07.12.2020 Views

Lesson-7-scouting-and-patrolling

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scouting is done by small numbers of troops (typically two members of a rifle squad) and is

generally limited to the immediate front of the sending unit. Scouts may move down a road to

look for enemy activity, or move to a higher observation point to observe. Sometimes they simply

form a point element ahead of the lead unit in a column. But they are there to discover and report

on the enemy within a limited area; if they get into a fight their mission is compromised.

Patrols are detachments from a unit, task organized for a longer mission (longer duration and

probably a longer distance from the home unit). They may be reconnaissance patrols, which are

like scouts but usually larger in number, or they might be combat patrols, organized and directed

to achieve a specific outcome: a raid on an enemy position that requires stealth and a high degree

of coordination with the application of limited force; an ambush to disrupt enemy movements.

Scouting is generally done by application of standing unit SOPs and skills mastered in training

and combat. Patrols are often intricately planned and unique to a specific task.

We will examine scouting first.

Scouting

Going into WWII, the US Army’s rifle squad had two designated scouts. These were to be

riflemen expressly trained in “sneak and peek” reconnoitering techniques. This soon changed.

The first problem was that the designated scouts were as a

practical matter more likely to be exposed to enemy detection

and fire; they moved frequently, operated to the front, and were

obliged to expose themselves more often than the other squad

members. I suspect designated scouts soon resented this unequal

exposure to danger; but resent it or not, scouts will on the

average be more exposed to danger than the other squad mates,

and would take casualties. Soon enough, the designated scouts

were gone, and had to be replaced with other riflemen or new

replacements. (It is a sad fact, to which the writer can attest

from bitter experience, that a common practice in poorly-led units involves using “fresh meat”—

new replacements—as sniper bait. This is extremely bad practice.)

In any case, the prewar system was soon abandoned and all the squad’s riflemen (not the

BAR team) were expected to function as scouts, and trained to do so.

A catch: as the Manual sagely informs us:

Although all soldiers should be able to act as scouts, some are better suited than others for this

work. Men selected to be scouts should be reliable, persevering, intelligent, patient, and should be

able to read and write clearly. They should be physically and mentally hard, have unimpaired vision

and hearing, and be able to swim. Scouts must be resourceful and possess courage and initiative.

They must be good shots and good close-in fighters. Men with hay fever, night blindness and impaired

sense of smell should not be given duty as scouts, for they will betray their own and others'

presence. [FM 21-75, 1944: para 3]

Translation: “any soldier can function as a scout, but some live longer doing it than others.”

Folklore suggests that Americans are bred to be eagle-eyed, skilled trackers and scouts. In practice,

they are as good as they can be trained to be, subject to personal potential. It’s a good idea

to have every rifleman trained as a scout, but if one or two are klutzes in the field they should not

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!