Hands of Light – Guide to Healing - Soul Circles

work of science, both mathematically and
experimentally
In 1964, physicist J. S. Bell published a
mathematical proof called Bell's theorem. Bell's
theorem mathematically supports the concept
that subatomic "particles" are connected in
some way that transcends space and time, so
that anything that happens to one particle affects
other particles. This effect is immediate
and does not need "time" to be transmitted.
Einstein's relativity theory stated that it is impossible
for a particle to travel faster than the
speed of light. In Bell's theorem, effects can be
"superluminal," or faster than the speed of
light. Bell's theorem has now been supported by
experimentation. We are now talking about a
phenomenon that, stands outside Einstein's theory
of relativity. We are trying to go beyond the
wave/particle duality.
So once again, as the state of the art of scientific
equipment advances, allowing us to probe
deeper into matter with more sensitivity, we
find phenomena that cannot be explained by the
current theory. When this kind of probing happened
in the late 1800s, the discovery of electricity
revolutionized the world and made us think
even more deeply about who we are. When it
happened again in the 1940s, atomic power revolutionized
the worlds It appears that we are
now headed into another period of tremendous
change. If physicists learn how this instantaneous
connectedness works, we could conceivably
learn to be consciously aware of our instantaneous
connections with the world and each other.
This would obviously revolutionize communication.
It would also drastically change how we
interact with each other. This instantaneous connection
may provide us with the ability to read
each others' minds whenever we want to. We
could know what is going on in each other and
truly understand each other deeply. We may
also see more clearly how our thoughts, feelings
(energy fields) and actions affect the world
much more than we previously thought.
Morphogenetic Fields
Rupert Sheldrake in his book, A New Science of
Parallels Between Haw We See Ourselves and Reality and Western Scientific Views 27
Life, proposes that all systems are regulated not
only by known energy and material factors but
also by invisible organizing fields. These fields
are causative because they serve as blueprints
for form and behavior. These fields have no energy
in the normal sense of the word because
their effect reaches across the time and space
barriers normally applied to energy. That is,
their effect is just as strong at a distance as it is
at close range.
According to this hypothesis, whenever one
member of a species learns a new behavior, the
causative field for the species is changed, however
slightly. If the behavior is repeated for long
enough, its "morphic resonance" affects the entire
species. Sheldrake called this invisible matrix
a "morphogenetic field," from morph,
"form," and genesis, "coming into being." The
action of this field involves "action at a distance"
in both space and time. Rather than form
being determined by physical laws outside of
time, it depends on morphic resonance across
time. This means that morphic fields can propagate
across space and time and that past events
could influence other events everywhere else.
An example of this is shown by Lyall Watson in
his book, Lifetide: The Biology of Consciousness, in
which he describes what is now popularly called
the Hundredth Monkey Principle. Watson
found that after a group of monkeys learned a
new behavior, suddenly other monkeys on other
islands with no possible "normal" means of
communication learned that behavior, too.
Dr. David Bohm in the journal Revisions
states that the same thing is true for quantum
physics. He says the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen
experiment showed that there would be nonlocal
connections, or subtle connections of distant
particles. So there would be a wholeness about
the system such that the formative field could
not be attributed to that particle alone. It could
only be attributed to the whole. Thus something
happening to distant particles can affect the formative
field of other particles. Bohm goes on to
state that "the notion of timeless laws that govern
the universe doesn't seem to hold up, because
time itself is part of the necessity that
developed."
In the same article, Rupert Sheldrake con-