09.05.2019 Views

Initiative for Europe Handbook 2008

The guide to transnational democracy in Europe

The guide to transnational democracy in Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INITIATIVE FOR EUROPE<br />

No Turkey without “Copenhagen”<br />

What the French President Nicolas Sarkozy tried to emphasize during his election<br />

campaign is backed up by a signature gathering campaign with roots in the new EU member<br />

states of central and eastern <strong>Europe</strong>. The “Voice <strong>for</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>” <strong>Initiative</strong> focuses on the question<br />

of further EU-enlargement, notably with Turkey, writes Daniella Csizmadia and Jan Wójcik.<br />

At the <strong>Europe</strong>an Council meeting in Copenhagen on the 12th and 13th of December 2002, the<br />

decision was taken that in December 2004 the Council would evaluate Turkey’s application <strong>for</strong> EU<br />

membership and on the basis of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission’s recommendation decide whether to<br />

open accession negotiations or not. The condition <strong>for</strong> opening negotiations was Turkey’s fulfilment<br />

of the political criteria of Copenhagen, including the stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy,<br />

the rule of law, human rights, respect <strong>for</strong> and protection of minorities - the basic requirement <strong>for</strong> all<br />

applicant countries.<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e the <strong>Europe</strong>an Council summit on 17th December 2004, the Commission published a country<br />

report on Turkey in which a number of human rights violations, in particular regarding ethnic and<br />

religious minorities, were listed. Nonetheless, the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission concluded that Turkey had<br />

“sufficiently” fulfilled the criteria and recommended opening the negotiations.<br />

This political decision has serious consequences <strong>for</strong> the integration, security and prosperity of the EU,<br />

as well as <strong>for</strong> the stability of its political institutions.<br />

The 2005 Eurobarometer, a survey conducted by the Commission, clearly showed that 52% of EU<br />

citizens were opposed to Turkey’s EU membership. However, the citizens’ views on EU enlargement<br />

were not taken into consideration in this political process.<br />

For the above-mentioned reasons, plus a wide range of other concerns regarding Turkey’s suitability <strong>for</strong><br />

EU membership, and with the aim of ensuring democratic decision- making on this important issue,<br />

several <strong>Europe</strong>an civil organizations and individuals decided to establish a pan-<strong>Europe</strong>an movement<br />

and launch a campaign on 9th May 2005. The goal of the campaign was to block the launch of negotiations<br />

with Turkey planned to take place on 3rd October 2005 and to search <strong>for</strong> an alternative <strong>for</strong>m<br />

of cooperation with Turkey other than full EU membership.<br />

Putting pressure on the EU to strictly apply the Copenhagen criteria also <strong>for</strong> Turkey<br />

The original goal of the campaign was to use a democratic tool to collect 1 million signatures<br />

through a petition and block the commencement of negotiations with Turkey on 3rd October 2005.<br />

We also intended to raise the awareness of <strong>Europe</strong>an citizens about the controversial facts surrounding<br />

the issue of EU enlargement with Turkey and get them actively involved in shaping the future of<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>.<br />

We planned to expand our network of civil organizations which share similar aims and concerns in<br />

countries where we had no established contacts. In this way we wished to gain wider support from<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>an citizens.<br />

An equally important part of our goal was to reach out to the <strong>Europe</strong>an political decision makers in<br />

order to make them listen to and take <strong>Europe</strong>an public opinion into consideration and allow <strong>Europe</strong>an<br />

citizens to play a role in the enlargement process<br />

Despite our ef<strong>for</strong>ts the negotiations were officially opened on the 3rd /4th October 2005 after which<br />

we had to redefine our main goal. The new aim now is to work as a monitoring group and put pressure<br />

on the EU to strictly apply the Copenhagen criteria also <strong>for</strong> Turkey, and/or stop the negotiations.<br />

Instead, a new framework <strong>for</strong> future cooperation between the EU and Turkey should be set. We<br />

suggest that a special partnership status, still to be defined, would be a more suitable and fruitful way<br />

of cooperation.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!