03.03.2024 Views

Manta Project Fiji Impact Report 2023

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Feeding Sites

Zooplankton Diversity

Non-Feeding Site

Acetate Protozoa, 4%

Chaetognaths, 5%

Chaetognaths, 4%

Chaetognaths, 4%

Chaetognaths, 2%

Copepod, 75%

Lucifer sp., 8%

Copepod, 88%

Copepod, 81%

Lucifer sp., 4%

Copepod, 94%

Sagitella, 5%

Lucifer sp., 11%

Lucifer sp., 15%

Copepod, 100%

Assessing the foraging

habitat of oceanic

manta rays in laucala

bay, FIji

Suva

Viti Levu

Laucala Bay

Project Overview

Oceanic Manta Ray

(Mobula birostris)

This research project was led and designed by University of the South Pacific

undergraduate students Karalo Drekenavere and Devavrat Bishwa and focuses

on Laucala Bay, Fiji, where recurrent sightings of M.birostris raise questions

about their ecological significance and the potential impacts of anthropogenic

activities.

The investigation examined water quality parameters, fecal coliform bacteria

concentration, microplastics, and zooplankton composition within the bay at

four foraging sites and one non-foraging site. During the study a drone was used

for real-time identification of foraging manta rays and to give the boat direction

to the specific site. Once at the specified site with the manta ray foraging water

samples and parameters were taken and a plankton net deployed.

Copepods were

present at all

sampled sites,

both feeding and

non-feeding

Lucifer sp., a species of

prawn was a surprise

finding at every feeding

site. Lucifer sp. were not

present at the

non-feeding site

Chateognaths, also

known as arrow

worms were present

at all feeding sites

but absent from the

non-feeding site

Fragments, 63%

Fibres, 32%

Line, 5%

Only copepods were

present at the non-feeding

site, displaying clear

differences between the

feeding and non-feeding

site

microplastic Distribution

Feeding Sites

Microplastic fragments accounted for

63% of all microplastics collected at

feeding sites, with fibres making up

32% and line only 5%.

Water Quality Parameters:

Lucifer sp.

Key Partner

- Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen and

Salinity

- Turbidity

- Fecal Coliform Bacteria

Fragments, 13%

Fibres, 87%

Non-feeding Site

Microplastic fibres accounted for the

majority of all microplastics collected

at non-feeding sites with 87% and

fragments only accounting for 13%.

- Microplastic Composition

The University of

the South Pacific

The University of the South Pacific marine science

campus sits on the foreshore of Laucala Bay. This

has created a great opportunity for Manta Project

Fiji and the Univeristy to work together collecting

data in this critical ecosystem.

- Zooplankton Analysis and Composition

Karalo Drekenavere (right) and Devavrat Bishwa

(left) collect water samples at foraging sites in

Laucala Bay, Suva

Laucala Bay, Suva

Feeding and non-feeding

sites displayed very

different compositions of

microplastics, possibly due

to the differing

oceanographic conditions

Microplastic Fragment

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!