08.01.2013 Views

Breastfeeding as an Ecofeminist Issue - Ocean Seminary College

Breastfeeding as an Ecofeminist Issue - Ocean Seminary College

Breastfeeding as an Ecofeminist Issue - Ocean Seminary College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ody, that bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding challenges men, feminists,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d society.<br />

<strong>Bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding</strong> is a feminist issue <strong>an</strong>d a fundamental<br />

women’s issue. And, it is <strong>an</strong> issue deeply embedded<br />

in a sociocultural context. Attitudes towards<br />

bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding are intimately entwined with<br />

attitudes toward women, women’s bodies, <strong>an</strong>d who<br />

h<strong>as</strong> “ownership” of them. Patriarchy chafes at a<br />

wom<strong>an</strong> having the audacity to feed her child with<br />

her own body, under her own authority, <strong>an</strong>d without<br />

the need for <strong>an</strong>y other. Feminism sometimes<br />

chafes at the “control” over the wom<strong>an</strong>’s body<br />

exerted by the bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding inf<strong>an</strong>t.<br />

Part of the root core of patriarchy is a rejection<br />

of the female <strong>an</strong>d of women’s bodies <strong>as</strong> abnormal<br />

OR <strong>as</strong> enticing or sinful or messy, hormonal, complicated,<br />

confusing…. Authentic feminism need<br />

not be about denying biological differences between<br />

women <strong>an</strong>d men, but instead about defining<br />

both <strong>as</strong> profoundly worthy <strong>an</strong>d capable <strong>an</strong>d of<br />

never denying <strong>an</strong> opportunity to <strong>an</strong>yone for a sexb<strong>as</strong>ed<br />

re<strong>as</strong>on. Feminism c<strong>an</strong> be about creating a<br />

culture that values what is female <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> what is<br />

male, not a culture that tries to er<strong>as</strong>e or hide<br />

35<br />

Remer : <strong>Bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding</strong> <strong>as</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>Ecofeminist</strong> <strong>Issue</strong><br />

“messy” evidence of femaleness.<br />

However, precisely because of the patriarchal <strong>as</strong>sociation<br />

of the female with the earthy <strong>an</strong>d the physical,<br />

feminists have perhaps w<strong>an</strong>ted to dist<strong>an</strong>ce themselves<br />

from bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding. This intensely embodied<br />

biologically m<strong>an</strong>dated physical experience so clearly<br />

represents a fundamental difference between men<br />

<strong>an</strong>d women that it appears to bolster biological reductionism.<br />

Yet in so doing feminism then colludes<br />

with patriarchy <strong>an</strong>d itself becomes a tool of the patriarchy<br />

in the repression <strong>an</strong>d silencing of women <strong>an</strong>d<br />

their leaky ever-ch<strong>an</strong>ging, endlessly cycling bodies:<br />

these bodies that ch<strong>an</strong>ge blood into food <strong>an</strong>d bleed<br />

without dying <strong>an</strong>d provide safe p<strong>as</strong>sage for new souls<br />

upon the earth. Sometimes the issue of a wom<strong>an</strong>’s<br />

right not to bre<strong>as</strong>tfeed is framed <strong>as</strong> a feminist<br />

“choice.” This is a myth, made in the context of a<br />

society that places little value on women, children,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d caregiving. It is society that needs to ch<strong>an</strong>ge. Not<br />

women <strong>an</strong>d not babies.<br />

Systemic <strong>an</strong>d Structural Context<br />

In <strong>an</strong> essay for the Academy of <strong>Bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding</strong> Medicine<br />

on “What does feminism have to do with bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding?”,<br />

Maternal–fetal medicine specialist Dr. Alison<br />

Stuebe (2010) points out that for the most part<br />

feminist advocacy ignores bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding <strong>an</strong>d that<br />

most bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding advocacy sidesteps the complicated<br />

contextual issues of women’s lives. Stuebe<br />

notes:<br />

...the conventional wisdom is that bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding<br />

is a maternal duty that forces women to eschew<br />

their career <strong>as</strong>pirations to fulfill some ideal of<br />

motherhood, while feminism is about liberating<br />

women from exactly those constraints. C<strong>as</strong>e<br />

closed. Or is it?…The result is that women end<br />

up fighting among themselves about the choices<br />

our society forces us to make — motherhood or<br />

career? Bre<strong>as</strong>t or bottle?—instead of uniting to<br />

address the societal structures that prevent<br />

women from realizing their full potential.<br />

Appropriately, Stuebe further notes that:<br />

...bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding is not a ‘choice.’ <strong>Bre<strong>as</strong>tfeeding</strong><br />

is a reproductive right. This is a simple, but<br />

remarkably radical, concept. Here’s why: When<br />

we frame inf<strong>an</strong>t feeding <strong>as</strong> a choice made by <strong>an</strong><br />

individual women, we place the entire responsi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!