Initiative for Europe Handbook 2008
The guide to transnational democracy in Europe
The guide to transnational democracy in Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INITIATIVE FOR EUROPE<br />
No Turkey without “Copenhagen”<br />
What the French President Nicolas Sarkozy tried to emphasize during his election<br />
campaign is backed up by a signature gathering campaign with roots in the new EU member<br />
states of central and eastern <strong>Europe</strong>. The “Voice <strong>for</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>” <strong>Initiative</strong> focuses on the question<br />
of further EU-enlargement, notably with Turkey, writes Daniella Csizmadia and Jan Wójcik.<br />
At the <strong>Europe</strong>an Council meeting in Copenhagen on the 12th and 13th of December 2002, the<br />
decision was taken that in December 2004 the Council would evaluate Turkey’s application <strong>for</strong> EU<br />
membership and on the basis of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s recommendation decide whether to<br />
open accession negotiations or not. The condition <strong>for</strong> opening negotiations was Turkey’s fulfilment<br />
of the political criteria of Copenhagen, including the stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy,<br />
the rule of law, human rights, respect <strong>for</strong> and protection of minorities - the basic requirement <strong>for</strong> all<br />
applicant countries.<br />
Be<strong>for</strong>e the <strong>Europe</strong>an Council summit on 17th December 2004, the Commission published a country<br />
report on Turkey in which a number of human rights violations, in particular regarding ethnic and<br />
religious minorities, were listed. Nonetheless, the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission concluded that Turkey had<br />
“sufficiently” fulfilled the criteria and recommended opening the negotiations.<br />
This political decision has serious consequences <strong>for</strong> the integration, security and prosperity of the EU,<br />
as well as <strong>for</strong> the stability of its political institutions.<br />
The 2005 Eurobarometer, a survey conducted by the Commission, clearly showed that 52% of EU<br />
citizens were opposed to Turkey’s EU membership. However, the citizens’ views on EU enlargement<br />
were not taken into consideration in this political process.<br />
For the above-mentioned reasons, plus a wide range of other concerns regarding Turkey’s suitability <strong>for</strong><br />
EU membership, and with the aim of ensuring democratic decision- making on this important issue,<br />
several <strong>Europe</strong>an civil organizations and individuals decided to establish a pan-<strong>Europe</strong>an movement<br />
and launch a campaign on 9th May 2005. The goal of the campaign was to block the launch of negotiations<br />
with Turkey planned to take place on 3rd October 2005 and to search <strong>for</strong> an alternative <strong>for</strong>m<br />
of cooperation with Turkey other than full EU membership.<br />
Putting pressure on the EU to strictly apply the Copenhagen criteria also <strong>for</strong> Turkey<br />
The original goal of the campaign was to use a democratic tool to collect 1 million signatures<br />
through a petition and block the commencement of negotiations with Turkey on 3rd October 2005.<br />
We also intended to raise the awareness of <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens about the controversial facts surrounding<br />
the issue of EU enlargement with Turkey and get them actively involved in shaping the future of<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>.<br />
We planned to expand our network of civil organizations which share similar aims and concerns in<br />
countries where we had no established contacts. In this way we wished to gain wider support from<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an citizens.<br />
An equally important part of our goal was to reach out to the <strong>Europe</strong>an political decision makers in<br />
order to make them listen to and take <strong>Europe</strong>an public opinion into consideration and allow <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />
citizens to play a role in the enlargement process<br />
Despite our ef<strong>for</strong>ts the negotiations were officially opened on the 3rd /4th October 2005 after which<br />
we had to redefine our main goal. The new aim now is to work as a monitoring group and put pressure<br />
on the EU to strictly apply the Copenhagen criteria also <strong>for</strong> Turkey, and/or stop the negotiations.<br />
Instead, a new framework <strong>for</strong> future cooperation between the EU and Turkey should be set. We<br />
suggest that a special partnership status, still to be defined, would be a more suitable and fruitful way<br />
of cooperation.<br />
39