Blue Chip Issue 85

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BLUE CHIP INFLATION FORGET SOFT LANDINGS How much of a recession is needed to tame inflation? We look back at how inflation responded in previous downturns to help gauge the scale of the adjustment in growth and unemployment needed to tame it this time around. Since the last interest rate move by the Federal Reserve (Fed) on 27 July, investors have taken a more optimistic view of when the central bank can bring monetary tightening to a close. Markets are now pricing in a “Fed pivot” in late 2023, when the central bank is expected to cut interest rates. Two factors have supported the move. First, Jerome Powell, chair of Federal Reserve of the United States (US), has said that US interest rates are now neutral, indicating that the initial adjustment from the ultra-easy pandemic policy is over and that future rate decisions will be taken on a meeting-by-meeting basis depending on the data. Second, that data shows the economy cooling as retail spending and housing slow. The latest GDP figures showed the US economy contracted in the first two quarters of the year and although they overstate the weakness of the economy, final demand clearly softened. However, despite signs of slowdown the likelihood of a more pessimistic outcome on policy, where interest rates must remain higher for longer, has significantly increased in our view. The obstacle to a Fed pivot is the high level of underlying inflation and the strength of the labour market, as evidenced by the latest employment report which showed a significant increase in payrolls and a further fall in unemployment. An analysis of past cycles shows that it would be a rare achievement for an economy which is so late in its cycle to bring inflation back to target without a fall in activity, or an outright recession. In our view, it would be better if the Fed took a leaf out of the Bank of England’s playbook and acknowledged this, rather than projecting soft landings. CYCLES AND INFLATION: A LOOK BACK AT THE PEAK The rapid rebound in the US since the economy reopened from Covid restrictions last year has taken activity above its long-run trend, as evidenced by a tight labour market and high-capacity utilisation rates in industry. At 3.5% the unemployment rate is well below estimates of equilibrium, or the Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment (NAIRU) (the lowest level of unemployment that can occur in the economy before inflation starts to rise). The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) put this at 4.4% in the second quarter. Meanwhile, CPI inflation has risen to 9.1%, its highest level for 40 years. Relative to previous peaks since 1960, the current position compares with an average CPI inflation rate of 6.1% and an unemployment rate 0.5% below the NAIRU (Chart 1). Chart 1: US inflation and unemployment – today versus previous cycles Source: Refinitiv, NBER, Schroders, 1 August 2022. 605742 62 www.bluechipdigital.co.za
INFLATION BLUE CHIP Chart 2: Growth – inflation trade-offs during recessions Source: Refinitiv, NBER, Schroders, 1 August 2022. 605742 The US is clearly late in its cycle and as signs of slower growth come through, we would argue that the economy probably reached a peak relative to trend in the current quarter. How much of a slowdown in activity is needed to bring the inflation down? To help answer this we have looked back at previous peaks in the cycle to gauge the effect of the subsequent contraction in output on unemployment and inflation. According to the NBER, there have been nine previous occasions since 1960 where the economy has been at a peak. In each case the economy then went into recession, before troughing out several months later. The last such contraction took place between February and April 2020 – the shortest recession on record. Prior contractions in the US since 1960 have lasted between six and 18 months and are more typical of what we might expect going forward. Looking at those eight cycles, the average fall in GDP was 1.6% from peak to trough and the unemployment rate rose by 2.5 percentage points (pp), moving from below to above the NAIRU. On the CPI measure, inflation fell by 1.5 pp on average. There was a wide range of experience, with