06.09.2021 Views

Mathematical Analysis I, 2004a

Mathematical Analysis I, 2004a

Mathematical Analysis I, 2004a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

§§5–6. Natural Numbers. Induction 29<br />

∗ Proof. Let S be the set of all those n ∈ N for which P (n) istrue,<br />

S = {n ∈ N | P (n)}.<br />

We have to show that actually each n ∈ N is in S, i.e., N ⊆ S.<br />

First, we show that S is inductive.<br />

Indeed, by assumption (i), P (1) is true; so 1 ∈ S.<br />

Next, let x ∈ S. This means that P (x) is true. By assumption (ii), however,<br />

this implies P (x + 1), i.e., x +1∈ S. Thus<br />

1 ∈ S and (∀ x ∈ S) x +1∈ S;<br />

S is inductive.<br />

Then, by Theorem 1 (second clause), N ⊆ S, and all is proved.<br />

□<br />

This theorem is used to prove various properties of N “by induction.”<br />

Examples.<br />

(a) If m, n ∈ N, then also m + n ∈ N and mn ∈ N.<br />

To prove the first property, fix any m ∈ N. LetP (n) mean<br />

m + n ∈ N<br />

(n ∈ N).<br />

Then<br />

(i) P (1) is true, for as m ∈ N, the definition of N yields m +1∈ N,<br />

i.e., P (1).<br />

(ii) P (k) ⇒ P (k +1) for k ∈ N. Indeed,<br />

P (k) ⇒ m + k ∈ N ⇒ (m + k)+1∈ N<br />

⇒ m +(k +1)∈ N ⇒ P (k +1).<br />

Thus, by Theorem 1 ′ , P (n) holdsforall n; i.e.,<br />

(∀ n ∈ N) m + n ∈ N<br />

for any m ∈ N.<br />

To prove the same for mn, weletP (n) mean<br />

mn ∈ N (n ∈ N)<br />

and proceed similarly.<br />

(b) If n ∈ N, then n − 1=0or n − 1 ∈ N.<br />

For an inductive proof, let P (n) mean<br />

n − 1=0orn − 1 ∈ N<br />

(n ∈ N).<br />

Then proceed as in (a).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!