09.12.2022 Views

tg_efficacy_pt18pt19_superseded_en

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transitional Guidance on PT18 + PT19

September 2016

63

Products with a repellent effect, which are applied on the human skin or clothes, can be

tested in an “arm-in-cage” simulated-use test. The repellent is applied in the specified

dose on the (bare) forearm of the test person. The forearm is subsequently exposed to

test mosquitoes in a cage for 5 minutes. This should be repeated every hour, at least up

to the claimed efficacy period. If one bite is received during an exposure followed by

another bite in the next exposure (confirming the first bite), the test should be stopped

and the time of the first confirmed bite recorded as the length of repellence. If bites are

not received in succession, then the test is continued and the first bite should be

considered ‘unconfirmed’. The same test is repeated with untreated forearms of,

preferably, the same test persons. For the untreated forearm, a minimum of 5 lands in 5

minutes is required to qualify the test. Once 5 lands are received, the arm should be

removed to prevent excess biting. If less than 5 lands are counted in 5 minutes, then the

test should not proceed and the mosquito cage should be replaced with ‘fresh’

mosquitoes. The results of treated and untreated forearms are compared.

Alternative methods using rabbits are developed. The repellent solution could be applied

directly on the skin of a rabbit on which a cage containing female mosquitoes is placed.

Skin repellents can also be tested in and experimental hut, as long as the number of

mosquitoes entering the hut is not too low.

Similar tests can be used for cloth in which a repellent is incorporated (treated article).

Repellent effectiveness is based on protection time, that is, the time between repellent

application and the time of 2 or more bites on the treated arm, or the first confirmed bite

(a bite followed by another within 30 min.).

For products with a repellent effect, which are applied in another way (not on the human

skin or clothes, for instance spatial repellents), no common protocols are available.

These products can be tested in a simulated use test, for instance in an experimental

hut. The submitted data from studies are checked for completeness, based on the

applied dose per treated area. It is also checked whether the duration of exposure is

sufficient. If the formulation alone i.e. without the carrier (e.g. a product with a tissue as

carrier) has been tested, data on release from the carrier are also required. The study

data should provide a clear picture of the efficacy of the product.

When the label claim says that the product should be used in ventilated rooms the

opening of windows and doors should be simulated in the test.

14.2.2.3.5 Larvicides simulated use tests

In small scale simulated-use tests, insecticide formulation can be tested in natural

breeding sites or simulated larval breeding sites. When natural larval populations are

used pre-treatment assessments of the population should done at the site (larval count

by dipping technique). Depending on the protocol, eggs or larvae can be regularly

introduced in the treated sites to evaluate the residual efficacy. Breeding sites are kept

uncovered to allow wild adults to lay their eggs. The methodology of this test is

described in WHO guidelines (WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/2005.13).

14.2.2.4 Field trials

For some products against mosquitoes, field trials are not required. Especially when field

populations are used in the lab or in an experimental hut. However, for some products

and uses a simulated-use test cannot mimic the practical situation sufficiently (e.g.

larvicides used in large swamps and lakes, aerial applications). Especially with aerial

applications the way the product is dispersed can make a difference for efficacy. In these

cases the competent authorities should require a field test.

Tests are done preferably during spring and beginning of summer. In autumn population

decline might be due to natural causes instead of the insecticide. Larvicides should

normally be tested in July-August when sufficient levels of Culex spp. and Aedes spp.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!