08.07.2020 Views

daimler-ir-interimreport-q1-2020

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C | INTERIM MANAGEMENT REPORT 23

tions or findings, even if such determinations or findings are

not within the scope of such authority’s responsibility or jurisdiction.

Thus, a negative determination or finding in one proceeding,

such as the fine notice issued by the Stuttgart district

attorney’s office, carries the risk of being able to have an

adverse effect on other proceedings, also potentially leading

to new or expanded investigations or proceedings, including

lawsuits.

In addition, Daimler’s ability to defend itself in proceedings

could be impaired by the fine notice issued by the Stuttgart

district attorney’s office as well as other unfavorable findings,

results or developments in any of the information requests,

inquiries, investigations, administrative orders, legal actions

and/or proceedings discussed above.

Risks from legal proceedings in connection with diesel exhaust

gas emissions – court proceedings

A consumer class-action lawsuit is pending in the United

States in which it is alleged that Daimler AG and MBUSA conspired

with Robert Bosch LLC and Robert Bosch GmbH (collectively,

“Bosch”) to deceive US regulators and consumers. A

separate lawsuit was filed in January 2019 by the State of Arizona

alleging that Daimler AG and MBUSA deliberately

deceived consumers in connection with the advertising of

Mercedes-Benz diesel vehicles. Consumer class-action lawsuits

containing similar allegations were filed against Daimler

AG and other companies of the Group in Canada in April 2016,

and against Daimler AG in Israel in February 2019. A similar

class action was filed in the United States in July 2017, but

in December 2017, the parties stipulated to dismiss that lawsuit

without prejudice. It may be filed again under specific

conditions.

Furthermore, class actions have been filed in the United States

and Canada alleging anticompetitive behavior relating to vehicle

technology, costs, suppliers, markets, and other competitive

attributes, including diesel emissions control technology.

A securities class action lawsuit is pending in the United States

on behalf of investors in Daimler AG American Depositary

Receipts which alleges that the defendants made materially

false and misleading statements about diesel emissions in

Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Daimler AG and the respective other

affected companies of the Group regard these lawsuits as

being without merit and will defend against the claims.

In Germany, a multitude of lawsuits by customers alleging

claims under warranty and/or tort laws as well as lawsuits by

investors alleging the violation of disclosure requirements are

pending. In this context, motions to initiate a model proceeding

in accordance with the Act on Model Proceedings in Capital

Markets Disputes (KapMuG) have been filed by investors as

well as by Daimler AG. Currently, no model proceeding is pending.

Daimler AG also regards these lawsuits as being without

merit and will defend against the claims.

If court proceedings have an unfavorable outcome for Daimler,

this could result in significant damages and punitive damages

payments, remedial works or other cost-intensive measures.

Court proceedings can in part also have an adverse effect on

the reputation of the Group.

Furthermore, Daimler’s ability to defend itself in the court proceedings

could be impaired by unfavorable findings, results or

developments in any of the governmental or other court proceedings

discussed above, in particular the fine notice issued

by the Stuttgart district attorney’s office.

Risks from other legal proceedings

Following the settlement decision by the European Commission

adopted on July 19, 2016 concluding the trucks antitrust

proceedings, Daimler AG and Daimler Truck AG are facing customers’

claims for damages to a considerable degree. Respective

legal actions, class actions and other forms of legal

redress have been initiated in various states in and outside of

Europe and should further be expected. Daimler takes appropriate

legal remedies to defend itself.

As legal proceedings are fraught with a large degree of uncertainty,

it is possible that after their final resolution, some of the

provisions we have recognized for them could prove to be

insufficient. As a result, substantial additional expenditures

may arise. This also applies to legal proceedings for which the

Group has seen no requirement to recognize a provision.

It cannot be ruled out that the regulatory risks and risks from

legal proceedings discussed above individually or in the aggregate

may materially adversely impact our profitability and

financial position.

Although the final result of any such litigation may influence

the Group’s earnings and cash flows in any particular period,

Daimler believes that any resulting obligations are unlikely to

have a sustained effect on the Group’s financial position.

Further information on legal proceedings is provided in

E Note 30 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

of the Annual Report 2019.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!