ENGAGE-TB: Operational Guidance - World Health Organization
ENGAGE-TB: Operational Guidance - World Health Organization
ENGAGE-TB: Operational Guidance - World Health Organization
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>ENGAGE</strong>-<strong>TB</strong>: Integrating community-based tuberculosis activities<br />
Points for consideration:<br />
• Joint consultation between NGOs, other CSOs and NTPs or equivalents is recommended when assessing<br />
and determining the tasks for implementation.<br />
• The plans should address the gaps identified in the situational analysis and include the tasks identified.<br />
• Specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound objectives should be defined for the main<br />
tasks identified.<br />
• <strong>TB</strong> patients and their communities should be involved in developing and implementing the plan.<br />
• The planned activities must be aligned with national policies and guidelines. <strong>TB</strong> forms and registers<br />
should be standardized and linked to the national <strong>TB</strong> monitoring and evaluation system to ensure that the<br />
contribution of community-based <strong>TB</strong> activities to national <strong>TB</strong> prevention and care is recorded.<br />
8.5 Monitoring and evaluation<br />
Regular monitoring and evaluation will help in assessing the quality, effectiveness, coverage and delivery<br />
of community-based <strong>TB</strong> activities and the engagement of NGOs and other CSOs. It promotes a learning<br />
culture and serves as a foundation to ensure continuous improvement of programme implementation.<br />
NTPs or their equivalents should ensure that there is a single national monitoring and evaluation system that<br />
recognizes the contribution and engagement of NGOs and other CSOs. Electronic systems and modern<br />
technologies should be tested, standardized and used to improve monitoring and evaluation.<br />
Examples of areas for learning and follow-up<br />
• choice of target groups and ability to reach these<br />
• appropriateness of initial targets set and need for revision<br />
• bottlenecks in referrals, case notification, treatment, care and support<br />
• difficulties faced by patients and their communities in securing good-quality services<br />
• difficulties in the arrangements between the NGO or other CSO and the NTP or equivalent<br />
• scaling-up of best practices<br />
Quarterly reviews of progress would help to uncover issues in implementation and enable mid-stream<br />
correction to plans and budgets and to overall strategy. The NTP should help to smooth any operational<br />
difficulties that NGOs and other CSOs may face and cannot independently resolve. Quarterly meetings to<br />
discuss the review findings could be held at subnational or local levels so that there is cross-fertilization of<br />
learning between NGOs and other CSOs and with the NTP. Annual meetings at the national level should be<br />
organized by the NCB and a broad spectrum of implementing NGOs and other CSOs invited to share their<br />
findings and report progress. The resulting national report issued by the NTP should be shared widely with<br />
all stakeholders within government, NGOs and other CSOs, patients and community members, donors<br />
and the general public.<br />
Evaluation of the results of initial implementation of the action plan is important to guide replication and<br />
scaling-up of activities. Evaluation should be an ongoing process and include evaluation of both the activities<br />
(process evaluation) and achievement of the objectives (impact evaluation) of the action plan. Qualitative<br />
methods and periodic surveys could be used to provide an understanding of how well NGOs and other<br />
CSOs are supported and how they have engaged in community-based <strong>TB</strong> activities (see annexes 1 and 2).<br />
11