inflation falling by more than average during the “Great Recession” of 2007-09 and the second “Volcker” recession of 1981-82, when GDP fell 3.8% and 2.5% and inflation by 5.5 and 6.2 pp respectively. The worst outcome in terms of the growth-inflation trade-off was 1973-75 when, despite a contraction of 3.1% in GDP, inflation rose 2%, a severe case of stagflation (see Chart 2). So how does this relate to the current position? So far, we have seen that a significant fall in GDP has been needed to bring a major fall in inflation. For example, a six pp fall in CPI inflation from current levels to 3% would require a decline in GDP of just over three pp based on the two major recessions mentioned above. In terms of the impact on jobs, the unemployment rate would rise by around four pp to 7½%. From this perspective, the Fed’s projected soft landing where growth slows to just below 2% and inflation falls below 3% in 2023 looks like wishful thinking. However, before we dismiss the Fed’s forecasts completely, we need to dig deeper into the current high CPI inflation rate. Are there reasons to believe that inflation may come down more easily, ie with less output loss or a smaller increase in unemployment? To start, commodity prices have played a significant role in boosting inflation. If we strip these out, then inflation on the Fed’s preferred measure (the core PCE deflator) is running at 5.2%. A fall in inflation back to 2% from here would be less onerous. However, the sensitivity of core PCE inflation to changes in GDP is also lower. For example, in the two major recessions cited earlier the impact of GDP on inflation is more than halved, so we would still need a three pp fall in GDP to generate a fall in core inflation of just over 2%. Nonetheless, that would still bring inflation closer to target. Would such a downturn in the US also lead to lower commodity prices, helping to drive headline inflation down further? In the past a US recession could be expected to trigger just such a fall as global demand weakens, but today the outcome would be very dependent on how the world economy adjusts to the www.bluechipdigital.co.za 63
Page 1:
Issue 85 • Oct/Nov/Dec 2022 BLUE
Page 4:
CONTENTS ISSUE 85 OCT/NOV/DEC 2022
Page 7 and 8:
JEAN MINNAAR - MANAGING DIRECTOR -
Page 9 and 10:
We look forward to seeing you at th
Page 11 and 12:
A massive thank you to all our atte
Page 13 and 14: Connect with a Momentum Financial A
Page 15 and 16: Advice software. Built for better p
Page 17 and 18: The power of balance Equilibrium is
Page 20 and 21: BLUE CHIP COLUMN PASSION FOR OUR PR
Page 22 and 23: BLUE CHIP FPI THE VALUE OF A FINANC
Page 24 and 25: BLUE CHIP FPI FPI as our members ar
Page 26 and 27: BLUE CHIP FPI B-BBEE points to cons
Page 28 and 29: BLUE CHIP FINANCIAL PLANNER OF THE
Page 32 and 33: The smart solution for financial ad
Page 34 and 35: Tax Planning 2022
Page 38 and 39: BLUE CHIP INVESTMENT RISKY BUSINESS
Page 40 and 41: BLUE CHIP INVESTMENT Upside without
Page 42 and 43: BLUE CHIP DFM Choosing a Discretion
Page 44 and 45: BLUE CHIP INVESTMENT Imagine the fu
Page 46 and 47: BLUE CHIP OIL AND GAS Good news for
Page 48 and 49: BLUE CHIP INVESTMENT THE UNLOVED OF
Page 50 and 51: BLUE CHIP HEDGE FUNDS Is there stil
Page 52: BLUE CHIP HEDGE FUNDS For those who
Page 55 and 56: INVESTMENT BLUE CHIP partnering wit
Page 57 and 58: ESTATE PLANNING BLUE CHIP Do you ha
Page 59 and 60: NOMURA ASSET MANAGEMENT Beating the
Page 61 and 62: COMPREHENSIVE ASSISTANCE WITH ALL K
Page 63: INVESTMENT BLUE CHIP CoreShares Inv
Page 67 and 68: 99.5% OF THE WORLD’S MARKETS ARE
Page 69 and 70: FINANCIAL PLANNING BLUE CHIP The tw
Page 71 and 72: YOUR BUSINESS IS ABOUT CREATING AND
Page 73 and 74: BLUE CHIP PORTFOLIO FINANCIAL PLANN
Page 75 and 76: Independent Specialist Advisers Spe
Page 77 and 78: ESTATE PLANNING BLUE CHIP savings a
Page 79 and 80: LEGAL BLUE CHIP If you fail to plan
Page 81 and 82: PRIVATE CLIENT HOLDINGS IS AN AUTHO
Page 83 and 84: TECHNOLOGY BLUE CHIP approach is va
Page 86 and 87: Momentum Financial Planning is recr
Page 88 and 89: BLUE CHIP RISK MANAGEMENT THE PANDE
Page 90 and 91: BLUE CHIP COACHING Shifting the way
Page 92: WE LOOK FORWARD, SO YOU KNOW WHO TO
show all

Blue Chip Issue 85

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?