28.07.2019 Views

DT_20190729

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A4 COMMENTARY<br />

Monday, 29 July 2019<br />

Daily Tribune<br />

Yellow<br />

rape victim<br />

“Philippine<br />

Charity<br />

Sweepstakes<br />

Office was<br />

turned into<br />

a pigsty<br />

by these<br />

syndicates<br />

and<br />

gangsters,<br />

the lotto<br />

was used<br />

to cover up<br />

‘jueteng.’<br />

Daily<br />

Tribune<br />

WITHOUT FEAR • WITHOUT FAVOR<br />

WITHOUT FEAR • WITHOUT FAVOR<br />

Chito Lozada<br />

Aldrin Cardona<br />

Dinah Ventura<br />

John Henry Dodson<br />

Roy Pelovello<br />

Larry Payawal<br />

Komfie Manalo<br />

Geraldine Datoy<br />

Patricia Ramos<br />

Board Chair<br />

Willie Fernandez<br />

Publisher and President<br />

Executive Editor<br />

Managing Editor<br />

Associate Editor<br />

Digital Editor<br />

Central Desk Editor<br />

Central Desk<br />

Advertising<br />

and Marketing<br />

Sometime in November 2010, then President Noynoy<br />

Aquino issued Executive Order (EO) 14, which placed<br />

the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) under<br />

the direct supervision of the Office of the President.<br />

The lotto operator before that was under<br />

the wings of the Department of Social<br />

Welfare and Development.<br />

The EO stated that the transfer was<br />

meant to ensure the effective implementation of<br />

the social agenda of the President.<br />

From then on, the corruption binge<br />

started, resulting in an estimated loss<br />

for government of over P7 billion a<br />

year.<br />

A Department of Justice estimate<br />

showed the government has been<br />

foregoing P20 million a day just<br />

from the Small Town Lottery<br />

(STL) program, which jueteng<br />

operators used as a front or a<br />

camouflage.<br />

President Rody Duterte’s men<br />

are also checking on suspicions of<br />

underreporting of revenues.<br />

Last Friday, Rody ordered all<br />

PCSO operations stopped due to<br />

massive corruption that, according to<br />

presidential spokesman Sal Panelo,<br />

involved “all players” that should<br />

include some of the current<br />

officials in the agency.<br />

Panelo said the “grand conspiracy”<br />

among major players and enforcers of these<br />

government-sanctioned gaming activities and enterprises<br />

must be stopped from cheating the government of its<br />

rightful shares.<br />

When he assumed the presidency, among the first<br />

moves of Rody was to instruct former Justice Secretary<br />

Vitaliano Aguirre II to look into the fraud operations<br />

among STL operators.<br />

Aguirre’s findings included massive<br />

“cheating on the government” as<br />

“Rody has<br />

only one operators remit only from 10 percent to<br />

choice, which 15 percent of their revenues to the PCSO.<br />

is to stop The fraud happened since jueteng<br />

the illegal operators were allowed by the previous<br />

activities<br />

regime to also run the STL scheme in<br />

within the<br />

agency and their localities.<br />

thus restore “The government is supposed to have<br />

its credibility large revenues, but they were diminished<br />

in the process. because of the inaccurate reporting and<br />

bad remittance procedures,” Rody said.<br />

“As a matter of fact, this Philippine Charity<br />

Sweepstakes Office was turned into a pigsty by these<br />

syndicates and gangsters, the lotto was used to cover<br />

up jueteng. They were granted a right by the previous<br />

government and they merged it,” he added.<br />

Shortly after winning the presidency, Duterte said<br />

that he wanted a “killer” to replace former Cavite<br />

Governor Erineo Maliksi, a Liberal Party stalwart, who<br />

was charged with graft over the extension of contracts<br />

for the lease of lottery terminals without public bidding.<br />

“PCSO is a corrupt agency. I am looking for a killer<br />

to head this agency. Those bingo games that they hold,<br />

the lotto and jueteng, that is the racket,” he said.<br />

The crackdown in the operations of PCSO is expected<br />

to have a strong impact on the integrity of its betting<br />

operations, since the perception would be that all of<br />

the gambling operations are tampered with.<br />

Rody, however, has only one choice, which is to stop<br />

the illegal activities within the agency and thus restore<br />

its credibility in the process.<br />

The PCSO appears to have been milked dry during<br />

the previous administration and its remnants that Rody<br />

seems bent on weeding them out.<br />

