11.01.2013 Views

BUAD 497: Strategic Management - USC Marshall - University of ...

BUAD 497: Strategic Management - USC Marshall - University of ...

BUAD 497: Strategic Management - USC Marshall - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

above or below grade cut<strong>of</strong>f points. The distribution <strong>of</strong> grades will closely follow the<br />

guidelines <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Marshall</strong> School <strong>of</strong> Business (an average class GPA <strong>of</strong> 3.3).<br />

Individual Participation<br />

Your attendance in this course and active participation in case discussions are essential for<br />

advancing the learning <strong>of</strong> all participants. I expect you come to class on time and be fully<br />

prepared for class discussion. I will call on students at random, to take the lead in various<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> class discussions at least once or twice during the semester. A classroom is a costfree<br />

environment for experimenting and learning. Make use <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

I score each <strong>of</strong> you at the end <strong>of</strong> each case discussion session by using a 2 if you are present;<br />

that 2 changes to a 1 if you are late or leave early. For efforts above sitting in class, I<br />

upgrade to a 3, 4, or 5 depending on the quality <strong>of</strong> your participation. With regard to quality,<br />

the dimensions include:<br />

Relevance<br />

Causal Linkage<br />

� Does the comment bear on the subject at hand?<br />

� Comments that do not link up with the discussion focus can<br />

detract from the learning experience.<br />

� Are the logical antecedents or consequences <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

argument traced out?<br />

� Comments that push the implications <strong>of</strong> a fact or idea as far as<br />

possible are generally superior.<br />

Responsiveness<br />

� Does the comment react in an important way to what someone<br />

else has said?<br />

Analysis � Is reasoning consistent and logical?<br />

Evidence<br />

� Have data from the case, from personal experience or from<br />

Importance<br />

Clarity<br />

general knowledge been used for support?<br />

� Does the contribution further our understanding <strong>of</strong> the issues at<br />

hand?<br />

� Is a connection made with other cases we have analyzed?<br />

� Is the comment succinct and understandable?<br />

� Does the contribution stick to the subject or wander around?<br />

Based on these scores, your participation cards, and peer evaluations, I assign<br />

participation/commitment scores for the final point total based on the scoring sheet<br />

(developed several years ago by students at <strong>Marshall</strong>), which will be posted on Blackboard.<br />

Important: At the end <strong>of</strong> each case discussion, students who actively participated in the<br />

discussion should turn in a Participation Card. These cards should list your name, the date, the<br />

case discussed that day, and a synopsis <strong>of</strong> your contributions during that day’s discussion.<br />

The Participation Cards will be used in combination with my own daily evaluations to<br />

determine your participation grade for the day. For this purpose, please purchase a package<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3x5 index cards and bring them to each class.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!