22.04.2020 Views

Komaba Times Issue 9

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KOMABA WRITERS’ STUDIO

Sexism Towards Victimized Women

The Reality of Restrictions on Women in the Name of Protection

By: Jimin Park

Image credit: Free-Photos [Pixabay]

Sexual violence, such as rape, sexual assault,

and sexual abuse, refers to a sexual act committed

against someone without that person’s

freely-given consent (Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention, 2018). The offenders and victims

could be of any gender, but in many cases, men

are the offenders and women are the victims.

About 35 percent of women worldwide have experienced

sexual violence and about 120 million

girls worldwide have experienced forced sexual

acts (UN Women, 2017). However, patriarchal societies

restrict women to behave in certain ways

in order to prevent sexual violence, rather than

trying to eradicate the actual cause; the offenders.

For example, there are claims that women

should not wear short dresses and walk around

late at night because they might be targeted for

sex crimes.

This argument may seem plausible because it

seems as if it is trying to protect possible victims

of sexual violence; however, such a perspective

may lead to shaming on women when they are

victimized, as if they are the ones responsible for

the crime. This paper focuses on how perspectives

which claim that women should be more

careful and take responsibility for oneself are

actually oppressing rather than protecting them.

Firstly, the paper examines the conservative

view towards victimized women and how it still

has its influence until today. Secondly, the paper

analyses the factors of being the victim of sexual

violence and whether victims should really deal

with responsibility. Lastly, this essay states the

nature of sexual violence and victim-blaming and

the real prevention of them. Certain restrictions

on women in the name of preventing sexual violence

is a way to oppress women’s freedom and

rights because such restrictions are based on

the premise that victimized women are the cause

of the violence, not the offenders themselves.

Conservative views on victimized

women

In patriarchal societies, there have been discriminatory

perspectives towards women, as if they

were inferior to men. Especially, the society’s

view towards victimized women in sexual violence

was even crueler. For example, in the US,

during the British colonial era, the rape of a virgin

was considered a crime against her father, rather

than a crime against the victim herself. Also,

when a sex crime occurred, women had to be

dependent on the courts and community, which

consisted of men. Therefore a woman had to

comply with male standards for her behavior by

proving non-consent through verbal and physical

resistance. If she could not prove non-consent,

she was punished for assault. In the 19th century,

women were praised for their purity, therefore

a woman who got involved in sexual intercourse

even against her will was considered to be a

“fallen” woman and was blamed for the man’s

crime and socially criticized as a result of the

attack. In the 20th century, the psychological

approach to sexual crime started, but most theories

concluded that the offenders were mentally

ill, therefore reducing the offender’s responsibility

for his actions since he was considered uncontrollable.

In addition, society’s perception of the

victim also changed. Also, female nature became

sexualized, therefore female victims were viewed

as if they contributed to their own victimization

(Donat & D’Emilio, 1992). By examining the example

of the United States, it is clear that women’s

choices and decisions about their lives and

bodies were highly restricted, and their dignity

was ignored.

Even though gender equality is now considered

as justice and women’s rights have improved

compared to past centuries, sexism towards

women still exist which leads to victim-blaming,

especially when the victim is a woman. For

example, Judge Lindsey Kushner QC has been

criticized for commenting that women need to

protect themselves against the threat of being

involved in sexual assault while drunk. The campaign

group ‘End Violence Against Women’ condemned

that such comments blame the victims

for rape and remove responsibility from the male

offender (Rawlinson, 2017). The contributions of

social stereotypes and negativities on victimized

women lead to victim-blaming and to rape itself.

Addressing problems of victim-blaming would be

more effective than worrying about what women

wear or how they drink until the morning.

Is it really the victim’s fault?

Because of such negative perspectives, myths

on sexual violence exist, such as “most sexual

violence are committed by strangers,” and

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!