07.01.2013 Views

"Architecture or Revolution": Taylorism, Technocracy, and Social ...

"Architecture or Revolution": Taylorism, Technocracy, and Social ...

"Architecture or Revolution": Taylorism, Technocracy, and Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

on the right, there was the promise of a<br />

m<strong>or</strong>e rigidly hierarchical <strong>and</strong> stable social<br />

<strong>or</strong>der; f<strong>or</strong> those on the left, the potential<br />

triumph, in Max Weber's terms, of the<br />

rationalizing bureaucrat who upheld the<br />

public good over capitalistic individualism.<br />

Le C<strong>or</strong>busier shared this ideal of a "man<br />

of good will" but also the conservatives'<br />

strong yearning f<strong>or</strong> <strong>or</strong>der.<br />

Accompanying these auth<strong>or</strong>itarian tendencies<br />

were somewhat ambivalent attitudes<br />

in L'Esprit Nouveau towards the family<br />

<strong>and</strong> its imp<strong>or</strong>tance to social equilibrium.<br />

Le C<strong>or</strong>busier's proclamations of the house<br />

as a "machine-f<strong>or</strong>-living," his rejection<br />

of the hearth <strong>and</strong> dining table as f<strong>or</strong>mal<br />

foci, <strong>and</strong> his choice in Ville Contemp<strong>or</strong>aine<br />

to design the central business city rather<br />

than the family-<strong>or</strong>iented garden city suggest<br />

a disdain f<strong>or</strong>, <strong>or</strong> at least indifference<br />

to, the French devotion to family life. In<br />

his article "Mass-Production Houses" Le<br />

C<strong>or</strong>busier made it clear that serial production<br />

<strong>and</strong> Tayl<strong>or</strong>ism inevitably dem<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

the destruction of certain values based on<br />

tradition in the interests of efficiency:<br />

The house will no longer be an<br />

archaic entity, heavily rooted in the<br />

soil by deep foundations, built "firm<br />

<strong>and</strong> strong," the object of the devo-<br />

tion on which the cult of the family<br />

<strong>and</strong> the race has so long been con-<br />

centrated.75<br />

This challenge to traditional notions of<br />

"maison," "famille," <strong>and</strong> "patrie" was<br />

exaggerated in the minds of Le C<strong>or</strong>busier's<br />

critics by L'Esprit Nouveau's interest in<br />

psychoanalysis <strong>and</strong> sexuality. Libertine<br />

literature was often reviewed fav<strong>or</strong>ably;<br />

Andre Gide's L'Imm<strong>or</strong>aliste called "a very<br />

beautiful book filled with the most diverse<br />

virtualities. "76<br />

But Le C<strong>or</strong>busier did not reject the family<br />

outright; he only discarded some of its<br />

f<strong>or</strong>ms <strong>and</strong> customs. In fact, like most of<br />

the garden city planners, he upheld the<br />

Proudhonnian ideal of the family as the<br />

primary structural unit <strong>and</strong> as a model f<strong>or</strong><br />

other social relationships.77 Part of Le<br />

C<strong>or</strong>busier's argument f<strong>or</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardized<br />

architecture, paradoxically, was based on<br />

the preservation of this dimension of the<br />

Fig. 9 A page from L'Almanach d'architecture moderne (1925), the catalogue of the<br />

status quo:<br />

Esprit Nouveau pavilion.<br />

his town, his street, his house <strong>or</strong> his<br />

combined<br />

flat. . . hinder him [man] from fol-<br />

progressive <strong>and</strong> traditional view- po<strong>or</strong>est sect<strong>or</strong>s of society per se.<br />

lowing in his leisure the <strong>or</strong>ganic<br />

points. He was at once willing to uproot As in many of the Americanist visions<br />

development of his existence, which<br />

the "firm <strong>and</strong> strong" French family tradi- of social ref<strong>or</strong>m, there is in Le C<strong>or</strong>busier's<br />

is to create a family <strong>and</strong> to live, like<br />

tions while upholding the benevolent pater- view a blurring of distinctions between<br />

every animal on this earth <strong>and</strong> like<br />

nalism long characteristic of the French right <strong>and</strong> left. He denied the existence of<br />

all men of all ages, an<br />

housing-ref<strong>or</strong>m movement. The techno- class struggle <strong>and</strong> simultaneously de<strong>or</strong>ganized<br />

family life. In this way, society is logically innovative Ville Contemp<strong>or</strong>aine m<strong>and</strong>ed maj<strong>or</strong> transf<strong>or</strong>mations in internahelping<br />

f<strong>or</strong>ward the destruction of<br />

channeled social interaction to fit patterns tional policy <strong>and</strong> property ownership. It<br />

the family, while she sees with terr<strong>or</strong><br />

of social hierarchy <strong>and</strong> family structure. was a position that purp<strong>or</strong>ted to transcend<br />

that this will be her ruin.78<br />

Any changes in social <strong>or</strong>der resulted pri- political categ<strong>or</strong>ies; yet, in contrast to the<br />

marily in benefits f<strong>or</strong> the progressive cadre apolitical cast of Beaux-Arts academicism<br />

As with Le C<strong>or</strong>busier's polemical juxta- of modern industrual society. Lacking in (involving the passive end<strong>or</strong>sement of the<br />

position of the Parthenon <strong>and</strong> the automo- his technocratic w<strong>or</strong>ld view was any con- status quo), it was deeply engaged in social<br />

bile, his discussion of social structure cept of improving the condition of the <strong>and</strong> political issues. F<strong>or</strong> Le C<strong>or</strong>busier, as<br />

140 Art Journal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!