Clinical Study Report - Calidad de Información CFR
Clinical Study Report - Calidad de Información CFR
Clinical Study Report - Calidad de Información CFR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 10.1:1 Disposition of subjects<br />
N=1<br />
PCI failure<br />
N=31<br />
Patients ISU301 treated<br />
N=30<br />
Completed<br />
N=76(ISU301)<br />
PP<br />
DISPOSITION OF PATIENTS<br />
N=51<br />
Completed<br />
N=124<br />
Patients screened<br />
N=52<br />
ISU301<br />
treated<br />
N=53<br />
ISU301<br />
N=1<br />
Withdrawal<br />
N=52) N=1<br />
N=8, Major violation<br />
1) N=23) 10.2. Protocol <strong>de</strong>viations<br />
N=93<br />
Patients randomized<br />
N=1<br />
Withdrawal<br />
(SF but RDZ)<br />
N=40<br />
ReoPro<br />
N=40<br />
Completed<br />
N=36(ReoPro)<br />
PP<br />
N=4, Major violation 4)<br />
Protocol <strong>de</strong>viations were reviewed at a blind meeting (08-Feb-2006) after database lock(08-<br />
Feb-2006). Details of protocol <strong>de</strong>viations related to the efficacy endpoint were recor<strong>de</strong>d in the<br />
minutes of “Protocol Deviation Meeting” (See Appendix 16.2.2).<br />
There were 12 subject with major protocol <strong>de</strong>viation, one 1) was for CABG treatment after PCI<br />
failure, Five Clotinab patients 2) who completed the trial were consi<strong>de</strong>red to be major protocol<br />
<strong>de</strong>viations; of the five, 4 patients did not clear ‘exclusion criteria No.17’ , and 1 patient ma<strong>de</strong><br />
the study-completion return visit on Day10. rather than on Day 30. Two 3) patients dropped out<br />
of the study: 1 subject withdrew the consent on Day 2, 1 randomized subject was dropped out<br />
who should have been a screening-failure. Four ReoPro ® patients 4) were consi<strong>de</strong>red major<br />
protocol violations; 3 subjects did not clear ‘exclusion criteria No.17’, and 1 subject was given a<br />
<strong>de</strong>viant amount of the drug because of an acci<strong>de</strong>ntal disconnection of IV line during IP<br />
administration. Details are shown in Figure 10.1:1 and Table 10.2:1.<br />
CSR_Clotinab_II 44<br />
Ver. 1.0_Eng