25.12.2012 Views

The Ferrar papers, 1590-1790, in Magdalene College ... - Microform

The Ferrar papers, 1590-1790, in Magdalene College ... - Microform

The Ferrar papers, 1590-1790, in Magdalene College ... - Microform

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reverend Joshua Mapletoft, <strong>in</strong> Essex, but <strong>in</strong> the 1630s many letters<br />

also passed between three generations of <strong>Ferrar</strong> women: cdd Mrs<br />

<strong>Ferrar</strong> td.1634), her daughter Susanna Collett (d.1657) who was<br />

sometimes at Little Gidd<strong>in</strong>g and sometimes at Bourn <strong>in</strong><br />

Cambridgeshire, and the five eldest of Susanna's eight daughters,<br />

of whom three married and left home, respectively <strong>in</strong> 1628, 1635,<br />

and 1636.<br />

<strong>The</strong> silence thalt fell on Little Gidd<strong>in</strong>g for about a decade<br />

after Nicholas Ferriir's death <strong>in</strong> 1637 is rendered less noticeable<br />

by the later acquisition of Brooke family letters. In 1657 John<br />

<strong>Ferrar</strong> I1 married Anne Rrcsnke, the daughter of a Leicestershire<br />

knight. Sir Thomas Brooke was a member of a Midlands cous<strong>in</strong>age of<br />

Feild<strong>in</strong>gs, Herr idges, Braukes and Caves: and when Anne's sister<br />

Goodeth died Ln 1631 without surviv<strong>in</strong>g descendants, a small number<br />

of Brooke <strong>papers</strong>, the earliest dat<strong>in</strong>g from 1616, came to Little<br />

Gidd<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

By the 3640s <strong>Ferrar</strong> thrift had <strong>in</strong>troduced a habit which<br />

compl icates a cataloguer's task: John <strong>Ferrar</strong> and his two children,<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong>ia and John 13, began re-us<strong>in</strong>g earlier items from the<br />

collection for draft<strong>in</strong>g letters, keep<strong>in</strong>g estate accounts, or<br />

record<strong>in</strong>g the bus<strong>in</strong>ess of local government. Where the later<br />

writ<strong>in</strong>gs are of significant length and af a markedly different date<br />

from that of the orig<strong>in</strong>al document, they have been given a separate<br />

entry <strong>in</strong> the chronological list, but <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terests of economy<br />

the documents have nc't been filmed a second time.<br />

This habit of t:hrift also extended tca John 11's son, the<br />

Reverend Thomas <strong>Ferrar</strong>, and his sonF John <strong>Ferrar</strong> IV. In sort<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the cnllection and mak<strong>in</strong>g ncqtes from it, the two of them tore from<br />

many of the letters that part of the sheet of paper which bore the<br />

address. On da<strong>in</strong>g sa, howeveri they copied the address on to the<br />

text of the letter, apparently exactly as it was given by the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al author. (I:n several cases the separated address survives,<br />

and it. has been possible to match it with its tw<strong>in</strong> text and verify<br />

the accuracy of the <strong>Ferrar</strong>s' transcriptions. 1<br />

For over a cent:ury the collection passed by <strong>in</strong>heritance from<br />

father to 5.313, descend<strong>in</strong>g from John I (~.1589-1657? to John I1<br />

(1630-17201 to John I11 (1660-17371, but even before John died<br />

childless, it apparently passed to his next brother, the Reverend<br />

Thcmas <strong>Ferrar</strong> 11663--1739:). His elder san, John <strong>Ferrar</strong> IV (i7@@-<br />

17313?, hav<strong>in</strong>g died unmarried some months before his father, the<br />

estate together with the ccdlection passed first to his younger<br />

brother Thomas (1707-48), who also died unmarried, and then to his<br />

sister Judith

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!