What are Weak, Good and Very Good as rated by Supervisors or Reviewers while reviewing your proposal - Tutors India

Therefore, reviewers should carefully think
about the guidance on the rating mentioned
below to progress the consistency of the
scores as well as the skill of communicating
the methodical impact of the proposals that
have been reviewed.
IV. STAGES OF REVIEWS
Two-stage document review is conducted in
the review method by all reviewers. Here,
the research proposals are reviewed by the
same reviewer over two stages by document
review instead of using the panel review
method. In the first stage of the review
process, an overall rating is allotted to every
research proposal in four grades based on
qualified assessment. Additionally, to unveil
the results from the first stage of the review
process to those who were not approved and
wish to unveil, they will further make an
absolute assessment on individual rating
scores in relation to the research contents,
etc. In the absolute assessment done for each
rating factor, if 2 are assigned which means
somewhat insufficient or 1 is assigned which
means insufficient, then they will make a
decision on why it was reviewed as
somewhat insufficient or insufficient for
either point of the rating factor. In the
second stage of the review method, the same
reviewer who reviewed the first stage will
assign a new score on the relevant research
proposal based on the result of the derived
from the first stage review process. At that
time, verify the comments provided by the
reviewers in the first stage, etc., and of all
the reviewers who are assessing the same
research proposal, and then allot a score
based on their own insight. The approval of
research proposals and the provision of
expenses for research will be decided based
on that allotted score.
V. IMPACT IS A FUNCTION OF
SIGNIFICANCE AND LIKELIHOOD
The overall impact score in the peer review
method is based on the primary outcome,
reflecting the judgment of the reviewers on
two broad concepts: significance and
likelihood.
1. Significance – The importance and
novelty of the research problem, its
capability to move forward the limit of
knowledge.
2. Likelihood- the ability of each individual
as a principal investigator has the ability to
achieve their ends, as assessed by their
experimental design, the proficiency of their
team, and the resources at the clearance to
execute the research. Significance and
likelihood together form impact. It also
helps to bear in mind about these
relationships using this simple rule: Impact
= Function (significance, likelihood).
Each member of the review panel will be
necessary to provide the strengths and
weaknesses in written form with reference to
the assessment criterion. The strengths and
weaknesses will form as a foundation for
assigning a numerical value to the
applications. The strength of the proposal is
its feature that when compared to the
Copyright © 2020 TutorsIndia. All rights reserved 2