o-027_towards overcoming the innovation chasm in botswana

Furthermore, of the 83 patent applications received by the Registrar of Companies and Intellectual
Property (ROCIP), the authority responsible for intellectual property management in Botswana between
the periods 2006-2011, only 15 applications were submitted by locals and out of this, only 1 patent was
granted (C.P Masena, 2011, Personal Communication). While the results of the above studies largely
confirm Botswana’s excellent performance compared to her peers on the African continent, the results
nonetheless reveal the extent of the innovation chasm in Botswana when compared to contemporary
innovations systems elsewhere. The findings potentially point to some of the areas that deserve further
attention from the point of policy interventions in order to further improve its competitiveness at the global
stage in the relevant areas. In seeking to address the innovation chasm, a number of institutional and
national strategic interventions have been undertaken and are currently being undertaken. The
government of Botswana has recognized innovation as one of the main pillars of its efforts towards
diversifying the national economy which is predominantly based on the exploitation of mineral resources.
Such recognition is evident foremost in its establishment of the Botswana Innovation Hub (BIH), the
establishment of a second public university christened the Botswana International University of Science
and Technology (BIUST), the accentuation of the roles and responsibilities of technology based public
institutions such as the Botswana Technology Centre (BOTEC), the Rural Industries Promotions
Company (RIPCO), the Rural Industries Innovations Centre (RIIC) and other government-orchestrated
innovation support agencies such as the Local Enterprise Authority (LEA), the Citizen Entrepreneurial
Development Agency (CEDA) and the Botswana Bureau of Standards (BOBS). Other interventions have
been at the legislative and policy levels and involve the review of relevant pieces of legislation and the
development of new policies. Institutionally, various public government institutions have begun the
process of self-evaluation in view of making their own contributions towards enhancing innovation and
bridging the national innovation chasm. Some of the national strategic interventions and institutional
interventions are discussed in the following sections.
The Botswana Training Authority (BOTA)
Recognizing the poor quality of the skills output from vocational, educational and training institutions,
which failed to meet the growing demand for specialized skills by the industry in Botswana, the
government set up the Botswana Training Authority in 2000 to act as regulatory body to coordinate and
monitor training provided by training institutions (BOTA, 2010). The main objectives of the Authority are to
coordinate vocational training activities in view of realizing better integration and harmonization of
vocational training activities in the country, monitor and evaluate the performance of vocation training and
provide policy advice in the same domain in order to ensure the success of all vocational training
programs in the country (BOTA, 2010).
The Botswana National Productivity Center (BNPC)
Respondents in a recent study indicated inefficient government bureaucracy, inadequately educated
workforce, and access to finance, poor work ethic in national labour force, restrictive labour regulations
and inflation as the most restrictive factors for doing business in Botswana (Figure 3).
7