04.06.2021 Views

In Defence of De-Persons by Johanna Hedva

I created this zine based on research into DIY spaces and their connection with the aesthetics of zines. Pulling inspiration from zines as a method to disseminate theory, I used the essay In Defence of De-Persons by Johanna Hedva (located online here: http://gutsmagazine.ca/in/). I inserted hand-drawn illustrations and other graphics to pay homage to zines while exploring non-normative typesetting.

I created this zine based on research into DIY spaces and their connection with the aesthetics of zines. Pulling inspiration from zines as a method to disseminate theory, I used the essay In Defence of De-Persons by Johanna Hedva (located online here: http://gutsmagazine.ca/in/). I inserted hand-drawn illustrations and other graphics to pay homage to zines while exploring non-normative typesetting.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I cannot think of a form of embodiment

that is not somehow disordered.

The enforcing of self-possession

has happened probably because

of the self’s radical disorder.

How this can feel unbearable has

resulted in the political implication

that we are all ungovernable. “Governance

then becomes the management

of self-management,” as Moten

and Harney write.

I forgive myself for my impulse to

call for the ousting of the Healthy

White & Propertied Male from the

throne of the universal subject position

that he’s sat in for so long. The

direction to go, we are conditioned

to believe, is up. Like birds trapped

in a room.

But it’s the throne itself that we m-

ust tear down: the throne on which

the universal sits. That there is a

throne at all is the problem—regardless

of who sits in it. We don’t need

to go up. Let’s look to the windows,

the way out.

We who are blasted apart, de-person-ed, detached from “being,” if we are looking toward

that throne of universality to consolidate and stabilize us as subjects, to make us

whole as people, to bestow upon us, finally, a political agency that we can call our own,

in that we can own it like a possession, then we are looking in the wrong direction. The

place to begin is by turning our backs on that throne, and toward an agency that doesn’t

depend on enlightenment humanism, on the universal, on the self-determined subject

of a rational mind, on the hegemonic figure who has power over himself and others.

Such an agency can only function by constructing against its human, the monster, the

monstrosity of the Other. If our kind of agency depends on anything, it will depend on

recognizing and honouring that we are all of us disordered, messy, incorrigible, that we

are in relationship to others and interdependent on each other, as much as we are each

of us different—and that is fine.

The APA has a “topic” page on their

website for “Emotional Health” that

defines it like this:

Emotional health can lead

to success in work, relationships

and health. In the

past, researchers believed

that success made people

happy. Newer research reveals

that it’s the other way

around. Happy people are

more likely to work toward

goals, find the resources

they need and attract others

with their energy and optimism—key

building blocks of

success.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!