92. EVIDENCE FOR CREATION in 6 DAYS in 4074 BC - Answers

26. Most binary stars circling one another are of different composition. Big Bang theory can’t
explain this.
27. Stars within globular clusters ought to be all crashing into one another if any nonthinking
force brought them together, but they are not.
28. Stars never get closer than 3.5 light years apart. Would randomness produce this? No.
29. Stellar evolution is non-observable. Stars are not evolving in space. Plants and
animals are not evolving on earth.
30. The sun would have to spin extremely fast to hurl off planets and moons, yet it rotates
very slowly.
31. Big Bang theory cannot explain where stars, planets and moons originated, nor how
they arrived at their present precise, intricate orbits. How could every moon be located
at the precise distance to keep it from flying into or away from its planet, from a Big
Bang explosion?
32. Uranus and Venus rotate backward compared to all the other planets. The other 7 rotate
forward.
33. One third of the 60 moons rotate opposite to the rotational direction of their planets.
Why?
34. Our planets and moons are so strikingly different that they could not have originated
from the same Big Bang source. “If you look at all the planets and the 60 or so satellites
(moons), it’s very hard to find two that are the same.” (Ross Taylor of ANU Canberra, in
“The Solar Systems New Diversity”, Richard Kerr, Science 265, 2 Sep 1994, p.1360).
35. The chemical makeup of Earth’s moon and Earth are distinctly different, implying that
the moon formed under different conditions.
36. Nearly all of Saturn’s 17 moons are extremely different. It has 3 sets of moons sharing
the same orbit. Some moons travel clockwise, others travel anti-clockwise. The surface
of Iapetus is 5 times darker on one side than the other. Hyperion is potato shaped.
Enceladus has an extremely smooth surface, whereas other moons are much rougher.
Why? Titan’s atmosphere is thicker than earth’s.
How could all these moons originate by chance?
Elemental Forces of the Universe.
37. Gravity Force is perfectly balanced.
a) If gravity were stronger, smaller stars could not form.
b) If gravity were weaker, bigger stars could not form, no heavy elements could exist,
only dwarf stars would exist, which would radiate light too feebly to support life.
38. Proton/Neutron mass ratio
The neutron mass can only exceed the proton mass by twice the electron’s mass (About 1
part per 1000).
a) If the proton to neutron mass ratio were less, atoms would fly apart.
b) If the proton to neutron mass ratio were greater, atoms would crush together, quickly
decaying into a neutron, positron and neutrino, thus destroying hydrogen, the main
element in the universe.
The Master Designer planned that the proton’s mass would be slightly smaller than a
neutron’s mass, otherwise the universe would collapse. If protons decayed, the universe
would collapse.
39. Photon mass to Baryon mass ratio.
If this ratio were higher, stars and galaxies could not hold together by gravitational
attraction.
40. Nuclear force holds an atom together.
a) If it were smaller, there would only be hydrogen and no heavier elements.
b) If it were larger, there would be no hydrogen but only heavier elements. With no
hydrogen there would be no stable stars, and no life.
c) If it were 1% weaker or stronger, carbon could not exist, nor could life exist.
d) If it were 2% stronger, protons could not exist.
41. Electromagnetic Force in an atom binds negative charged electrons to a positively charged
nucleus
a) If it were smaller or larger, no chemical bonds could form.
b) If the electron charge were 3 times larger, no element could exist other than
hydrogen.
c) If the electron charge were one-third as large, all neutral atoms would be destroyed
by the lowest heat-such as is found in outer space.
Conclusion: It would be impossible for evolution to produce the correct balance of these
forces. They were planned. These 4 basic forces (gravitational, electromagnetic, weak and
strong nuclear forces) differ so greatly in strength, that the strongest is 10 40 times stronger
than the weakest of them. Yet Big Bang theory mathematics requires that all basic forces
had to be the same strength before and just after the Big Bang Explosion occurred.
Evolutionists cannot claim that these precise, delicate balances of forces occurred by
“natural selection”, or “mutations”, for we are here dealing with the basic properties of
matter. There is no room for gradual “evolving”. The proton-neutron mass ratio has always
been the same. It will not change. It began just right. There was no second chance. This
applies to all the other forces and balances in elemental matter and the laws of physics
governing them.
If you open a typical science book on astronomy, you will find theories about the origin of
the universe and stars stated with great certainty to the public.
By 1970, so much scientific data had repudiated the basic aspects of various cosmologies,
that in April 1972, the top minds in stellar physics, chemistry and astronomy gathered at the
Nice Symposium to resolve: a) How did the first cloud break apart and change into stars?
b) How did the gas clouds whirl to form stellar objects to solve the angular momentum
problem?
c) How did the gas push itself into solids?
d) How did the planets, with their present properties and solar distances form?
If you attend such a closed-door conference, you will find worried men, desperate theories,
scientific facts condemning these theories, a lack of alternative explanations, an
atmosphere of hopeless despair in the face of unproven ideas, and no solutions or scientific
experiments to alleviate the situation.
Key: The problem is that evolutionists do not want the public to know that scientists cannot
figure out how galaxies, stars and planets originated.
17. SCIENTISTS SPEAK AGAINST EVOLUTION
1) “In spite of nearly a century of work and discussion there is still no unanimity in regard to
the details of the means of evolution”. R. Goldschmidt, “Evolution viewed by one
Geneticist”, “American Scientist, Vol. 409, Jan 1952, p.84
2) “Evolution is baseless and quite incredible”. (Ambrose Flemming, President of British
Association for Advancement of Science).
3) “Today our duty is to destroy the myths of evolution. Some refuse to acknowledge the
inadequacies and falsity of their beliefs”. (Pierre-Paul Grasse).
4) “Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con men, and
the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever.” (T.N. Tahmisian, Physiologist for
the Atomic Energy Commission, quoted in Fresno Bee, 20 Aug. 1959).