24.12.2012 Views

STATE OF FLORIDA - Public Service Commission

STATE OF FLORIDA - Public Service Commission

STATE OF FLORIDA - Public Service Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORDER NO. PSC-12-0102-F<strong>OF</strong>-WS<br />

DOCKET NO. 100330-WS<br />

PAGE 16<br />

System<br />

V i e Water WWTP<br />

Peace River m<br />

sunny Hills m<br />

(a) Viage Water WWTP<br />

county Current Staius<br />

Polk DEP Consent Order<br />

HaTdee DEP Consent Order<br />

Highlands DEP Consent Order<br />

AUF witness Luitweiler testilied that the previous owner of the Village Water wastewater<br />

system constructed the ponds below the ground water table. A combination of DEP regulations,<br />

policies, and actions has created an inkactable situation for this small, predominantly industrial<br />

wastewater system. AUF continues to pursue two solutions: (1) leasing laud and constrncting a<br />

spray field and associated piping, and (2) entering into an agreement with the City of Lakeland<br />

and building infiastruc ture to convey hated effluent through an effluent disposal pipeline to an<br />

electric generating statiox~ Pursuant to the consent order, AUF has executed a long-term lease<br />

with a nearby property owner for land for a spray field for effluent disposal, and has completed<br />

the soil evaluation and the prelimiwry design of the spray fields. The findings of the soil<br />

evaluation prompted AUF to negotiate with DEP an extension of the deadlines in the consent<br />

order to give AUF time to take one last look at an alternative involving use of the effluent<br />

disposal system operated by the City of Lakeland. Discussions with the City of Lakeland are<br />

contin-, however, without at least partial funding fivm the WMD, witness Luitweiler believes<br />

that this alternative is not likely to be economically viable. The WMD has advised that fundkg<br />

is not likely to be available. Both solutions are prohibitively expensive for this system with 48<br />

industrial customers. The WWTP has operated for 30 months with only one exceedance of a<br />

permit limit reported on monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs). AUF has continued a<br />

dialog with DEP about the impact (or lack there00 of the status quo, regulatory obstacles to<br />

potential alte-matives, and the potential impact on rates (which is substantial). Witness<br />

Luitweiler tedied that just the capital cost of the spray field solution alone is approximately<br />

$354,915, and just the capital cost of the Lakeland interconnect solution alone is approximak1y<br />

$527,555.<br />

Staff-sponsored DEP wilness Greenwell testilied that the Village W e wastewater<br />

faciity was significantly out of compliance. and that the Utility has been unable to address the<br />

long-term disposal solution for the ponds and the inadequate maintenance. of the ponds. Wilness<br />

Greenwell pointed out that a consent order was executed on August 21,2007, for operating the<br />

facility without a permit and failure to maintain the ponds, including proper access control. The<br />

consent order has been amended multiple times and remains open. Witness Greenwell further<br />

stated that while AUF still remains out of compliance with the pond issue, the consent order<br />

gives them a certain amount of relief and AUF is attempting to find a comtive action to address<br />

the pond disposal issue.<br />

@) Peace River m<br />

AUF witness Luitweiler and M-sponsored witness Greenwell testified with respect to<br />

the DEP commt order h m June 2010 for the Peace River water system that required AUF to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!