With the ingrained corruption in the agency, Rody’s<br />

plan to have it abolished makes a lot of sense.<br />

“Why<br />

then have<br />

a law that<br />

rewards<br />

even the<br />

incompetent,<br />

the lazy, the<br />

rabble-rousing<br />

employee<br />

who would<br />

be protected<br />

by this SoT<br />

bill?<br />

“Violations<br />

of anti-age<br />

discrimination<br />

laws may<br />

come in<br />

the form of<br />

underhanded<br />

methods<br />

calculated<br />

to<br />

encourage<br />

older<br />

workers<br />

to leave<br />

their jobs,<br />

such as job<br />

reassignment.<br />

With the presidential<br />

veto putting an end to<br />

the Security of Tenure<br />

(SoT) bill, several<br />

senators expressed their<br />

disappointment, with<br />

some even threatening<br />

to refile the vetoed bill,<br />

which is a useless move.<br />

Joel Villanueva,<br />

who pushed for the<br />

SoT bill, issued a<br />

statement, which<br />

slammed last week’s<br />

veto by President Duterte,<br />

saying that his measure widened<br />

the definition of labor-only<br />

contracting, prohibited legitimate<br />

job contracting, and prevented<br />

business from contracting out<br />

services without basis.<br />

Villanueva and other like-minded<br />

senators can be as ferocious as they<br />

want, since they are not seeking<br />

reelection in 2022, when their second<br />

term ends.<br />

Villanueva and 11 incumbent<br />

senators will all have to retire for<br />

three years, and no longer have to<br />

kiss the presidential ass until, of<br />

course, the new presidential election<br />

brings forth a new leader, whom<br />

these same current senators will bow<br />

to and pledge allegiance to the new<br />

president’s paper party and be part<br />

of the ruling party that ends with<br />

that president’s term.<br />

FRONTLINE<br />

Ninez Cacho-Olivares<br />

Age may just be a number but<br />

in reality, it can be a determining<br />

factor for employment. It cannot be<br />

denied that preference may be given<br />

to youthful vigor in certain industries,<br />

as opposed to elderly candidates who<br />

otherwise possess long experience.<br />

On the other hand, employers would<br />

often prefer to place in positions of<br />

power those who are more senior in<br />

their years, than equally if not more<br />

qualified, but younger, candidates.<br />

The employer has a prerogative and<br />

preference in hiring employees, but the<br />

law ensures that an employee’s right<br />

to equal opportunities is respected.<br />

Hence, this article discusses the<br />

prohibition on selective age preference<br />

in labor and employment.<br />

Republic Act 10911, the Anti-Age<br />

Discrimination in Employment Act,<br />

generally considers as unlawful acts<br />

which consider age as a determining<br />

factor in hiring, compensation and<br />

benefits, separation, and other aspects<br />

of employment.<br />

Aptly, the law mirrors state policy to<br />

promote employment of individuals on<br />

the basis of their abilities, knowledge,<br />

skills and qualifications, rather than<br />

their age. The law frowns upon arbitrary<br />

age limitations in employment in<br />

order to promote the right of all<br />

employees and workers, regardless of<br />

age, to be treated equally in terms of<br />

compensation, benefits, promotion,<br />

training and other employment<br />

opportunities.<br />

The law cuts no corners for it<br />

covers the very start of hiring process,<br />

i.e., from the time an employer<br />

publishes or sets out a notice of<br />

hiring together with a candidate’s<br />

minimum qualifications. The employer<br />

cannot suggest preferences, limitations,<br />

specifications and discrimination based<br />

on age in the notice of hiring or any<br />

other advertisement for the position.<br />

While job seekers are free to<br />

place their age and birthdates in<br />

their respective information sheets,<br />

employers cannot require them to<br />

disclose their age or birth date during<br />

the application process. Likewise,<br />

employers are prohibited from declining<br />

any employment application because of<br />

Keep politics out<br />

That’s the usual route<br />

taken by most Filipino<br />

politicians, then and now.<br />

But it certainly looks<br />

like Villanueva has issued<br />

his statement to refile his<br />

“endo” bill for publicity<br />

purposes, since he must<br />

know that, even if majority<br />

of his colleagues in the<br />

