DT_20190729
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A4 COMMENTARY<br />
Monday, 29 July 2019<br />
Daily Tribune<br />
Yellow<br />
rape victim<br />
“Philippine<br />
Charity<br />
Sweepstakes<br />
Office was<br />
turned into<br />
a pigsty<br />
by these<br />
syndicates<br />
and<br />
gangsters,<br />
the lotto<br />
was used<br />
to cover up<br />
‘jueteng.’<br />
Daily<br />
Tribune<br />
WITHOUT FEAR • WITHOUT FAVOR<br />
WITHOUT FEAR • WITHOUT FAVOR<br />
Chito Lozada<br />
Aldrin Cardona<br />
Dinah Ventura<br />
John Henry Dodson<br />
Roy Pelovello<br />
Larry Payawal<br />
Komfie Manalo<br />
Geraldine Datoy<br />
Patricia Ramos<br />
Board Chair<br />
Willie Fernandez<br />
Publisher and President<br />
Executive Editor<br />
Managing Editor<br />
Associate Editor<br />
Digital Editor<br />
Central Desk Editor<br />
Central Desk<br />
Advertising<br />
and Marketing<br />
Sometime in November 2010, then President Noynoy<br />
Aquino issued Executive Order (EO) 14, which placed<br />
the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) under<br />
the direct supervision of the Office of the President.<br />
The lotto operator before that was under<br />
the wings of the Department of Social<br />
Welfare and Development.<br />
The EO stated that the transfer was<br />
meant to ensure the effective implementation of<br />
the social agenda of the President.<br />
From then on, the corruption binge<br />
started, resulting in an estimated loss<br />
for government of over P7 billion a<br />
year.<br />
A Department of Justice estimate<br />
showed the government has been<br />
foregoing P20 million a day just<br />
from the Small Town Lottery<br />
(STL) program, which jueteng<br />
operators used as a front or a<br />
camouflage.<br />
President Rody Duterte’s men<br />
are also checking on suspicions of<br />
underreporting of revenues.<br />
Last Friday, Rody ordered all<br />
PCSO operations stopped due to<br />
massive corruption that, according to<br />
presidential spokesman Sal Panelo,<br />
involved “all players” that should<br />
include some of the current<br />
officials in the agency.<br />
Panelo said the “grand conspiracy”<br />
among major players and enforcers of these<br />
government-sanctioned gaming activities and enterprises<br />
must be stopped from cheating the government of its<br />
rightful shares.<br />
When he assumed the presidency, among the first<br />
moves of Rody was to instruct former Justice Secretary<br />
Vitaliano Aguirre II to look into the fraud operations<br />
among STL operators.<br />
Aguirre’s findings included massive<br />
“cheating on the government” as<br />
“Rody has<br />
only one operators remit only from 10 percent to<br />
choice, which 15 percent of their revenues to the PCSO.<br />
is to stop The fraud happened since jueteng<br />
the illegal operators were allowed by the previous<br />
activities<br />
regime to also run the STL scheme in<br />
within the<br />
agency and their localities.<br />
thus restore “The government is supposed to have<br />
its credibility large revenues, but they were diminished<br />
in the process. because of the inaccurate reporting and<br />
bad remittance procedures,” Rody said.<br />
“As a matter of fact, this Philippine Charity<br />
Sweepstakes Office was turned into a pigsty by these<br />
syndicates and gangsters, the lotto was used to cover<br />
up jueteng. They were granted a right by the previous<br />
government and they merged it,” he added.<br />
Shortly after winning the presidency, Duterte said<br />
that he wanted a “killer” to replace former Cavite<br />
Governor Erineo Maliksi, a Liberal Party stalwart, who<br />
was charged with graft over the extension of contracts<br />
for the lease of lottery terminals without public bidding.<br />
“PCSO is a corrupt agency. I am looking for a killer<br />
to head this agency. Those bingo games that they hold,<br />
the lotto and jueteng, that is the racket,” he said.<br />
The crackdown in the operations of PCSO is expected<br />
to have a strong impact on the integrity of its betting<br />
operations, since the perception would be that all of<br />
the gambling operations are tampered with.<br />
Rody, however, has only one choice, which is to stop<br />
the illegal activities within the agency and thus restore<br />
its credibility in the process.<br />
The PCSO appears to have been milked dry during<br />
the previous administration and its remnants that Rody<br />
seems bent on weeding them out.<br />
