09.01.2013 Views

REPORT MONACO gp - Mundo Motorizado

REPORT MONACO gp - Mundo Motorizado

REPORT MONACO gp - Mundo Motorizado

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Midfield teams join<br />

F1 development war<br />

increased chances to fight for top results mean smaller squads are<br />

tipped to join big guns in fine-tuning their cars through the season<br />

Ferrari technical chief Pat<br />

Fry expects the Formula 1<br />

development war to be more<br />

intense than ever this year, because<br />

the ‘midfield’ teams are upgrading<br />

their cars deeper into the season.<br />

Fry suspects that Williams,<br />

Sauber and Force India will delay<br />

switching their attention to<br />

next year’s cars because they<br />

have a chance of fighting for<br />

big results this season. Usually,<br />

only the larger teams continue<br />

to upgrade their cars in the<br />

final races of the campaign.<br />

This year more teams are<br />

capable of fighting at the front,<br />

and Fry suspects that they will<br />

introduce upgrades that are more<br />

frequent and smaller than in<br />

seasons when there is a morepredictable<br />

competitive order.<br />

“Historically, there are three<br />

or four teams that carry on<br />

developing all the way through the<br />

year,” said Fry. “But we haven’t had<br />

a season as close as this before.<br />

“Some people only update their<br />

cars in regular four-race periods<br />

and others, like McLaren, Red Bull<br />

and us, make things as soon as<br />

we find something. I’m sure most<br />

teams will now be adopting that<br />

strategy because it’s so close.”<br />

Although Red Bull, Mercedes,<br />

Ferrari and McLaren dominated<br />

last weekend’s Monaco Grand<br />

Prix, both Sauber and Williams<br />

also showed flashes of potential<br />

top-six pace, one race after Pastor<br />

Maldonado’s shock Spanish Grand<br />

Prix win for Williams.<br />

Force India has made a slower<br />

start to the season, but has been<br />

a consistent points scorer.<br />

14 autosport.com May 31 2012<br />

So far, those three teams have<br />

scored 113 points between them<br />

compared to just 30 after the<br />

same number of races in 2011.<br />

Sauber chief designer Matt<br />

Morris admitted that this could<br />

change his team’s approach.<br />

“It’s probably true,” Morris<br />

told AUTOSPORT. “Now is the<br />

time when we start looking at<br />

next year’s car and deciding how<br />

much resource we put onto it<br />

compared to development this<br />

year. It [developing deeper into<br />

the year] is something that we<br />

are considering because it’s so<br />

tight. If you look at the potential<br />

[financial] gains you get between<br />

finishing seventh and fifth in the<br />

championship, maybe it warrants<br />

spending more of your time and<br />

money on improvements.<br />

“But we have got finite<br />

resources. The problem with<br />

developing this year’s car is that,<br />

if we are not careful, it will hurt<br />

us next year. You often see the big<br />

teams that push to the end of the<br />

year struggling at the start of the<br />

next. That’s what concerns us.<br />

“After the summer break<br />

[in August], there are a lot<br />

of races and therefore a lot of<br />

opportunities for others to bring<br />

upgrades. We will bring at least<br />

one more package and maybe<br />

another one. A lot will depend<br />

on the next four races and where<br />

we stand before the break.”<br />

Typically, teams aim to<br />

have finished design work<br />

on the following year’s car by<br />

September. Aerodynamic work<br />

can continue simultaneously on<br />

the current and future cars while<br />

this happens. With the rules<br />

likely to be stable in 2013, much<br />

of that effort will be transferable.<br />

This means that continuing to<br />

develop a 2012 car in parallel<br />

with a new one will be less of a<br />

compromise on the new car than<br />

in years of bigger changes.<br />

Williams chief operations<br />

engineer Mark Gillan accepts that<br />

there is some room to reallocate<br />

resources within a small window,<br />

but says there will be no wholesale<br />

redeployment of resources.<br />

“If you look at the<br />

rewards between seventh<br />

and fifth, maybe it<br />

warrants developments”<br />

Sauber designer Matt Morris<br />

“It makes no difference at all,”<br />

said Gillan. “Our strategy stays<br />

the same and it wouldn’t matter<br />

where we are in terms of<br />

performance. There is a time<br />

when you switch over to next<br />

year’s car and you could<br />

potentially slightly alter that,<br />

but it would have an impact<br />

on the subsequent season.”<br />

Force India has vowed to keep<br />

pushing throughout the year, just<br />

as it did in 2011 – but this<br />

strategy has played a part in its<br />

slow start to the ’12 season.<br />

Deputy team principal Bob<br />

Fernley said: “We have got to push<br />

on. Williams have had a great<br />

result, Sauber have had a great<br />

result and we’ve not quite locked<br />

onto one yet. We have to keep<br />

pushing to the end.”<br />

Williams shocked the<br />

top teams in Spain

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!