11.05.2023 Views

Depp v Heard: the unreal story extract chapters 1-2

Johnny Depp: monstrous wife-beater? Innocent victim of Amber Heard’s abuse? Or is the reality more complex? Depp v Heard: the unreal story is the definitive account of the gruelling court battles between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, by the reporter who was there. Using witness testimony and contemporaneous evidence, Nick Wallis has created a gripping reconstruction of the allegations of violence, drug-taking and wild extravagance which dominated two epic trials and made headlines around the world. Nick also weaves in his own reportage and insights, bringing the courtroom drama to life and analysing how courts in the UK and USA arrived at conflicting conclusions. If you want to know who to believe, Depp v Heard: the unreal story is your conclusive guide to what really happened. This is an extract from Depp v Heard: the unreal story by Nick Wallis

Johnny Depp: monstrous wife-beater? Innocent victim of Amber Heard’s abuse? Or is the reality more complex?

Depp v Heard: the unreal story is the definitive account of the gruelling court battles between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, by the reporter who was there. Using witness testimony and contemporaneous evidence, Nick Wallis has created a gripping reconstruction of the allegations of violence, drug-taking and wild extravagance which dominated two epic trials and made headlines around the world.

Nick also weaves in his own reportage and insights, bringing the courtroom drama to life and analysing how courts in the UK and USA arrived at conflicting conclusions.

If you want to know who to believe, Depp v Heard: the unreal story is your conclusive guide to what really happened.

This is an extract from Depp v Heard: the unreal story by Nick Wallis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Uk Trial 5<br />

absolutely necessary. The whole world was a mess. But now <strong>the</strong> news<br />

desk was sending me to cover a celebrity libel trial at <strong>the</strong> High Court,<br />

brought by an American movie star. This would be unusual at <strong>the</strong> best of<br />

times. During an apparent apocalypse, it seemed almost preposterous.<br />

‘He’s not going to actually be <strong>the</strong>re, is he?’ I asked.<br />

‘We think so,’ replied my ever-knowledgeable editor. ‘He’s definitely<br />

in <strong>the</strong> country.’<br />

I read into <strong>the</strong> <strong>story</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> next morning travelled up to London<br />

on an empty train. As soon as I saw <strong>the</strong> snappers lined up along <strong>the</strong><br />

temporary crush barriers outside <strong>the</strong> Royal Courts of Justice, I realised<br />

<strong>Depp</strong> was almost certainly going to be <strong>the</strong>re. Paps don’t go where <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>story</strong> isn’t. But <strong>the</strong>y did look incongruous – as if <strong>the</strong>y’d been teleported<br />

from <strong>the</strong> centre of a buzzy celebrity premiere to an almost wholly deserted<br />

central London.<br />

Inside <strong>the</strong> normally bustling Royal Courts of Justice Great Hall, it<br />

was eerily quiet. To aid social distancing, five separate courts had been<br />

set aside for <strong>Depp</strong> v NGN. The main Court 13 was for <strong>the</strong> judge, <strong>the</strong><br />

protagonists and <strong>the</strong> important lawyers. An overspill court was handed<br />

to less important lawyers. Two (initially under-populated) courts<br />

were given to spectators and one court in <strong>the</strong> completely separate West<br />

Green Wing was reserved for <strong>the</strong> perennial dirt on <strong>the</strong> legal system’s<br />

shoe – reporters.<br />

To be fair, Court 38 was spacious, air-conditioned and comfortable.<br />

Plug sockets, rare as hen’s teeth in <strong>the</strong> nineteenth-century main courts,<br />

were plentiful and easy to access. I took a seat among twenty or so fellow<br />

hacks, and decided I would have a pop at live-tweeting <strong>the</strong> trial.<br />

Accredited journalists and legal commentators are allowed to livetweet<br />

court proceedings in <strong>the</strong> UK without first asking <strong>the</strong> permission<br />

of <strong>the</strong> presiding judge. I figured a court case featuring Johnny <strong>Depp</strong><br />

might be of interest to <strong>the</strong> twittersphere, and I was sure Channel 5<br />

wouldn’t mind me offering a blow-by-blow commentary, especially as<br />

I could point any new and existing followers towards <strong>the</strong> evening news<br />

programme and my end-of-day TV report.<br />

I asked my colleagues, by now all seated in Court 38, if Johnny<br />

<strong>Depp</strong> had definitely turned up. There were murmurs of affirmation.<br />

One reporter produced his phone and showed me a freshly-published<br />

paparazzi shot of <strong>the</strong> star making his way up <strong>the</strong> steps of <strong>the</strong> main entrance<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Royal Courts of Justice. <strong>Depp</strong> was wearing shades and a<br />

bandana face mask. He looked cool. I plugged in my laptop, booted up<br />

TweetDeck and established a connection to <strong>the</strong> outside world with my<br />

mobile phone. I told my followers where I was and why, adding that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!