With the ingrained corruption in the agency, Rody’s<br />
plan to have it abolished makes a lot of sense.<br />
“Why<br />
then have<br />
a law that<br />
rewards<br />
even the<br />
incompetent,<br />
the lazy, the<br />
rabble-rousing<br />
employee<br />
who would<br />
be protected<br />
by this SoT<br />
bill?<br />
“Violations<br />
of anti-age<br />
discrimination<br />
laws may<br />
come in<br />
the form of<br />
underhanded<br />
methods<br />
calculated<br />
to<br />
encourage<br />
older<br />
workers<br />
to leave<br />
their jobs,<br />
such as job<br />
reassignment.<br />
With the presidential<br />
veto putting an end to<br />
the Security of Tenure<br />
(SoT) bill, several<br />
senators expressed their<br />
disappointment, with<br />
some even threatening<br />
to refile the vetoed bill,<br />
which is a useless move.<br />
Joel Villanueva,<br />
who pushed for the<br />
SoT bill, issued a<br />
statement, which<br />
slammed last week’s<br />
veto by President Duterte,<br />
saying that his measure widened<br />
the definition of labor-only<br />
contracting, prohibited legitimate<br />
job contracting, and prevented<br />
business from contracting out<br />
services without basis.<br />
Villanueva and other like-minded<br />
senators can be as ferocious as they<br />
want, since they are not seeking<br />
reelection in 2022, when their second<br />
term ends.<br />
Villanueva and 11 incumbent<br />
senators will all have to retire for<br />
three years, and no longer have to<br />
kiss the presidential ass until, of<br />
course, the new presidential election<br />
brings forth a new leader, whom<br />
these same current senators will bow<br />
to and pledge allegiance to the new<br />
president’s paper party and be part<br />
of the ruling party that ends with<br />
that president’s term.<br />
FRONTLINE<br />
Ninez Cacho-Olivares<br />
Age may just be a number but<br />
in reality, it can be a determining<br />
factor for employment. It cannot be<br />
denied that preference may be given<br />
to youthful vigor in certain industries,<br />
as opposed to elderly candidates who<br />
otherwise possess long experience.<br />
On the other hand, employers would<br />
often prefer to place in positions of<br />
power those who are more senior in<br />
their years, than equally if not more<br />
qualified, but younger, candidates.<br />
The employer has a prerogative and<br />
preference in hiring employees, but the<br />
law ensures that an employee’s right<br />
to equal opportunities is respected.<br />
Hence, this article discusses the<br />
prohibition on selective age preference<br />
in labor and employment.<br />
Republic Act 10911, the Anti-Age<br />
Discrimination in Employment Act,<br />
generally considers as unlawful acts<br />
which consider age as a determining<br />
factor in hiring, compensation and<br />
benefits, separation, and other aspects<br />
of employment.<br />
Aptly, the law mirrors state policy to<br />
promote employment of individuals on<br />
the basis of their abilities, knowledge,<br />
skills and qualifications, rather than<br />
their age. The law frowns upon arbitrary<br />
age limitations in employment in<br />
order to promote the right of all<br />
employees and workers, regardless of<br />
age, to be treated equally in terms of<br />
compensation, benefits, promotion,<br />
training and other employment<br />
opportunities.<br />
The law cuts no corners for it<br />
covers the very start of hiring process,<br />
i.e., from the time an employer<br />
publishes or sets out a notice of<br />
hiring together with a candidate’s<br />
minimum qualifications. The employer<br />
cannot suggest preferences, limitations,<br />
specifications and discrimination based<br />
on age in the notice of hiring or any<br />
other advertisement for the position.<br />
While job seekers are free to<br />
place their age and birthdates in<br />
their respective information sheets,<br />
employers cannot require them to<br />
disclose their age or birth date during<br />
the application process. Likewise,<br />
employers are prohibited from declining<br />
any employment application because of<br />
Keep politics out<br />
That’s the usual route<br />
taken by most Filipino<br />
politicians, then and now.<br />
But it certainly looks<br />
like Villanueva has issued<br />
his statement to refile his<br />
“endo” bill for publicity<br />
purposes, since he must<br />
know that, even if majority<br />
of his colleagues in the<br />
