By-laws - Queensland Law Society
By-laws - Queensland Law Society
By-laws - Queensland Law Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Communication<br />
Part 2 – The finer points of drafting<br />
T he<br />
pro cess of com pos ing a well struc -<br />
tured and ef fec tive doc u ment in volves a<br />
num ber of cru cial steps. The first edi tion<br />
in this se ries (printed in the Feb ru ary Ver dict)<br />
looked at writ ing doc u ments us ing plain and<br />
clear lan guage. This in stall ment will cover the<br />
es sen tials of draft ing as they ap ply to writ ing<br />
vir tu ally any type of pa per.<br />
The impor tance of effec tive draft ing cannot be<br />
under stated. Draft ing enables the writer to struc ture<br />
arguments, empha sise impor tant points and essen -<br />
tially optimize the “flow” of the document. In addition<br />
to this, draft ing lets the author analyse and restruc -<br />
ture (where neces sary) sentences and paragraphs to<br />
ensure correct grammar and word usage. While there<br />
are many facets of draft ing, this paper will analyse<br />
those most crucial to the writing process.<br />
communication breakdown<br />
break down<br />
Length<br />
The length of a document is very impor tant. A short,<br />
precise document will more readily convey your<br />
message, so where possi ble, try to be succinct. It has<br />
been stated that:<br />
“Many legal documents are unnec es sar ily lengthy,<br />
overwrit ten, self conscious and repeti tious. They<br />
consist of lengthy sentences and involved sentence<br />
construc tion. They are poorly struc tured and poorly<br />
designed. They suffer from elabo rate and often<br />
unnec es sary cross-refer enc ing. They retain archaic<br />
phrases. They use techni cal terms and foreign words<br />
and phrases even when English equiv a lents are<br />
readily avail able. They are unintel li gi ble to the<br />
ordinary reader and barely intel li gi ble to many<br />
lawyers”. 1<br />
To this end, it is clear that the wording of a<br />
document must be pitched at a level appro pri ate to<br />
Vol. 2 2006 The Verdict 55