Senate join him, for the<br />

refilled bill to succeed,<br />

the senators must get the<br />

House members to refile<br />

a complementary bill that will still be<br />

vetoed by Duterte.<br />

However, even as the senators<br />

know that what Villanueva aims to<br />

do in his bid to save the SoT bill, he<br />

still trudges on, saying, “While we<br />

respect the presidential prerogative,<br />

we maintain that the grounds of the<br />

veto are weak, if not flimsy.” He<br />

added that what the Palace did was<br />

to conjure up a malevolent ghost to<br />

cloak the people with fear.<br />

Villanueva also stressed that<br />

the presidential veto on the SoT<br />

bill reflected the growing problem<br />

of misinformation and confusion in<br />

government.<br />

But it seems that if Duterte<br />

is confused and misinformed,<br />

Villanueva appears to be even more<br />

confused and misinformed because,<br />

if the senator truly believes that his<br />

bill is not baseless, what he can do<br />

is to get House SoT endorsers, as well<br />

as the senators together, the required<br />

number to override the presidential<br />

veto instead of coming up<br />

with the cheap political<br />

stunt that will lead<br />

to his bill and<br />

threat getting<br />

nowhere.<br />

the individual’s age and<br />

to discriminate against<br />

him/her in terms of<br />

compensation, terms and<br />

conditions or privileges of<br />

employment on account<br />

of such age.<br />

Needless to say,<br />

employers cannot forcibly<br />

lay off an employee or<br />

worker because of old<br />

age or impose early<br />

retirement on the basis<br />

of such employee’s or<br />

worker’s age.<br />

The rule covers not just traditional<br />

employers, but even labor contractors<br />

and subcontractors. In apt cases, even<br />

labor organizations are prohibited from<br />

declining to accept as its member any<br />

person on the basis of his age.<br />

As with any<br />

rule, the law admits<br />

of reasonable<br />

exceptions. Hence, age<br />

may be a primordial<br />

factor for hiring<br />

when age is a bona<br />

fide occupational<br />

qualification<br />

reasonably necessary<br />

in the normal<br />

operation of a<br />

particular business<br />

or where the<br />

differentiation is<br />

based on reasonable<br />

factors other than age,<br />

or when the intent is<br />

to observe the terms<br />

“Employer<br />

cannot<br />

suggest<br />

preferences,<br />

limitations,<br />

specifications<br />

and<br />

discrimination<br />

based on age<br />

in the notice<br />

of hiring or<br />

any other<br />

advertisement<br />

for the<br />

position.<br />

of a bona fide seniority system that is not<br />

intended to evade the purpose of the law.<br />

Further, acts with a view to observing<br />

the terms of a bona fide employee<br />

retirement or a voluntary early retirement<br />

plan is excepted, provided that such<br />

retirement or voluntary retirement plan<br />

is in accordance with the Labor Code, as<br />

amended, and other related laws.<br />

Violations of anti-age discrimination<br />

laws may come in the form of<br />

underhanded methods calculated<br />

to encourage older workers to leave<br />

their jobs, such as job reassignment,<br />

giving of unfair performance reviews,<br />

withholding of reasonable workplace<br />

A lot of these politicians are in it to<br />

portray themselves as the saviors of the<br />

workers in the country to strengthen<br />

their campaign for elective seats in<br />

2022, including outgoing senators like<br />

Villanueva, a loyal yellow presidential<br />

bootlicker up till 2016, when he and<br />

other yellows like him suddenly<br />

swore allegiance to the presidential<br />

political party.<br />

But not to worry, since Villanueva<br />

no doubt will again shed his PDP<br />

colors and get a new political coat<br />

aligned with a new president.<br />

In crafting bills,<br />

all these legislators<br />

appear to think about<br />

is their carefully<br />

crafted image of<br />

being for the people.<br />

This particular SoT<br />

bill — the laborers,<br />

who, even when<br />

some of them are<br />

clearly incompetent<br />

“Villanueva<br />

has issued<br />

his statement<br />

to refile his<br />

“endo” bill<br />

for publicity<br />

purposes.<br />

and non-productive and should be<br />

given the boot, are given the guarantee<br />

of job permanency — will make it<br />

almost impossible for management<br />

to fire them for cause, or even cause<br />

