The 'Vision Thing' Behaviors Three Key Leaders ... - John Renesch
The 'Vision Thing' Behaviors Three Key Leaders ... - John Renesch
The 'Vision Thing' Behaviors Three Key Leaders ... - John Renesch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ETHICS CRITICISM burst was more about her own frustra- LEADERSHIP FAILURE<br />
tion than about helping <strong>John</strong> get back<br />
Ethical Criticism<br />
on track. It’s understandable to be frustrated<br />
when people aren’t doing their What You Can Learn<br />
Great leaders bring out the best.<br />
best work, but ethically intelligent criticism<br />
is given with an eye toward<br />
improving the other person, for that<br />
from government leadership failure.<br />
by Bruce Weinstein<br />
person’s sake and for the sake of others.<br />
by Becky Shambaugh<br />
IT WAS THE WEEKLY TEAM<br />
meeting, no different<br />
EEtthhiiccaallllyy IInntteelllliiggeenntt CCrriittiicciissmm<br />
Here are four ways to give ethically<br />
intelligent criticism:<br />
RECENT EVENTS IN WASHington<br />
have illumi-<br />
from others. My friend 1. Find the right setting. Cheryl was<br />
nated the stunning failure<br />
<strong>John</strong>, his boss Cheryl, and his assistant right to criticize <strong>John</strong>, but she shouldn’t of our leadership. I’ve never before seen<br />
Minsun, were planning their work for have done so in front of <strong>John</strong>’s assistant. from various factions of government<br />
the week. <strong>John</strong> made a casual remark 2. Start with something positive or such a lack of collaboration and willing-<br />
about the prestigious grant he’d been praiseworthy that the person has done ness to work together for the greater good of<br />
awarded, when Cheryl exploded. recently. Cheryl might say that she was the country. Yet I choose to look for the<br />
“All I’ve heard about for weeks is glad <strong>John</strong> had gotten the grant he had silver lining—something we can learn.<br />
your grant!” she blurted. <strong>John</strong> had worked so long and hard to earn. Most firms have processes in place<br />
never seen his boss show anger, and Starting with praise is good from both to encourage people to work together,<br />
the two had worked together for years. an ethical and a psychological point of yet they still struggle with collaboration<br />
Cheryl stopped yelling, and <strong>John</strong> view. Ethically, it gives to others their between leadership levels, departments,<br />
became quiet. Her anger had simmer- due. Psychologically, it makes them genders, generations, and cultures. A<br />
ed for weeks, and it erupted violently. receptive to what you’re about to say. culture of collaboration starts at the top.<br />
<strong>John</strong> confessed to me that he had talk- 3. Focus on the behavior, not the per- How well leaders work together sets<br />
ed much about the project for which son. If you’re troubled by a team mem- the tone for how others work together.<br />
he’d been given funds. It was valuber’s work ethic—coming to work late, If the vice presidents of sales and cusable<br />
to his career, and he had worked leaving early, spending too much time tomer service won’t collaborate for the<br />
hard to get it. He also admitted that surfing the Internet—calling him or her good of the customer, don’t expect<br />
although the organization had given lazy or selfish diminishes that person. It’s their teams to work together either.<br />
him some time each week to<br />
also probably untrue; he/she One big factor in collaboration is that<br />
work on the project, he was<br />
has likely done good work in too many leaders are trapped in 20th-<br />
spending too much time on it.<br />
the past, and outside of work, century leadership models that simply<br />
Cheryl was right; <strong>John</strong> had<br />
may be full of energy. Instead don’t work today. Our world is becom-<br />
his priorities in the wrong<br />
of saying, “You’re a goof-off,” ing more complex and interconnected.<br />
order; nevertheless, Cheryl<br />
you could say, “You’ve been We can’t use the thinking and decision-<br />
could have presented her crit-<br />
coming to work late often, making processes to navigate the global<br />
icism more respectfully. <strong>John</strong><br />
and when you’re here, you’re terrain that we used just 10 years ago.<br />
was embarrassed to be<br />
not spending enough time on It will take a fully engaged, collabora-<br />
dressed down in front of his<br />
the projects you have to do.” tive and cross-functional group work-<br />
assistant. Surely, Minsun did not have <strong>The</strong> first is an insult; the second a valid ing toward a common cause to deal<br />
to be in on the bloodletting.<br />
complaint about a behavior.<br />
with tough, complex problems. If lead-<br />
Cheryl did prompt <strong>John</strong> to rethink 4. End on an inspiring note. If this is ers don’t put away their political agen-<br />
his priorities, but her style of criticism a first offense and it’s not egregious, das and egos, it will catch up with them.<br />
wasn’t consistent with ethical intelligence don’t give an ultimatum or threat. I once worked with a Fortune 150<br />
—the art of doing the right thing and Instead of saying, “You’d better get your organization that had exceptional<br />
treating people the right way. It wasn’t act together, or else,” give your vote of growth for 20 years. But things started<br />
compatible with leadership excellence. confidence. People rise—or sink—to to go awry, and they lost key contracts<br />
What should be the goal of criticism? levels expected of them. EILs seek not and market share. <strong>The</strong> leaders called us<br />
You might achieve several goals: Help to frighten but to inspire.<br />
to assess the situation. We discovered<br />
people get back on track; make them If you find yourself in Cheryl’s posi- that their leadership was the problem. First,<br />
feel bad for what they did or didn’t do; tion, speak privately to the trouble- they lacked clarity about objectives.<br />
remind them of your power/authorisome employee, praise that person’s Second, departments were not working<br />
ty; inspire/motivate them to do better contributions, mention specific con- together—the silo mentality and blame<br />
work; display how clever, smart, or cerns, and affirm your belief in him or game were rampant. <strong>The</strong> lack of collab-<br />
perturbed you are; or blow off steam. her. <strong>The</strong> employee will likely make oration between functions created a<br />
Flaunting your power doesn’t improve changes for the better, and you will ripple effect that reached to customers.<br />
the situation. Being nasty or instilling have achieved the ultimate goal of With a targeted leadership development<br />
fear is disrespectful and hurtful. excellent leadership.<br />
approach, we worked with the leaders<br />
Ethically intelligent criticism seeks People will pleasantly surprise you to get the organization back on track.<br />
to bring out the best in others. When if you only give them the chance. LE You can move beyond organizational<br />
you have power over someone else,<br />
you ought to use that power imbalance<br />
constructively and seek to make<br />
Bruce Weinstein, Ph.D., is a speaker and author of Ethical<br />
Intelligence (New World Library), and host of “Ask the Ethics<br />
Guy!” Visit http://theethicsguy.com.<br />
politics, find common ground, and work<br />
toward common goals using five ideas:<br />
• Take time to build relationships and<br />
things better, not worse. Cheryl’s out- ACTION: Be an ethically intelligent critic. build the team. We saw this strategy<br />
14 November 2011 www.LeaderExcel.com