Senate join him, for the<br />
refilled bill to succeed,<br />
the senators must get the<br />
House members to refile<br />
a complementary bill that will still be<br />
vetoed by Duterte.<br />
However, even as the senators<br />
know that what Villanueva aims to<br />
do in his bid to save the SoT bill, he<br />
still trudges on, saying, “While we<br />
respect the presidential prerogative,<br />
we maintain that the grounds of the<br />
veto are weak, if not flimsy.” He<br />
added that what the Palace did was<br />
to conjure up a malevolent ghost to<br />
cloak the people with fear.<br />
Villanueva also stressed that<br />
the presidential veto on the SoT<br />
bill reflected the growing problem<br />
of misinformation and confusion in<br />
government.<br />
But it seems that if Duterte<br />
is confused and misinformed,<br />
Villanueva appears to be even more<br />
confused and misinformed because,<br />
if the senator truly believes that his<br />
bill is not baseless, what he can do<br />
is to get House SoT endorsers, as well<br />
as the senators together, the required<br />
number to override the presidential<br />
veto instead of coming up<br />
with the cheap political<br />
stunt that will lead<br />
to his bill and<br />
threat getting<br />
nowhere.<br />
the individual’s age and<br />
to discriminate against<br />
him/her in terms of<br />
compensation, terms and<br />
conditions or privileges of<br />
employment on account<br />
of such age.<br />
Needless to say,<br />
employers cannot forcibly<br />
lay off an employee or<br />
worker because of old<br />
age or impose early<br />
retirement on the basis<br />
of such employee’s or<br />
worker’s age.<br />
The rule covers not just traditional<br />
employers, but even labor contractors<br />
and subcontractors. In apt cases, even<br />
labor organizations are prohibited from<br />
declining to accept as its member any<br />
person on the basis of his age.<br />
As with any<br />
rule, the law admits<br />
of reasonable<br />
exceptions. Hence, age<br />
may be a primordial<br />
factor for hiring<br />
when age is a bona<br />
fide occupational<br />
qualification<br />
reasonably necessary<br />
in the normal<br />
operation of a<br />
particular business<br />
or where the<br />
differentiation is<br />
based on reasonable<br />
factors other than age,<br />
or when the intent is<br />
to observe the terms<br />
“Employer<br />
cannot<br />
suggest<br />
preferences,<br />
limitations,<br />
specifications<br />
and<br />
discrimination<br />
based on age<br />
in the notice<br />
of hiring or<br />
any other<br />
advertisement<br />
for the<br />
position.<br />
of a bona fide seniority system that is not<br />
intended to evade the purpose of the law.<br />
Further, acts with a view to observing<br />
the terms of a bona fide employee<br />
retirement or a voluntary early retirement<br />
plan is excepted, provided that such<br />
retirement or voluntary retirement plan<br />
is in accordance with the Labor Code, as<br />
amended, and other related laws.<br />
Violations of anti-age discrimination<br />
laws may come in the form of<br />
underhanded methods calculated<br />
to encourage older workers to leave<br />
their jobs, such as job reassignment,<br />
giving of unfair performance reviews,<br />
withholding of reasonable workplace<br />
A lot of these politicians are in it to<br />
portray themselves as the saviors of the<br />
workers in the country to strengthen<br />
their campaign for elective seats in<br />
2022, including outgoing senators like<br />
Villanueva, a loyal yellow presidential<br />
bootlicker up till 2016, when he and<br />
other yellows like him suddenly<br />
swore allegiance to the presidential<br />
political party.<br />
But not to worry, since Villanueva<br />
no doubt will again shed his PDP<br />
colors and get a new political coat<br />
aligned with a new president.<br />
In crafting bills,<br />
all these legislators<br />
appear to think about<br />
is their carefully<br />
crafted image of<br />
being for the people.<br />
This particular SoT<br />
bill — the laborers,<br />
who, even when<br />
some of them are<br />
clearly incompetent<br />
“Villanueva<br />
has issued<br />
his statement<br />
to refile his<br />
“endo” bill<br />
for publicity<br />
purposes.<br />
and non-productive and should be<br />
given the boot, are given the guarantee<br />
of job permanency — will make it<br />
almost impossible for management<br />
to fire them for cause, or even cause<br />
