as<br />

SFIG are actively building bridges and sharing<br />

knowledge,” says Mertl.<br />

He continues: “The biggest hurdle to the<br />

market’s development is arguably regulatory<br />

caution, but mark my words, foot-dragging<br />

is not an issue; Chinese regulators are keen<br />

to see securitisation markets form. But to<br />

Exhibit 1: Chinese securitisation issuance is growing | Total ABS issuance volume (under different schemes)<br />

700<br />

100<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Q1 2012<br />

Q2 2012<br />

Q3 2012<br />

Q4 2012<br />

Q1 2013<br />

Q2 2013<br />

Q3 2013<br />

Q4 2013<br />

Q1 2014<br />

CNY (billions)<br />

CAS / ABSP / ABN to total issuance (%)<br />

Q2 2014<br />

Q3 2014<br />

Q4 2014<br />

Q1 2015<br />

Q2 2015<br />

Q3 2015<br />

Q4 2015<br />

Q1 2016<br />

Q2 2016<br />

Q3 2016<br />

Q4 2016<br />

Q1 2017<br />

Q2 2017<br />

Q3 2017<br />

Q4 2017<br />

CAS issuance<br />

% of CAS to total issuance (full year, RHS)<br />

Source: Moody’s Investors Service<br />

ABSP issuance<br />

% of ABSP to total issuance (full year, RHS)<br />

ABN issuance<br />

% of ABN to total issuance (full year, RHS)<br />

10 <strong>SCI</strong> <strong>Magazine</strong> | <strong>Summer</strong> <strong>2018</strong> www.structuredcreditinvestor.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!