05.01.2013 Views

Contracts II - Gwu - George Washington University

Contracts II - Gwu - George Washington University

Contracts II - Gwu - George Washington University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROBLEM <strong>II</strong>I. (20 percent)<br />

The following edited excerpt comes from a recent case:<br />

Doorenbos Poultry keeps chickens for egg<br />

production. Midwest Hatchery sells started pullets,<br />

which are hens that have reached the age of laying eggs<br />

[about 18 weeks]. Doorenbos Poultry entered into a<br />

contract with Midwest, to purchase 112,000 pullets to<br />

be delivered on December 28 for $1.27 per pullet, plus<br />

the cost of feed from the time of hatching. The<br />

contract provided, "If Seller breaches this Contract,<br />

at Seller's option, customer is entitled to either<br />

replacement or refund of the price paid by Customer."<br />

Prior to December 28, Midwest notified Doorenbos<br />

Poultry it would be unable to deliver the chickens on<br />

the date contemplated. Doorenbos Poultry agreed to the<br />

delay, and cancelled arrangements to slaughter the<br />

approximately 110,000 chickens in one of its<br />

facilities. Over January 16, 17, and 18, Midwest<br />

delivered 115,581 pullets to Doorenbos Poultry. As the<br />

new chicks arrived, old pullets were moved out. Scott<br />

Doorenbos, the president of Doorenbos Poultry, thought<br />

the new chickens were 13 to 14 weeks of age rather than<br />

18 weeks. Doorenbos testified he could not cancel the<br />

order and return the chickens because his former flock<br />

had already been removed. He explained the barns in<br />

which the chickens are kept do not have heating.<br />

Because the buildings maintain their temperature from<br />

the body heat of the birds, Doorenbos believed water<br />

lines in the barn would have frozen if he had not kept<br />

the pullets. Doorenbos testified the pullets delivered<br />

by Midwest did not start laying eggs until February 18.<br />

Midwest sent Doorenbos Poultry an invoice for<br />

$267,916.76, [but Doorenbos Poultry did not pay]. In<br />

August, Midwest advised Doorenbos Poultry it wanted to<br />

pick up the pullets if payment was not made. Doorenbos<br />

Poultry was not interested in returning the birds. On<br />

August 19, Doorenbos Poultry sent Midwest a check for<br />

$184,135.18. [E]ighty percent of the pullets were<br />

three weeks too young, and about twenty percent were<br />

four weeks too young. Doorenbos Poultry lost $115,147<br />

by moving the previous flock out before the new flock<br />

was ready to lay eggs.<br />

Write an essay identifying and discussing any claims and<br />

defenses the parties might assert and any remedies they might<br />

seek.<br />

Page 5 of 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!