11.01.2013 Views

The Beauty of the Gregorian Calendar

The Beauty of the Gregorian Calendar

The Beauty of the Gregorian Calendar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> argument for an improved value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> month, or <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> months per year N = Y/M, is analogous to <strong>the</strong> above argument<br />

for <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> year. <strong>The</strong> principle <strong>of</strong> secularity implies that corrections<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Metonic cycle must be <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> form<br />

235<br />

19<br />

+ ε/30<br />

100 S2<br />

(19)<br />

where S2 is <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> secular years in which ε resets <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epact are<br />

made. <strong>The</strong> divisor 30 enters because a unit reset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epact effects an<br />

advancement or a retardation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calendar moon by 1/30 lunations. For<br />

a more detailed discussion see [7]. To obtain an optimal rational value for<br />

ε/S2, we equate (19) to <strong>the</strong> astronomical value <strong>of</strong> N, and find<br />

or<br />

ε<br />

S2<br />

ε/30<br />

S2<br />

�<br />

= 30 1236.8266 −<br />

= 100 N −<br />

23 500<br />

19<br />

(20)<br />

23 500<br />

�<br />

= −0.465... = −[0, 2, 6, 1, ...]. (21)<br />

19<br />

<strong>The</strong> rational continued fraction approximations are −1/2, −6/13, −7/15.<br />

This reasoning could not have been familiar to <strong>the</strong> makers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gregorian</strong><br />

calendar because (19) was not explicitly known to <strong>the</strong>m. <strong>The</strong>ir estimate<br />

ε/S2 ≈ −(75 − 32)/100 = −43/100 is never<strong>the</strong>less a remarkably good guess,<br />

only 3 lunar resets <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> best value in 10 000 years. <strong>The</strong> number NG given<br />

in (13) is obtained with this estimate:<br />

NG = 235<br />

19<br />

43 1<br />

− · . (22)<br />

10 000 30<br />

Considering <strong>the</strong> values YG and NG in (12) and (13), we see immediately<br />

that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gregorian</strong> calendar has a period <strong>of</strong> PG = 5 700 000 years. This is<br />

because <strong>the</strong> solar period <strong>of</strong> 400 years divides <strong>the</strong> lunar period PG, and <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> days in a solar period happens to be a multiple <strong>of</strong> 7: 146 097 days<br />

are 20 871 weeks.<br />

An analogous argument for <strong>the</strong> Julian values YJ and NJ, see (10) and<br />

(11), shows that<br />

76 YJ = 940 MJ = 27 759 days. (23)<br />

This is <strong>the</strong> so called Callippic cycle known in astronomy from antiquity, and<br />

named after Callippos <strong>of</strong> Kyzikos, about 330 BC. As 27 759 is not a multiple<br />

<strong>of</strong> 7, <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lunisolar Julian calendar is seven times <strong>the</strong> Callippic<br />

cycle,<br />

532 YJ = 6580 MJ = 194 313 days. (24)<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!