daimler-ir-interimreport-q1-2020
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
C | INTERIM MANAGEMENT REPORT 23
tions or findings, even if such determinations or findings are
not within the scope of such authority’s responsibility or jurisdiction.
Thus, a negative determination or finding in one proceeding,
such as the fine notice issued by the Stuttgart district
attorney’s office, carries the risk of being able to have an
adverse effect on other proceedings, also potentially leading
to new or expanded investigations or proceedings, including
lawsuits.
In addition, Daimler’s ability to defend itself in proceedings
could be impaired by the fine notice issued by the Stuttgart
district attorney’s office as well as other unfavorable findings,
results or developments in any of the information requests,
inquiries, investigations, administrative orders, legal actions
and/or proceedings discussed above.
Risks from legal proceedings in connection with diesel exhaust
gas emissions – court proceedings
A consumer class-action lawsuit is pending in the United
States in which it is alleged that Daimler AG and MBUSA conspired
with Robert Bosch LLC and Robert Bosch GmbH (collectively,
“Bosch”) to deceive US regulators and consumers. A
separate lawsuit was filed in January 2019 by the State of Arizona
alleging that Daimler AG and MBUSA deliberately
deceived consumers in connection with the advertising of
Mercedes-Benz diesel vehicles. Consumer class-action lawsuits
containing similar allegations were filed against Daimler
AG and other companies of the Group in Canada in April 2016,
and against Daimler AG in Israel in February 2019. A similar
class action was filed in the United States in July 2017, but
in December 2017, the parties stipulated to dismiss that lawsuit
without prejudice. It may be filed again under specific
conditions.
Furthermore, class actions have been filed in the United States
and Canada alleging anticompetitive behavior relating to vehicle
technology, costs, suppliers, markets, and other competitive
attributes, including diesel emissions control technology.
A securities class action lawsuit is pending in the United States
on behalf of investors in Daimler AG American Depositary
Receipts which alleges that the defendants made materially
false and misleading statements about diesel emissions in
Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Daimler AG and the respective other
affected companies of the Group regard these lawsuits as
being without merit and will defend against the claims.
In Germany, a multitude of lawsuits by customers alleging
claims under warranty and/or tort laws as well as lawsuits by
investors alleging the violation of disclosure requirements are
pending. In this context, motions to initiate a model proceeding
in accordance with the Act on Model Proceedings in Capital
Markets Disputes (KapMuG) have been filed by investors as
well as by Daimler AG. Currently, no model proceeding is pending.
Daimler AG also regards these lawsuits as being without
merit and will defend against the claims.
If court proceedings have an unfavorable outcome for Daimler,
this could result in significant damages and punitive damages
payments, remedial works or other cost-intensive measures.
Court proceedings can in part also have an adverse effect on
the reputation of the Group.
Furthermore, Daimler’s ability to defend itself in the court proceedings
could be impaired by unfavorable findings, results or
developments in any of the governmental or other court proceedings
discussed above, in particular the fine notice issued
by the Stuttgart district attorney’s office.
Risks from other legal proceedings
Following the settlement decision by the European Commission
adopted on July 19, 2016 concluding the trucks antitrust
proceedings, Daimler AG and Daimler Truck AG are facing customers’
claims for damages to a considerable degree. Respective
legal actions, class actions and other forms of legal
redress have been initiated in various states in and outside of
Europe and should further be expected. Daimler takes appropriate
legal remedies to defend itself.
As legal proceedings are fraught with a large degree of uncertainty,
it is possible that after their final resolution, some of the
provisions we have recognized for them could prove to be
insufficient. As a result, substantial additional expenditures
may arise. This also applies to legal proceedings for which the
Group has seen no requirement to recognize a provision.
It cannot be ruled out that the regulatory risks and risks from
legal proceedings discussed above individually or in the aggregate
may materially adversely impact our profitability and
financial position.
Although the final result of any such litigation may influence
the Group’s earnings and cash flows in any particular period,
Daimler believes that any resulting obligations are unlikely to
have a sustained effect on the Group’s financial position.
Further information on legal proceedings is provided in
E Note 30 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
of the Annual Report 2019.