Cyber Defense eMagazine June 2021 Edition

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Prioritizing Disinformation Campaigns’ Role in Cyber Warfare By Dan Brahmy, CEO of Cyabra With reports of cyberattacks and hacks like that of the Colonial Pipeline and SolarWinds increasing in frequency, it can be easy to forget another aspect of cyber warfare: disinformation attacks and influence campaigns. From public health crises to elections to the significance the term “fake news” has taken in American households, this type of cyber warfare poses an increasingly formidable threat to defense leaders. While the U.S. has been doing an adequate job of combatting individual attacks in the eyes of the public as they arise, defense agencies need to begin prioritizing comprehensive, thorough programs to proactively stop influence campaigns in their tracks. Cyber Defense eMagazine – June 2021 Edition 112 Copyright © 2021, Cyber Defense Magazine. All rights reserved worldwide.
Undermining Public Trust The cycle of hacks and leaks before prominent elections is almost commonplace. With French President Emmanuel Macron’s email leaks ahead of his 2017 election to the pivotal email leaks of then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton via Wikileaks, it’s becoming less of a surprise when these leaks drop. And while it might be easier for the public to turn their eyes to these concrete examples of influence campaigns rooted in breaches, it is important not to overlook or discredit the ongoing presence of disinformation based influence campaigns. For example, in early May the Washington Post reported that former President Trump’s lawyer, Rudy. Giuliani was the target of a Russian influence campaign ahead of the 2020 election. And with no tangible hack or information dump for the public to latch onto, it can become increasingly difficult for citizens to discern exactly how and when they are being influenced by the effects of these types of campaigns, especially when this “news” is being amplified by fake accounts. Further, if the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol is indicative of public trust in elections, it’s easy to see the lasting and significant effects disinformation campaigns can have on governmental systems; and that is not even taking into account the disinformation spread by conspiracy groups and others around the attack itself. Though it is tempting to write off these attacks as one off responses to election cycles, disinformation campaigns throughout the pandemic have proved these types of attacks are anything but singular events. Both China and Russia launched disinformation campaigns to discredit trust in Western vaccines. Over the past few years, we’ve seen continued efforts on the part of Chinese diplomats to increase and amplify their social media presence, despite the state’s ban on those platforms. Beyond the posts, Twitter has identified a multitude of fake accounts retweeting and engaging with their posts, serving to not only amplify their messaging, but also create an appearance of groundswell support. Though Twitter already has and will continue to ban fake accounts as they are detected, it hasn’t succeeded in stopping bot accounts in support of the Chinese government. As the Associated Press reports, as alleged support and engagement with the original Tweets continues, there is an increased risk these propaganda posts can distort Twitter’s algorithm that boosts popular posts. Yet China’s manipulation of U.S. politics and sentiment via social media is nothing new. Typical internet denizens need to look no further than the uproar sparked by a tweet in support of Hong Kong protests by then-Houston Rockets general manager, Daryl Morey. The Wall Street Journal in partnership with researchers at Clemson University determined that following his tweet, Morey was the target of a coordinated harassment campaign. The amplification around supposed internet users’ responses served to sway American conversations around Hong Kong and China, both in political discussions, but also in matters related to the U.S. companies’ financial interests. The effects of disinformation campaigns continue to seep into the everyday life of the average internet user, resulting in gradual yet drastic effects in the country’s perception of politics, international affairs, finance and the like. The United States needs to start prioritizing these types of attacks when approaching Cyber Defense eMagazine – June 2021 Edition 113 Copyright © 2021, Cyber Defense Magazine. All rights reserved worldwide.
Page 1 and 2:
Key Business Lessons Learned from T
Page 3 and 4:
Clean Water Shows Us Why Cyber Cert
Page 5 and 6:
@CYBERDEFENSEMAG CYBER DEFENSE eMAG
Page 7 and 8:
Cyber Defense eMagazine - June 2021
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Exploiting Vulnerabilities Back in
Page 35 and 36:
Data Loss Prevention in Turbulent T
Page 37 and 38:
● ● ● ● ● Which sensitive
Page 39 and 40:
A Digital Journey: A Long and Windi
Page 41 and 42:
Unfortunately, some in IT may miss
Page 43 and 44:
Why Ensuring Cyber Resilience Has N
Page 45 and 46:
In terms of data safeguards, some o
Page 47 and 48:
Case studies Recently, the GRIMM in
Page 49 and 50:
About the Author Adam Nichols is th
Page 51 and 52:
With 3G and 4G, mobile operators an
Page 53 and 54:
Don’t Wait, Automate How An Indep
Page 55 and 56:
configuration, but also for faster
Page 57 and 58:
Data breaches can lead to huge fina
Page 59 and 60:
Whom Do You Give Access to Communit
Page 61 and 62: Reapproaching Cybersecurity in A Di
Page 63 and 64: isk having to pay any fines? The an
Page 65 and 66: Penetration testing essence Being o
Page 67 and 68: In a nutshell Brand reputation and
Page 69 and 70: Plan Planning for ICS Security need
Page 71 and 72: About the Author Dirk Schrader is t
Page 73 and 74: Joseph Carson, chief security scien
Page 75 and 76: 1. Educate your people on the impor
Page 77 and 78: we’ve dealt with many breaches th
Page 79 and 80: Clean Water Shows Us Why Cyber Cert
Page 81 and 82: How Can You Protect the Security Pe
Page 83 and 84: Best Practices for Mitigating Insid
Page 85 and 86: Why We Care About Cybersecurity Hyg
Page 87 and 88: The Third-Party Remote Access Secur
Page 89 and 90: Evaluating Third-Party Security Pra
Page 91 and 92: wake of the massive SolarWinds atta
Page 93 and 94: · Rethinking Unattended Access Day
Page 95 and 96: About The Author Ryan Heidorn is a
Page 97 and 98: In the traditional fortress model,
Page 99 and 100: Threat Hunting: Taking Action to Pr
Page 101 and 102: posture built on anticipating the u
Page 103 and 104: • Organizations depend upon CISOs
Page 105 and 106: Two Sides of the Same Coin: Providi
Page 107 and 108: security protocols. Given the const
Page 109 and 110: In this article, we will explain wh
Page 111: Protect Your Business from DDoS Att
Page 115 and 116: Cyber Defense eMagazine - June 2021
Page 125 and 126: FREE MONTHLY CYBER DEFENSE EMAGAZIN
Page 129: Cyber Defense eMagazine - June 2021
show all

Cyber Defense eMagazine June 2021 Edition

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?