26.09.2023 Views

CFS-WB-CH04

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4

Aa

VOCABULARY

Philosophy: The study of

ultimate reality and its causes

by human reason alone. From

the Greek word philosophia,

which means “love of wisdom.”

Five Ways: Five arguments

developed by St. Thomas

Aquinas that use human

reason and observation of the

created world to conclude that

God exists. Also called the

“five proofs for the existence

of God.”

The Love of Wisdom

The term philosophy comes from the Greek word philosophia, which

means “love of wisdom,” but is commonly used today to mean “worldview.”

For example, you may have been asked, “What is your philosophy

of life?” That modern meaning is not how we are using the word here.

Instead, we will use its actual meaning: a reasoned study of the truth of

things.

The great Medieval philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas believed that

philosophy could tell us a lot about God. St. Thomas is famous for using

logical reasoning to prove God’s existence: there must be one uncaused

being which created everything else — and this reality is referred

to as God. Using his “Five Ways,” or five proofs for God’s existence, we

can simply look at the world around us and, by using reason, conclude

the existence of the Creator.

Before we delve into the arguments themselves, it would be beneficial

to understand what a philosophical proof is and how it works. To

begin, bear in mind that philosophical proofs function differently than

the scientific method, which relies upon empirical data and experimentation

for proof. Philosophical proofs depend upon logic as well as formulated

premises, which are readily verifiable or proven by a prior argument.

For a philosophical proof to be valid (true), the logic must be

sound, and the premises of the argument must be verifiable in some

way. Philosophical proofs can be challenging to understand, but they

are valid even if we may not fully comprehend them. The same is true of

the scientific method. For example, just because one does not understand

the law of thermodynamics does not mean the law does not exist.

The same is true when it comes to proving God’s existence.

The most basic structure of a philosophical proof has two premises

and a conclusion. We call the first premise the major premise, and

the second the minor premise. A proof ends with a conclusion that

follows logically (in other words, it must be true) from the rational coherence

of the two premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion

must be true. The conclusion can then become a premise to another

proof, and so on.

Armed with this understanding of how a philosophical proof works,

let us now turn specifically to Aquinas’ Five Ways and a more modern

argument for God’s existence.

70 Apologetics I: The Catholic Faith and Science

© Magis Center

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!