16.06.2021 Views

Managerial Economics - Christopher R. Thomas-S. Charles Maurice

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 1 Managers, Profits, and Markets 21

known as uniform pricing. In Chapter 14, we will show you several advanced

pricing techniques, which charge different buyers different prices and generate

even more revenue than with uniform prices.

These are just a few of the many mistakes we will teach you how to avoid. Don’t

be concerned at this point if you’re not sure you understand these mistakes—we

guarantee you will by the end of the text!

1.3 SEPARATION OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF THE FIRM

principal–agent

relationship

Relationship formed

when a business owner

(the principal) enters

an agreement with an

executive manager (the

agent) whose job is to

formulate and implement

tactical and strategic

business decisions that

will further the objectives

of the business owner

(the principal).

Business owners frequently choose to delegate control of their businesses to a professional

executive or senior manager who will typically be assisted by additional

subordinate managers, which creates an executive management team that relieves

the owners of management duties. Only in the smallest business organizations—

typically sole proprietorships, smaller general partnerships, and family

businesses—are you likely to see owners managing their own businesses. The

decision to hire professional managers creates a separation between business

ownership and its management. This separation forms a special relationship between

business owners and managers known as a principal–agent relationship.

In this particular type of principle–agent relationship, a business owner (the

principal) enters an agreement with an executive manager (the agent) whose job is

to formulate and implement tactical and strategic business decisions that will further

the objectives of the business owner (the principal). 7 The agency “agreement”

can, and usually does, take the form of a legal contract to confer some degree of

legal enforceability, but it can also be something as simple as an informal agreement

settled by a handshake between the owner and manager.

Separating ownership and control of a firm holds the potential to significantly

increase a firm’s value, especially when it replaces “amateur” owner-managers

with more experienced and talented professional business decision makers. In

practice, however, some or all of the potential gain to the owners from hiring expert

managers can be lost when owners cannot prevent managers from behaving

opportunistically by taking self-interested actions that are harmful to the owners.

We will now discuss this fundamental problem arising from the separation of

ownership and management and examine some ways to solve or at least control

the severity of these problems.

The Principal–Agent Problem

A fundamental problem that frequently, but not always, afflicts the principal–

agent relationship between business owners and managers occurs when a

manager takes an action or makes a decision that advances the interests of the

7

We are employing here a rather specific definition of the principal–agent relationship to focus

on the agency relationship between a firm’s owners and the firm’s executive managers. Business

organizations typically form a variety principal–agent relationship in addition to the one between

owners and executive managers that we are discussing in this textbook. Several other examples of

principal–agent relationships include CEOs and other executive officers (CFO, CIO, and COO), the

boards of directors and CEOs, and CEOs and middle managers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!