management to close shop, usually due<br />

at times to impossible demands.<br />

When our Filipino workers go<br />

abroad, they have no job permanency,<br />

yet they have proven themselves to<br />

be very productive workers. Why<br />

should they be given the SoT bill in<br />

their own country, especially when<br />

some workers have proven to be<br />

unproductive in their own land?<br />

Why then have a law that rewards<br />

even the incompetent, the lazy, the<br />

rabble-rousing employee who would<br />

be protected by this SoT bill?<br />

Such a law would definitely<br />

have all foreign and even local<br />

businessmen shy away from investing<br />

in this country. And even labor knows,<br />

or ought to know, if they don’t know it<br />

yet, that without investments coming<br />

in, or businesses closing up, they<br />

would be worse off, as they would<br />

not only have their jobs, but worse,<br />

would no longer have any money to<br />

even pay for their SSS, Pag-IBIG and<br />

PhilHealth fees, as they have no jobs<br />

where management used to foot all<br />

these fees. Worst of all, these workers<br />

won’t have any money to feed their<br />

family members.<br />

There has to be a balance reached<br />

between labor and management, but<br />

definitely, imposing such a one-way<br />

SoT bill to get the votes for either<br />

their senatorial reelection and a get<br />

a fresh mandate after a three-year<br />

hiatus is what can really be called a<br />

threat to economic growth.<br />

Labor and management should<br />

learn to give and take and reach a<br />

balance by themselves.<br />

It can be done if this pesky<br />

politics gets out of the picture.<br />

Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Act<br />

accommodations, or<br />

any other act with a<br />

goal of getting older<br />

employees to quit<br />

while being able to<br />

assert voluntariness<br />

of such action. In<br />

such instances, the<br />

concept of constructive<br />

dismissal is relevant by<br />

way of analogy.<br />

Constructive<br />

dismissal is defined as<br />

quitting or cessation of<br />

work because continued employment<br />

is rendered impossible, unreasonable<br />

or unlikely; when there is a demotion<br />

in rank or a diminution of pay and<br />

other benefits. It exists if an act of<br />

clear discrimination, insensibility, or<br />

disdain by an employer becomes so<br />

unbearable on the part of the employee<br />

that it could foreclose any choice by<br />

him except to forego his continued<br />

employment. The test of constructive<br />

dismissal is whether a reasonable<br />

person in the employee’s position<br />

would have felt compelled to give up<br />

his employment/position under the<br />

circumstances.<br />

Hence, if the “voluntary” separation<br />

or retirement is not necessarily<br />

voluntarily but a by-product of a<br />

maneuvering to force an employee to<br />

leave based on his age, the employer is<br />

not only liable for violation of the Labor<br />

Code, but also of RA 10911.<br />

If found guilty, the erring party may<br />

be punished with a fine ranging from<br />

P50,000 to P500,000, or imprisonment<br />

of three months to two years, or both,<br />

at the discretion of the court. If the<br />

offense is committed by a corporation,<br />

trust, firm, partnership or association<br />

or other entity, the penalty shall be<br />

imposed upon the guilty officer or<br />

officers of such corporation, trust, firm,<br />

partnership or association or entity.<br />

Non-compliant companies may be<br />

reported to the nearest regional or<br />

provincial offices of the Department<br />

of Labor and Employment, where<br />

discriminated employees may be given<br />

assistance in the filing of cases.<br />

A DOSE OF LAW<br />

Dean Nilo Divina<br />

Email: cabdo@divinalaw.com<br />

Published daily by the Daily Tribune Publishing Co., with offices at 3450 Concept Bldg., Florida Street, Makati City • Editorial: (02) 831-0496 • Administration: dailytribune@tribune.net.ph, (02) 833-7085 / (02) 551-5148. To advertise and subscribe: ads@tribune.net.ph, dailytribune@tribune.net.ph, (02) 833-7085 / (02)<br />

551-5148. To submit an opinion article, email opinion@tribune.net.ph. To submit a letter to the editor, email: letters@tribune.net.ph • News: news@tribune.net.ph • Metro: metro@tribune.net.ph • Lifestyle: lifestyle@tribune.net.ph • Business: biz@tribune.net.ph • Sports: sports@tribune.net.ph • PR: pr@tribune.net.ph.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!