26.12.2012 Views

Senate Bill 50 and School Facility Fees - California's Coalition for ...

Senate Bill 50 and School Facility Fees - California's Coalition for ...

Senate Bill 50 and School Facility Fees - California's Coalition for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a. Governing board makes a “timely application” to the SAB <strong>for</strong> new construction funding<br />

<strong>for</strong> which it is eligible <strong>and</strong> is determined by SAB to meet the eligibility requirements <strong>for</strong> new<br />

construction set <strong>for</strong>th in Education Code Sections 17071.10 et seq. <strong>and</strong> §17071.75 et seq. (Govt.<br />

Code §65995.5(b)(1) A school district which submits an application to determine its eligibility<br />

is deemed eligible if the SAB fails to notify the district within 120 days of receipt of the<br />

application<br />

The committee believes that the only “application” referred to in Section 65995.5(b)(1) is SAB<br />

<strong>50</strong>-03 which is used to request an eligibility determination based on the in<strong>for</strong>mation in Forms<br />

SAB <strong>50</strong>-01 <strong>and</strong> SAB <strong>50</strong>-02. (See SAB Emergency Regulations (“E.R.”) §§1859.20 <strong>and</strong> 1859.<strong>50</strong>)<br />

However, we underst<strong>and</strong> that the building industry may believe that the “application” referred to<br />

in the first sentence of Section 65995.5(b)(1) is actually SAB <strong>50</strong>-04 by which a district requests<br />

funding <strong>for</strong> a specific project.<br />

In order to preclude any legal challenge on this issue, the committee suggests that districts<br />

consider filing an SAB Form <strong>50</strong>-04 <strong>for</strong> at least one project concurrently with their filing of SAB<br />

Forms <strong>50</strong>-01, <strong>50</strong>-02, <strong>and</strong> <strong>50</strong>-03, or as soon as possible thereafter. Although the SAB requires<br />

that the Division of State Architect (“DSA”) must have approved the plans <strong>and</strong> specifications <strong>for</strong><br />

the project <strong>for</strong> which funding is sought, it should be kept in mind that a qualifying SAB Form<br />

<strong>50</strong>-04 could be filed (<strong>and</strong> funding requested) <strong>for</strong> a single relocatable structure.<br />

b. Satisfy at least 1 of the 4 requirements listed below until Jan. 1, 2000 <strong>and</strong> then on <strong>and</strong><br />

after Jan. 1, 2000 satisfy 2 of the 4 following requirements: (Govt. Code §65995.5(b)(3))<br />

(1) Multi Track Year Round Education (MTYRE) Requirement<br />

(a) Have at least 30% of K-6 enrollment in high school attendance area of growth on<br />

MTYRE <strong>for</strong> unified <strong>and</strong> elementary school districts; (Govt. Code §65995.5(b)(3)(A))<br />

or<br />

(b) Have at least 30% of high school district enrollment on MTYRE; (Govt. Code<br />

§65995.5(b)(3)(A)(i))<br />

(c) Have at least 40% of K-12 enrollment within the boundaries of the high school<br />

attendance area <strong>for</strong> which the district is applying <strong>for</strong> funding on MTYRE (Govt. Code<br />

§65995.5(b)(3)(A)(ii))<br />

(2) The district has placed a local bond measure on the ballot in the past 4 years which<br />

received at least <strong>50</strong>% plus 1 of the votes (Govt. Code §65995.5(b)(3)(B))<br />

(3) The district meets one of the following criteria (Govt. Code §65995.5(b)(3)(C)):<br />

(a) The district has issued debt or incurred obligations <strong>for</strong> capital outlay equal to 15% of<br />

local bonding capacity including indebtedness repaid from:<br />

or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!