The WFD CIS-SPI activity - 3rd 'Water Science Meets Policy' Event

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Diapositive 15 CF2 as defined by each? FRAGAKIS Christos (RTD); 08/11/2012
CIS-SPI – Some lessons learnt • Time resource is amongst the main constrains in a voluntary best effort approach – Work overload of CIS members was a constrain to get timely, prioritised, complete input by all CIS groups • Knowledge exchange has to be seen as a continuum. This calls for: – Permanent SPI support and structures – A strong SPI identity across the whole CIS (not just relying on the dynamism of a few motivated persons) – Relays at national and regional levels – A core group of well trained facilitators / translators – A consolidated methodology combining different approaches to conduct surveys (questionnaires, meetings, SPI correpsondents participating to other groups' meetings) • Research questions and policy questions have to be developed together – Co-creation and sharing of knowledge • Providing templates (e.g. for policy briefs) is not sufficient. Promoting their use and providing a mechanism for systematic delivery and feedback by policy makers are required • Expected results from projects should be made known at the start, with regular feedback loops and final outcomes stored in few permanent locations
Page 1 and 2: Water Science-Policy Interface: Res
Page 3 and 4: Ad-hoc activity on water Science-Po
Page 5 and 6: CIS Working Groups CIS-SPI - Method
Page 7 and 8: CIS-SPI - Some results « Water Sci
Page 9 and 10: CIS-SPI - Some results « Water Sci
Page 11 and 12: CIS-SPI - Some results Policy brief
Page 13 and 14: CIS-SPI - Some results Mapping of F
Page 15: CIS-SPI - Some results Top ten rese
Page 19 and 20: CIS-SPI: Next milestones and follow

The WFD CIS-SPI activity - 3rd 'Water Science Meets Policy' Event

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?