You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16 — Vanguard, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2022<br />
Flood, passivity, and acting urgently<br />
to forestall a ruined future<br />
THIS year 2022, the floods seem to<br />
have united different parts of the globe.<br />
The World Bank report estimates that<br />
1.18 billion people or 23 per cent of the<br />
world population, face significant flood<br />
risk. The floods have hit 27 of Nigeria’s 36<br />
states and impacted around 1.4 million people,<br />
according to the Ministry<br />
of Humanitarian Affairs and Disaster<br />
Management. It has been reported that more<br />
than 500 people have been killed and 90,000<br />
homes submerged, apart from supply chain<br />
disruptions. In the North Central, in<br />
particular, Koton-karfe and surrounding<br />
communities have been seriously impacted<br />
while the Orashi area of Rivers State has not<br />
been spared. Apart from unusual rains, the<br />
recent release of water from the LagdoDam<br />
in neighbouring Cameroon has also been<br />
blamed for the devastating floods. Beyond<br />
these statistics is the individual human tragedy<br />
of colossal proportions that beats our<br />
imagination. People have lost their livelihoods.<br />
The elderly and sick are displaced, food and<br />
necessities are scarce, and life becomes<br />
drudgery and misery. All these are on top of<br />
the stifling economic crisis that every Nigerian<br />
contends. Climate change and its impacts are<br />
more of a worldwide conversation than a local<br />
one. And we hope the UN Climate Change<br />
Conference 2022 (UNFCCC COP 27) in Egypt<br />
in November 2022 will make a meaningful<br />
impact on the conversation, although<br />
tremendous pessimism exists given the poor<br />
results of previous conferences. The impact of<br />
the flooding in Nigeria is exacerbated by a<br />
lack of respect for science and leadership<br />
problems. Our lack of respect for science and<br />
preference for superstition is at the root of the<br />
flood disaster we have at hand.<br />
We do not respect science; therefore, we seem<br />
not to have any place for strategic planning<br />
based on scientific evidence. The flooding<br />
problem is symbolic of a country whose<br />
leadership at all levels does not value<br />
planning, working with data and<br />
proactiveness. All the agencies in the<br />
environment sector, both local and<br />
international, based on scientific evidence,<br />
predicted the current flood ravaging our<br />
country, but nobody showed authentic<br />
leadership to provide solutions. Our leaders<br />
did not even benefit from past experiences and<br />
availability of expertise. These floods did not<br />
start this year, and Nigeria was affected in 2010<br />
and 2012. We have enough time to have learnt<br />
lessons. But there have now been many years<br />
of recurring flood disasters, and from this most<br />
recent development, it is evident that we have<br />
learnt no lessons. What lessons must we take<br />
from this flooding problem, and how can we<br />
prevent or mitigate the impact of flooding in<br />
Nigeria?<br />
First, we must take the science of<br />
environment and climatic changes serious. It<br />
is noteworthy that in the recent instances of<br />
flooding disasters, it is not the lack of data and<br />
scientific knowledge that is the problem, but<br />
the lack of effective and efficient use of the<br />
analysis from the data to plan and put in place<br />
measures to either prevent the flooding or<br />
reduce its impact. Our leaders act as if all<br />
environmental emergencies are Acts of God<br />
and, therefore, inevitable, and this is baseless<br />
and ignorance. Too much rain alone or<br />
overflowing rivers does not create much havoc<br />
when structural and procedural anti-flooding<br />
arrangements are in place. In countries where<br />
they take scientific evidence relating to<br />
flooding seriously, there are early warning<br />
signs to evacuate people and valuables,<br />
and people put in place measures to protect<br />
their homes and valuables. Government<br />
provides channels for the easy flow of water to<br />
designated areas and sets other scientific and<br />
environmental standards that reduce the<br />
impact of flooding. There should<br />
be enlightenment campaigns for Nigerians<br />
and their leaders to counter superstitious<br />
beliefs and attitudes towards flooding and<br />
elevate the supremacy of scientific facts in this<br />
regard. This knowledge will help leaders better<br />
plan for and respond to flooding in more<br />
practical ways than the current blame-shifting<br />
or complete nonchalant attitude we see among<br />
them today.<br />
Second, the first line of defence against<br />
flooding is Nigerians living in flood-prone<br />
areas. There should be scientific information<br />
on flooding, which should be made available<br />
to locals residing in the suspected flooding<br />
areas. The institutions saddled with this<br />
responsibility must be alive to it and be<br />
accountable if they fail to gather scientific data,<br />
analyse them, and inform the people about<br />
the impending flood. I must note that in the<br />
case of the Lokoja flooding, institutions<br />
provided scientific information and early<br />
warning signals about the flooding, but<br />
nothing much was done by the leadership or<br />
even the first line of defence against flood –<br />
the people. Nigerians should demand a fitfor-purpose<br />
crisis management regime<br />
against natural disasters. The National<br />
Emergency Management Agency must be well<br />
funded and properly managed to react to<br />
disasters and work in synergy with local people<br />
to plan and manage crises such as flooding.<br />
Third, being reactive to issues for which we<br />
have prior information is symptomatic of lack<br />
of proactiveness and accountability. Worse<br />
still, the leadership needed to ameliorate the<br />
impact of flooding cuts across all strata of<br />
government. The Federal Government should<br />
protect the lives and property of people in<br />
affected areas by declaring a state of<br />
emergency and<br />
The impact of the<br />
flooding in Nigeria<br />
is exacerbated by a<br />
lack of respect for<br />
science and<br />
leadership<br />
problems<br />
designating<br />
human and<br />
m a t e r i a l<br />
resources to<br />
reduce the impact<br />
o<br />
f<br />
flooding. Federal<br />
Government can<br />
use its security<br />
apparatus<br />
support and<br />
enforce evacuations, maintain dredging and<br />
waste management, and invest in flood<br />
mitigation efforts and infrastructure. In floodprone<br />
areas, Federal Government should work<br />
on enhancing food resilience and security. In<br />
times of disaster, food and medicine are<br />
essential to limit the casualties of the<br />
disaster. State government must desist from<br />
allocating land for building in designated flood<br />
plains and flood-prone areas, allowing for the<br />
construction of houses that block natural water<br />
flowing routes, or not having an effective<br />
drainage system to control flooding. The<br />
national emergency response regime must be<br />
prioritised and adequately funded to help<br />
prevent disaster (flooding) rather than reacting<br />
to the disaster. The legislature should provide<br />
a robust and adequate legal framework for<br />
dealing with flooding emergencies to ease the<br />
prevention and management of such natural<br />
or artificial disasters.<br />
Fourth, the world is facing a climate change<br />
crisis. It is not time to question the science<br />
behind it, it is time to embrace it and champion<br />
it in Africa. There is a clear opportunity for<br />
Nigerian leaders to lead the Global South in<br />
demanding accountability from the global<br />
community regarding their climate<br />
commitments, especially the Global<br />
North. The proverbial saying must apply here,<br />
“the dog should not eat faeces and the goat’s<br />
teeth decay”. Climate change results from<br />
more activities in developed countries than in<br />
developing countries. China and USA have<br />
the highest carbon footprint in the world,<br />
representing the two biggest industrialised<br />
nations. China is the world’s largest emitter<br />
of carbon dioxide gas, with 10,668 million<br />
metric tonnes emitted in 2020, followed by the<br />
US with 4,713 million metric tonnes of total<br />
carbon dioxide emissions by 2020. Nigeria’s<br />
emission is relatively and comparatively<br />
insignificant.<br />
Continues online: www.vanguardngr.com<br />
to