management to close shop, usually due<br />
at times to impossible demands.<br />
When our Filipino workers go<br />
abroad, they have no job permanency,<br />
yet they have proven themselves to<br />
be very productive workers. Why<br />
should they be given the SoT bill in<br />
their own country, especially when<br />
some workers have proven to be<br />
unproductive in their own land?<br />
Why then have a law that rewards<br />
even the incompetent, the lazy, the<br />
rabble-rousing employee who would<br />
be protected by this SoT bill?<br />
Such a law would definitely<br />
have all foreign and even local<br />
businessmen shy away from investing<br />
in this country. And even labor knows,<br />
or ought to know, if they don’t know it<br />
yet, that without investments coming<br />
in, or businesses closing up, they<br />
would be worse off, as they would<br />
not only have their jobs, but worse,<br />
would no longer have any money to<br />
even pay for their SSS, Pag-IBIG and<br />
PhilHealth fees, as they have no jobs<br />
where management used to foot all<br />
these fees. Worst of all, these workers<br />
won’t have any money to feed their<br />
family members.<br />
There has to be a balance reached<br />
between labor and management, but<br />
definitely, imposing such a one-way<br />
SoT bill to get the votes for either<br />
their senatorial reelection and a get<br />
a fresh mandate after a three-year<br />
hiatus is what can really be called a<br />
threat to economic growth.<br />
Labor and management should<br />
learn to give and take and reach a<br />
balance by themselves.<br />
It can be done if this pesky<br />
politics gets out of the picture.<br />
Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Act<br />
accommodations, or<br />
any other act with a<br />
goal of getting older<br />
employees to quit<br />
while being able to<br />
assert voluntariness<br />
of such action. In<br />
such instances, the<br />
concept of constructive<br />
dismissal is relevant by<br />
way of analogy.<br />
Constructive<br />
dismissal is defined as<br />
quitting or cessation of<br />
work because continued employment<br />
is rendered impossible, unreasonable<br />
or unlikely; when there is a demotion<br />
in rank or a diminution of pay and<br />
other benefits. It exists if an act of<br />
clear discrimination, insensibility, or<br />
disdain by an employer becomes so<br />
unbearable on the part of the employee<br />
that it could foreclose any choice by<br />
him except to forego his continued<br />
employment. The test of constructive<br />
dismissal is whether a reasonable<br />
person in the employee’s position<br />
would have felt compelled to give up<br />
his employment/position under the<br />
circumstances.<br />
Hence, if the “voluntary” separation<br />
or retirement is not necessarily<br />
voluntarily but a by-product of a<br />
maneuvering to force an employee to<br />
leave based on his age, the employer is<br />
not only liable for violation of the Labor<br />
Code, but also of RA 10911.<br />
If found guilty, the erring party may<br />
be punished with a fine ranging from<br />
P50,000 to P500,000, or imprisonment<br />
of three months to two years, or both,<br />
at the discretion of the court. If the<br />
offense is committed by a corporation,<br />
trust, firm, partnership or association<br />
or other entity, the penalty shall be<br />
imposed upon the guilty officer or<br />
officers of such corporation, trust, firm,<br />
partnership or association or entity.<br />
Non-compliant companies may be<br />
reported to the nearest regional or<br />
provincial offices of the Department<br />
of Labor and Employment, where<br />
discriminated employees may be given<br />
assistance in the filing of cases.<br />
A DOSE OF LAW<br />
Dean Nilo Divina<br />
Email: cabdo@divinalaw.com<br />
Published daily by the Daily Tribune Publishing Co., with offices at 3450 Concept Bldg., Florida Street, Makati City • Editorial: (02) 831-0496 • Administration: dailytribune@tribune.net.ph, (02) 833-7085 / (02) 551-5148. To advertise and subscribe: ads@tribune.net.ph, dailytribune@tribune.net.ph, (02) 833-7085 / (02)<br />
551-5148. To submit an opinion article, email opinion@tribune.net.ph. To submit a letter to the editor, email: letters@tribune.net.ph • News: news@tribune.net.ph • Metro: metro@tribune.net.ph • Lifestyle: lifestyle@tribune.net.ph • Business: biz@tribune.net.ph • Sports: sports@tribune.net.ph • PR: pr@tribune.net.ph.