23.12.2012 Views

The 'Vision Thing' Behaviors Three Key Leaders ... - John Renesch

The 'Vision Thing' Behaviors Three Key Leaders ... - John Renesch

The 'Vision Thing' Behaviors Three Key Leaders ... - John Renesch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ETHICS CRITICISM burst was more about her own frustra- LEADERSHIP FAILURE<br />

tion than about helping <strong>John</strong> get back<br />

Ethical Criticism<br />

on track. It’s understandable to be frustrated<br />

when people aren’t doing their What You Can Learn<br />

Great leaders bring out the best.<br />

best work, but ethically intelligent criticism<br />

is given with an eye toward<br />

improving the other person, for that<br />

from government leadership failure.<br />

by Bruce Weinstein<br />

person’s sake and for the sake of others.<br />

by Becky Shambaugh<br />

IT WAS THE WEEKLY TEAM<br />

meeting, no different<br />

EEtthhiiccaallllyy IInntteelllliiggeenntt CCrriittiicciissmm<br />

Here are four ways to give ethically<br />

intelligent criticism:<br />

RECENT EVENTS IN WASHington<br />

have illumi-<br />

from others. My friend 1. Find the right setting. Cheryl was<br />

nated the stunning failure<br />

<strong>John</strong>, his boss Cheryl, and his assistant right to criticize <strong>John</strong>, but she shouldn’t of our leadership. I’ve never before seen<br />

Minsun, were planning their work for have done so in front of <strong>John</strong>’s assistant. from various factions of government<br />

the week. <strong>John</strong> made a casual remark 2. Start with something positive or such a lack of collaboration and willing-<br />

about the prestigious grant he’d been praiseworthy that the person has done ness to work together for the greater good of<br />

awarded, when Cheryl exploded. recently. Cheryl might say that she was the country. Yet I choose to look for the<br />

“All I’ve heard about for weeks is glad <strong>John</strong> had gotten the grant he had silver lining—something we can learn.<br />

your grant!” she blurted. <strong>John</strong> had worked so long and hard to earn. Most firms have processes in place<br />

never seen his boss show anger, and Starting with praise is good from both to encourage people to work together,<br />

the two had worked together for years. an ethical and a psychological point of yet they still struggle with collaboration<br />

Cheryl stopped yelling, and <strong>John</strong> view. Ethically, it gives to others their between leadership levels, departments,<br />

became quiet. Her anger had simmer- due. Psychologically, it makes them genders, generations, and cultures. A<br />

ed for weeks, and it erupted violently. receptive to what you’re about to say. culture of collaboration starts at the top.<br />

<strong>John</strong> confessed to me that he had talk- 3. Focus on the behavior, not the per- How well leaders work together sets<br />

ed much about the project for which son. If you’re troubled by a team mem- the tone for how others work together.<br />

he’d been given funds. It was valuber’s work ethic—coming to work late, If the vice presidents of sales and cusable<br />

to his career, and he had worked leaving early, spending too much time tomer service won’t collaborate for the<br />

hard to get it. He also admitted that surfing the Internet—calling him or her good of the customer, don’t expect<br />

although the organization had given lazy or selfish diminishes that person. It’s their teams to work together either.<br />

him some time each week to<br />

also probably untrue; he/she One big factor in collaboration is that<br />

work on the project, he was<br />

has likely done good work in too many leaders are trapped in 20th-<br />

spending too much time on it.<br />

the past, and outside of work, century leadership models that simply<br />

Cheryl was right; <strong>John</strong> had<br />

may be full of energy. Instead don’t work today. Our world is becom-<br />

his priorities in the wrong<br />

of saying, “You’re a goof-off,” ing more complex and interconnected.<br />

order; nevertheless, Cheryl<br />

you could say, “You’ve been We can’t use the thinking and decision-<br />

could have presented her crit-<br />

coming to work late often, making processes to navigate the global<br />

icism more respectfully. <strong>John</strong><br />

and when you’re here, you’re terrain that we used just 10 years ago.<br />

was embarrassed to be<br />

not spending enough time on It will take a fully engaged, collabora-<br />

dressed down in front of his<br />

the projects you have to do.” tive and cross-functional group work-<br />

assistant. Surely, Minsun did not have <strong>The</strong> first is an insult; the second a valid ing toward a common cause to deal<br />

to be in on the bloodletting.<br />

complaint about a behavior.<br />

with tough, complex problems. If lead-<br />

Cheryl did prompt <strong>John</strong> to rethink 4. End on an inspiring note. If this is ers don’t put away their political agen-<br />

his priorities, but her style of criticism a first offense and it’s not egregious, das and egos, it will catch up with them.<br />

wasn’t consistent with ethical intelligence don’t give an ultimatum or threat. I once worked with a Fortune 150<br />

—the art of doing the right thing and Instead of saying, “You’d better get your organization that had exceptional<br />

treating people the right way. It wasn’t act together, or else,” give your vote of growth for 20 years. But things started<br />

compatible with leadership excellence. confidence. People rise—or sink—to to go awry, and they lost key contracts<br />

What should be the goal of criticism? levels expected of them. EILs seek not and market share. <strong>The</strong> leaders called us<br />

You might achieve several goals: Help to frighten but to inspire.<br />

to assess the situation. We discovered<br />

people get back on track; make them If you find yourself in Cheryl’s posi- that their leadership was the problem. First,<br />

feel bad for what they did or didn’t do; tion, speak privately to the trouble- they lacked clarity about objectives.<br />

remind them of your power/authorisome employee, praise that person’s Second, departments were not working<br />

ty; inspire/motivate them to do better contributions, mention specific con- together—the silo mentality and blame<br />

work; display how clever, smart, or cerns, and affirm your belief in him or game were rampant. <strong>The</strong> lack of collab-<br />

perturbed you are; or blow off steam. her. <strong>The</strong> employee will likely make oration between functions created a<br />

Flaunting your power doesn’t improve changes for the better, and you will ripple effect that reached to customers.<br />

the situation. Being nasty or instilling have achieved the ultimate goal of With a targeted leadership development<br />

fear is disrespectful and hurtful. excellent leadership.<br />

approach, we worked with the leaders<br />

Ethically intelligent criticism seeks People will pleasantly surprise you to get the organization back on track.<br />

to bring out the best in others. When if you only give them the chance. LE You can move beyond organizational<br />

you have power over someone else,<br />

you ought to use that power imbalance<br />

constructively and seek to make<br />

Bruce Weinstein, Ph.D., is a speaker and author of Ethical<br />

Intelligence (New World Library), and host of “Ask the Ethics<br />

Guy!” Visit http://theethicsguy.com.<br />

politics, find common ground, and work<br />

toward common goals using five ideas:<br />

• Take time to build relationships and<br />

things better, not worse. Cheryl’s out- ACTION: Be an ethically intelligent critic. build the team. We saw this strategy<br />

14 November 2011 www.LeaderExcel.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!