05.03.2020 Views

MARCH 2020 Issue two page spread

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Impeachment follow-up

The issue and what exactly happened

Jhenesis Hines, Val Orozco

staff writers

NEWS

On Dec. 18, 2019, Donald Trump,

the 45th President of the United

States of America, became the third

president to be impeached and the

first president to be impeached

while concurrently running for a

second term. He was charged for

Abuse of Power and Obstruction of

Congress.

“If you are president and you

obstruct justice, try to bribe a foreign

leader and threaten national

security, you’re going to get impeached.

End of story,” U.S. Representative

Susan Davis said during

the House debate.

The term “impeachment” is

the process by which a legislative

body charges against a government

official. Although Trump was

impeached, he will not be removed

from office. There are a number of

significant steps that lead to the

expulsion of a president--which has

never happened before.

The situation started with a

whistleblower who revealed that

Trump threatened to withhold military

aid to Ukraine via phone call on

July 25, 2019--unless Ukraine provided

information about Joe Biden,

one of Trump’s competitors in the

2020 presidential race. The whistleblower

did not take the stand.

“Technically, we will never know

who he is,” AP government teacher

Jim Jiles said.

The call between the President of

Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, and

Trump was disclosed by the White

House last August, and its contents

enabled Speaker of the House Nancy

Pelosi to open the impeachment

inquiry.

After the Democratic-majority

House of Representatives--through

a 230-197 vote--opened the articles,

it went to the Senate for a trial. Because

the Senate is Republican-dominated,

it was assumed beforehand

that Trump would be acquitted, just

as Andrew Johnson (1868) and Bill

Clinton (1998) were before.

The

The second trial to convict or

acquit Trump began in the Senate

on Jan. 22. This trial was overseen

by Chief Justice John Roberts.

The second trial took two weeks,

during which the Senate voted 51-49

not to call witnesses in response to

the Republican concern that witnesses

would slow down the proceedings.

The trial entailed opening

and closing statements; there was

little to no cross-examination.

Republican Mitt Romney from

Utah was the only senator to break

from his party to vote to remove

Trump. All others voted along party

lines.

For Article I: Abuse of Power, 48

senators voted guilty; 52 voted not

guilty.

For Article II: Obstruction of

Justice, 47 senators voted guilty; 53

voted not guilty.

A 67-vote threshold was necessary

for Trump’s removal. The vote

took place Thursday, Feb. 6, and

ultimately, as predicted, Trump was

acquited.

hope (was) that we

wouldn’t use divisive

politics, that we would

stop seeing the opponent

as the enemy.

social studies teacher Jim Jiles

“The hope (was) that we wouldn’t

use divisive politics,” Jiles said, “that

we would stop seeing the opponent

as the enemy. This (divisiveness) has

been going on for decades.”

This divisiveness was seen on

both sides. Trump’s tweets during

the trial claimed that the media

used unreliable sources to slander

and misinform ballots.

“In the end here, nothing happened,”

Trump tweeted the day of

the impeachment. “We don’t approach

anything like the egregious

conduct that should be necessary before

a President should be removed

from office. I believe that a President

can’t be removed from office if there

is no reasonable possibility that the

Senate (won’t vote to remove him).”

However, others disagree, claiming

that the facts were incriminating.

Even if acquittal was inevitable,

Trump should still be held accountable.

“His actions are in defiance of the

vision of our founders—and the oath

of office that he takes—to preserve,

protect and defend the Constitution

of the United States,” Pelosi said

in her remarks on the articles of

impeachment in December.

Some at Northwest agree with

Pelosi.

“I believe that regardless of political

parties, our citizens, Congress

and the rest of the government

should keep the President accountable

for his actions,” civics and economics

teacher Autumn Martin said.

However, many at Northwest

found the impeachment proceedings

to be a waste of time and tax dollars

with its inevitable outcome.

“I believe that it is redundant to

(try to remove) a president when

his term will be over by the end of

this year,” senior Alidaycia Saunders

said.

With the conclusion of the third

presidential impeachment trial in

American history, the final judgment

will be in nine months when

voters cast their ballots for his

reelection.

“The brilliance of America is

that we compromise,” social studies

teacher William Satterfield said.

Drawings by Christy Ma

(From left to right) A phone, president Donald

Trump and a voter box. These are key

images of the impeachment issue where

the solution may lie in dialogue and voting.

March 2020

www.northwesthorizons.com 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!